arrow left
arrow right
  • Ws Aftermarket Services Corporation, And Warranty Solutions Management Corporation, v. We Cover That, Larissa Ortiz D/B/A We Cover That, Larissa Ortiz, In Her Individual Capacity, Peter Schatzel, In His Individual Capacity, And Rebecca Schatzel, In Her Individual Capacity, Commercial - Business Entity document preview
  • Ws Aftermarket Services Corporation, And Warranty Solutions Management Corporation, v. We Cover That, Larissa Ortiz D/B/A We Cover That, Larissa Ortiz, In Her Individual Capacity, Peter Schatzel, In His Individual Capacity, And Rebecca Schatzel, In Her Individual Capacity, Commercial - Business Entity document preview
  • Ws Aftermarket Services Corporation, And Warranty Solutions Management Corporation, v. We Cover That, Larissa Ortiz D/B/A We Cover That, Larissa Ortiz, In Her Individual Capacity, Peter Schatzel, In His Individual Capacity, And Rebecca Schatzel, In Her Individual Capacity, Commercial - Business Entity document preview
  • Ws Aftermarket Services Corporation, And Warranty Solutions Management Corporation, v. We Cover That, Larissa Ortiz D/B/A We Cover That, Larissa Ortiz, In Her Individual Capacity, Peter Schatzel, In His Individual Capacity, And Rebecca Schatzel, In Her Individual Capacity, Commercial - Business Entity document preview
  • Ws Aftermarket Services Corporation, And Warranty Solutions Management Corporation, v. We Cover That, Larissa Ortiz D/B/A We Cover That, Larissa Ortiz, In Her Individual Capacity, Peter Schatzel, In His Individual Capacity, And Rebecca Schatzel, In Her Individual Capacity, Commercial - Business Entity document preview
  • Ws Aftermarket Services Corporation, And Warranty Solutions Management Corporation, v. We Cover That, Larissa Ortiz D/B/A We Cover That, Larissa Ortiz, In Her Individual Capacity, Peter Schatzel, In His Individual Capacity, And Rebecca Schatzel, In Her Individual Capacity, Commercial - Business Entity document preview
  • Ws Aftermarket Services Corporation, And Warranty Solutions Management Corporation, v. We Cover That, Larissa Ortiz D/B/A We Cover That, Larissa Ortiz, In Her Individual Capacity, Peter Schatzel, In His Individual Capacity, And Rebecca Schatzel, In Her Individual Capacity, Commercial - Business Entity document preview
  • Ws Aftermarket Services Corporation, And Warranty Solutions Management Corporation, v. We Cover That, Larissa Ortiz D/B/A We Cover That, Larissa Ortiz, In Her Individual Capacity, Peter Schatzel, In His Individual Capacity, And Rebecca Schatzel, In Her Individual Capacity, Commercial - Business Entity document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED: GREENE COUNTY CLERK 03/18/2024 05:10 PM INDEX NO. EF2023-281 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/18/2024 Exhibit J FILED: GREENE COUNTY CLERK 03/18/2024 05:10 PM INDEX NO. EF2023-281 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/18/2024 02/29/2024 BLAKE C. SAUNDERS , ESQ. bsaunders@couchwhite.com 518.320.3403 direct 518.426.0376 fax February 29, 2024 VIA NYSCEF Hon. Sharon A. Graff, J.S.C. Greene County Courthouse 320 Main Street Catskill, New York 12414 Re: WS Aftermarket Services Corporation, and Warranty Solutions Management Corporation, v. WE COVER THAT! et. al. Greene County Index No.: EF2023-281 Dear Justice Graff: Our office represents Plaintiffs WS Aftermarket Services Corporation, and Warranty Solutions Management Corporation, with regard to the above referenced matter. As the Court is aware, Plaintiffs filed a motion for a default judgment against Defendants on October 16, 2023. In its Decision and Order dated January 24, 2024 (the “Order”), the Court Ordered that Defendants Larissa Ortis and Peter Schatzel would have thirty days from the date of service of the Order to appear and answer the Complaint herein. A copy of Plaintiffs’ notice of entry of the Order and the corresponding affidavits of service, reflecting service upon Defendants on January 25, 2024, are attached hereto. As it stands, the time period specified in the Court’s Order lapsed as of February 29, 2024; Ms. Ortis and Mr. Schatzel have not appeared or answered Plaintiff’s Complaint. Accordingly, we respectfully request that the Court grant Plaintiff’s default motion against Ms. Ortis and Mr. Schatzel and schedule an inquest hearing to assess the damages in this matter. Should the Court have any questions or require anything further, please contact