Honig, Alan V Koondel, Scott

PETITION

CIVIL COVER SHEET

ORDER SETTING HEARING

MOTION RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT ORDER

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION F/B DFT SCOTT KOONDEL (UP 11/29/2021)

STIP SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE CIVIL

ORD SUBSTITUTION COUNSEL

MEMORANDUM OF LAW

ORDER SETTING HEARING

OBJECTION

AFFIDAVIT

MOTION FOR DEFAULT

ORDER OF DEFAULT

NOTICE OF HEARING

OBJECTION

RESPONSE TO: AND OBJECTION TO PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION F/B PLT

REQUEST

REQUEST

MOTION RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

ORDER DENYING CURLEY DTD 1/13/22: PETITIONERS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER ON MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER DENIED

ORDER GRANTING CURLEY; RESPONDENT'S AMENDED REQUEST TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF APPLICABLE LAWS COURT RULES OF PROCEDURE REGARDING ELECTRONIC SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS IN THE STATE COURTS OF CALIFORNIA IS GRANTED DTD 1/13/2022

MEMORANDUM OF LAW

STIP SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL

NOTICE OF FILING

ORDER GRANTING GCURLEY JR DTD 12/1/21 MOTION TO RECONSIDER -GRANTED COURT WILL HEAR ARGUEMENT ON THE CLAIM OF PRIVILEGE OBJECTION ** SEE ORDER**

ORDER GCURLEY JR DTD 12/2/21 DEFAULT ORDER ENTERED ON OCTOBER 18 2021 IS HEREBY VACATED THE DEPOSITIONS OF ALAN HONIG AND MARCY HONIG ARE HEREBY STAYED UNTIL SUCH TIME IT IS DETERMINED WHETHER THE CALIFORNIA COURTS HAVE THE CAPACITY TO RULE ON THE SPECIFIC PRIVILEGE ISSUES RAISED BY THE PETITIONERS INTHEIR PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER QUASHING FOREIGN SUBPOENAS TO ALAN AND MARCY HONIG (“PETITION”) FILED ONAUGUST 18, 2021, AND IF SO, THEY ELECT TO DO SO. IN PARTICULAR, THE COURT DEFERS TO THE CALIFORNIA COURTS TO DETERMINE WHETHER CERTAIN CATEGORIES OF DOCUMENTS OR SUBJECTS OF INQUIRY IN THE PROPOSED DEPOSITIONS IDENTIFED IN THE SUBPOENAS SERVED ON PETITIONERS ARE BARRED FROM DISCOVERY BY VIRTUE OF ALAN HONIG’S RETENTION AS A NON-TESTIFYING EXPERT AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT “H” OF THE PETITION, THE ACCOUNTANT-CLIENT PRIVILEGE, OR THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE. SHOULD THE CALIFORNIA COURTS BE UNABLE OR UNWILLING TO RULE ONTHE PRIVILEGE OBJECTIONS INDICATED ABOVE, THE COURT SHALL RULE ON

ORDER SETTING HEARING

PAID $401.00 ON RECEIPT 4145609

AFFIDAVIT

NOTICE OF HEARING

ORDER CURLEY DTD 12/23/21: MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART DEPOSITIONS MUST PROCEED W/IN 30 DAYS ** SEE ORDER **

AFFIDAVIT

MEMORANDUM

ORDER DENYING J CURLEY DTD 12/30/2021 RESPONDENTS MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

ORDER J CURLEY DTD 12/30/2021 ON PETITIONERS NOTICE TO THE COURT AND OBJECTION TO RESPONDENTS FAILURE TO PROVIDE NOTICE TO NECESSARY PARRTIES OF DISCOVERY REQUESTS. THE OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED FOR THE REASONS OUTLINES W/IN RESPONDENTS MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER ON MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER F/B PLTFS (UP 1/7/2022)

ORDER CURLEY DTD 1/11/22 : REQUIRING RESPONSE. RESPONDENT IS GIVEN 5 DAYS TO FILE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO PLTS' MOT FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER ON MOT FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER.