We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Michael Foland, Plaintiff(s) vs. Shawna Meyer, Defendant(s)

An Other Contract case was filed by (Subcribe to view) represented by (Subcribe to view) against (Subscribe to view) represented by (Subscribe to view) in the jurisdiction of Clark County, NV. Judge Bare, Rob presiding.

Case Details

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)   

Filing Date

September 11, 2017

Last Refreshed

November 21, 2020

Filing Location

Clark County, NV

Judge

Hon. Bare, Rob   

Category

Other Contract

Practice Area

Commercial

Matter Type

Breach of Contract

Case Outcome Type

Order of Dismissal With Prejudice

Status

Dismissal

Parties

Plaintiffs

Foland, Michael

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Chris T. Rasmussen

Defendants

Meyer, Shawna

Attorneys for Defendants

Sagar R. Raich

Case Events

Type Description
Docket Event Jury Trial
Vacated - per Secretary

Judge: Bare, Rob

Docket Event Pretrial/Calendar Call
Vacated - per Secretary

Judge: Bare, Rob

Docket Event Notice of Entry of Order for Dismissal with Prejudice
Docket Event Stipulation and Order for Dismissal with Prejudice
Docket Event Settlement Conference
Sr. Judge. Joe Bonaventure presiding. Settlement conference held. Sr. Judge Bonaventure advised case settled. Further, the signed settlement agreement and sign in sheet will be left side filed.

Judge: Bonaventure, Joseph T.

Docket Event Notice of Scheduling Settlement Conference
Docket Event Bench Trial
Vacated - per Secretary

Judge: Bare, Rob

Docket Event Order Setting Civil Non-Jury Trial and Calendar Call
Order Setting Civil Jury Trial Pre Trial Calendar Call
Docket Event Pretrial/Calendar Call
Vacated - per Secretary

Judge: Bare, Rob

Docket Event Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment
Findings of Fact and Order Denying Defendant-Counter Claimant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion to Strike
Docket Event Settlement Conference
Vacated
Docket Event Bench Trial
Vacated - per Judge

Judge: Bare, Rob

Docket Event Minute Order
This matter came before this Court on August 13, 2019, for Defendant Shawna Meyer s Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff s Complaint and Defendant Shawna Meyers Motion to Strike. After hearing oral argument, the Court took the matter under advisement. After carefully considering the arguments and evidence submitted, the Court issued its Decision this 16th day of August, 2019. COURT ORDERED Defendant Shawna Meyer s Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff s Complaint is DENIED. COURT ORDERED Defendant Shawna Meyer s Motion to Strike is DENIED. NRCP 56(c) provides, in pertinent part, The judgment sought shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Summary judgment is appropriate when the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, admissions, and affidavits, if any, that are properly before the court demonstrate that no genuine issue of material fact exists, and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Wood v. Safeway, Inc., 121 Nev. 724, 731 (2005). A factual dispute is genuine, and therefore summary judgment is inappropriate, when the evidence is such that a rational trier of fact could return a verdict for the nonmoving party. Id. All pleadings and proof must be construed in a light most favorable to the non-moving party, however, the non-moving party must do more than simply show that there is some metaphysical doubt as to the operative facts in order to avoid summary judgment being entered in the moving party's favor. The nonmoving party must, by affidavit or otherwise, set forth specific facts demonstrating the existence of a genuine issue for trial or have summary judgment entered against him. The nonmoving party is not entitled to build a case on the gossamer threads of whimsy, speculation, and conjecture. Id. (quoting Pegasus v. Reno Newspapers, Inc., 118 Nev. 706, 713-14 (2002)). NRCP 12 (f) provides in pertinent part, Upon motion made by a party before responding to a pleading or, if no responsive pleading is permitted by these rules, upon motion made by a party within 20 days after the service of the pleading upon the party or upon the court's own initiative at any time, the court may order stricken from any pleading any insufficient defense or any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter. This Court hereby finds that there are material issues of genuine fact as to whether Defendant ceased paying Plaintiff his share of the Hot Shotz Photography company profits, whether Plaintiff asked for loans from Defendant or made financial draws, and whether Defendant absconded with Plaintiff s entire business by changing bank accounts, taking the company s equipment and moving the company s operations to the parking lot of Bally s, and such findings preclude summary judgment. This Court also hereby finds that it is too early at this stage of litigation to determine which facts would tend to be relevant, let alone whether any of Plaintiff s allegations with respect to strippers, boyfriends, and relationships are insufficient defenses, redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous such as to warrant being stricken from the record. Counsel for Plaintiff is directed to submit a proposed Order consistent with this Minute Order, the submitted briefing, and oral argument. Counsel may add language to or further supplement the proposed Order in accordance with the Court s findings and any submitted arguments. Counsel is directed to have the proposed Order submitted to chambers within 10 days.

Judge: Bare, Rob

Docket Event Order Setting Civil Non-Jury Trial and Calendar Call
Order Setting Civil Non-Jury Trial, Pre-Trial / Calendar Call
Docket Event Pretrial/Calendar Call
Vacated - per Judge

Judge: Bare, Rob

Docket Event Motion for Summary Judgment
Defendant/Counter-Claimant's Motion for Summary Judgment as to All Claims
Argument that Plaintiff and Defendant entered into a business agreement; Defendant provided the investment and received 51% of the company; then the Defendant absconded with the operation and started a new company. Plaintiff argued for 49% of the profit he was entitled to. COURT ORDERED, matter UNDER ADVISEMENT and will issue a written order from Chambers.

Judge: Bare, Rob

Docket Event Notice of Scheduling Settlement Conference
Docket Event Reply in Support
Defendant/Counter-Claimant's Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment as to All Claims
Docket Event Opposition to Motion For Summary Judgment
Michael Foland's Opposition to Defendant's Motion For Summary Judgment
Docket Event Clerk's Notice of Hearing
Notice of Hearing
Docket Event Motion for Summary Judgment
Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment
Docket Event Exhibits
Defendant's Exhibits in Support of her Motion for Summary Judgment
Docket Event Order Rescheduling Calendar Call
Docket Event Order Setting Civil Non-Jury Trial and Calendar Call
Order Setting Civil Non Jury Trial, Pre Trial/ Calendar Call
Docket Event Scheduling Order
Docket Event Joint Case Conference Report
Docket Event Reply to Counterclaim
Reply to Defendant's Counter Claim
Docket Event Initial Appearance Fee Disclosure
Docket Event Answer and Counterclaims
Docket Event Affidavit of Service
Docket Event Summons
Docket Event Complaint
Docket Event Initial Appearance Fee Disclosure

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope

Your free document request was received.

Your request has been received. We will email you this document within 4 business hours.

You have used out of 0 document requests this month.

Continue

Document Requested

You have exceeded your document request limit for this month.

If you need immediate assistance, please contact support@trellis.law

Continue
Docket Refresh Requested

Your docket refresh request has been received. You will receive a notification when the docket is refreshed.

Docket Refresh Requested

A refresh is already in progress.

If you need immediate assistance, please contact support@trellis.law

Continue