me. Respectfully submitted, Blake C. Saunders Blake C. Saunders, Esq. Attorney BCS/gtz 1 of 11 FILED: GREENE COUNTY CLERK 03/18/2024 05:10 PM | NDEX NO. INDEX NO. EF2023-281 EF2023- 281 NYSCEF DOC. NYSCEF DOC. NO. NO 38 25 25 RECEI VED NYSCEF: RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/18/2024 02/ 29/ 2024 02/29/2024 Exhibit A Exhibit A 2 of 2 of 11 FILED: GREENE COUNTY CLERK 03/18/2024 05:10 PM INDEX NO. EF2023-281 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 23 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/18/2024 01/26/2024 02/29/2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF GREENE WS AFTERMARKET SERVICES CORPORATION, AND WARRANTY SOLUTIONS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, NOTICE OF ENTRY Plaintiffs, Index No.: EF2023-281 -against- WE COVER THAT!, LARISSA ORTIS d/b/a WE COVER THAT!, LARISSA ORTIS, in her individual capacity, PETER SCHATZEL, in his individual capacity, and REBECCA SCHATZEL, in her individual capacity, Defendants. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the annexed Decision and Order of the Hon. Sharon A. Graff, J.S.C., dated January 22, 2024; entered by the Clerk of the Greene County Supreme Court using the NYSCEF system on January 24, 2024, is hereby served upon you, and was duly filed and entered in the Greene County Clerk's Office on January 26, 2024, regarding the above- referenced matter. Dated: January 26, 2024 Albany, New York COUCH WHITE, LLP onald J. Hil , Esq. Charles G. Carluccio, Esq. Blake C. Saunders, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiffs WS Aftermarket Services Corporation and Warranty Solutions Management Corporation 540 Broadway 31 of of 11 6 FILED: GREENE COUNTY CLERK 03/18/2024 05:10 PM INDEX NO. EF2023-281 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 23 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/18/2024 01/26/2024 02/29/2024 P.O. Box 22222 Albany, New York 12201-2222 Telephone: (518) 426-4600 TO: REBECCA SCHATZEL 152 Society Hill Road Greenville, New York 12083 LARISSA ORTIS 59 Weed Road Freehold, New York 12431 LARISSA ORTIS d/b/a WE COVER THAT! 59 Weed Road Freehold, New York 12431 PETER SCHATZEL 59 Weed Road Freehold, New York 12431 WE COVER THAT! 59 Weed Road Freehold, New York 12431 42 of of 11 6 FILED: GREENE COUNTY CLERK 03/18/2024 01/24/2024 05:10 12:59 PM INDEX NO. EF2023-281 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 22 23 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/18/2024 01/24/2024 01/26/2024 02/29/2024 STATE S'I'ATE OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT C OURT GREENE COUNTY WS AFTERMARKET AFTERMARKET SERVICES CORPORATION, CORPORATION, AND WARRANTY WARRANTY SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, CORPORATION, Plaintills. Plaintiffs, Decision & Order -against- -agalnst- Index No.: 8F2023-281 EF2023-281 WE COVER THAT!, LARISSA LAzuSSA ORTIS, d/b/a d/bia WE COVER THAT!, LARISSA ORTIS, in her individual capacity, PETER PETER SCHATZEL, SCHATZEL, in his individual individual capacity, and REBECCA REBECCA SCHATZEL, in her individual individual capacity, Defendants. Delendants. Supreme Supreme Court, Greene County Return Retum Date: Date: November November 3, 3. 2023 Present: Present: Hon. Sharon A. Graff, Graff" JSC Appearances: Appearances: Couch White, White, LLP Attorneys Attomeys for Plaintiffs 540 Broadway Broadway York 12201-2222 Albany, New York 12201-2222 By: Donald J. Hillmann, By: Hillmann, Esq. Charles Charles G. Carlucccio, Esq. Blake C. Saunders, Esq. Graff, J.: Plaintiffs commenced Plaintiffs this action commenced this to recover action to recover $507,600.00 it paid $507,600.00 it in commissions paid in commissions to defendants defendants based upon allegedly allegedly fraudulently fraudulently created agreements agreements defendants defendants claimed to have made with eight automobile automobile dealerships dealerships under which 980 protection plans were allegedly sold to clients on plaintiffs. Defendants have not answered, and on behalf of plaintiffs. plaintiffs now move and plaintiffs move for aa default judgment. The motion is partially granted as discussed herein. herein. A party seeking default judgment must show that the defendants have been served, proof oftheir of their default, and proof of the facts of its claim (Dayco andproofofthe (Dayc o Mechanical Mechqnical Services Services v Toscani, 94 AD3d Toscani,94 1214 1214 [3d [3d Dept 2012]). 2012]). With respect to the third requirement. requirement, plaintiffs have met their burden by 11 53 1 of of 11 4 6 FILED: GREENE COUNTY CLERK 03/18/2024 01/24/2024 05:10 12:59 PM INDEX NO. EF2023-281 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 22 23 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/18/2024 01/24/2024 01/26/2024 02/29/2024 relying upon upon their their verified complaint complaint which adequately establishes the the facts facts constituting their claims. (CPLR §$ 3215 [f]). tfl). Turning Tuming to service, plaintiflfs' affidavits service, plaintiffs' affrdavits of service upon the individual individual defendants defendants reflect that, after making making unsuccessful unsuccessful attempts at personal delivery, the process server resorted to the "affix mail" method prescribed by CPLR §$ 308 [4]. "affix and mail" [4]. With respect to defendant Rebecca Schatzel, Schatzel, the affidavit of olservice service demonstrates demonstrates that service service by the affix and mail method was duly made, and the affirmation affirmation of plaintiffs' attorney attomey establishes establishes her default. default. Plaintiffs' submissions Plaintiffs' with respect submissions with to the respect to the remaining remaining individual individual defendants, defendants, namely, Larissa Ortis and Peter Schatzel, Schatzel, are insufficient insufficient to support a finding of default. default. The affidavits affidavits of service service show that the pleadings were v‘ ere affixed to the respective defendants' residence' residencer on May May 18. 18, 2023, 2023, and mailed to the same same address address on May 19, 19,2023. 2023. However, However, to be valid, service "affix service by the "affix mail" method must be completed by the filing of the and mail- the affidavit affrdavit of service within twenty days from either the the affixing or the the mailing of the the summons and and complaint, whichever occurs later t4]). Here, plaintiffs fi (CPLR §$ 308 [4]). led the affidavits filed affidavits of service on Larissa Larissa Ortis Ortis and Peter Schatzel on June 21, 2023, 2023, and and thus more than twenty days after both acts never completed. completed. As such, the thirty-day period to answer never began to run thirty-day mn with respect to defendants defendants Larissa Ortis and Peter [a]) and they are not in default. Schatzel (CPLR §$ 320 [a]) the failure to Nevertheless, the file proof to file of service proof of is aa mere service is mere irregularity which may inegularity which may be remedied by an order pursuant to CPLR §2004 (Haushecht v Ackerman, $2004 (Hausknecht 242 AD2d Ackerman,242 604, 606 [2nd AD2d6O4,606[2"d 1997]) and may be cured nunc pro tunc under Dept. 1997]) tnder CPLR §2001 ofaa 52001 where no substantial right of party will be prejudiced. $2001). Under the present circumstances, permitting prejudiced. (CPLR §2001). permitting plaintiffs to detay in filing the affidavit of cure the brief delay ofservice inegularity and will not an irregularity service will simply correct an ofthe prejudice any substantial right of prejudice the defendants Schatzel. Plaintiffs' time defendants Larissa Ortis and Peter Schatzel. residence address is also the defendants' business address. 'I Per the complaint, the residence address. 2 64 2 of of 11 4 6 FILED: GREENE COUNTY CLERK 03/18/2024 01/24/2024 05:10 12:59 PM INDEX NO. EF2023-281 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 22 23 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/18/2024 01/24/2024 01/26/2024 02/29/2024 within which to file their affidavit of service is hereby extended. extended, nunc nunc pro tunc, to June Jvne 22, 22, 2023, 2023, the date date they were filed with the Clerk Clerk and filed. Defendants and the same shall be deemed timely filed. Larissa Ortis and Peter Schatzel will have thirty days from the date of service ofthis service of this decision and order with notice of its entry within which to answer. Next, with respect to service upon We Cover That! plaintiffs offer an affidavit of service which they which they argue argue demonstrates tiat service was made upon the demonstrates that "Offrce of the the "Office York State the New York Secretary of State, the authorized agent for service service of process of We Cover That!", presumably pursuant to the pertinent provisions pursuant provisions of either the Business ofeither Business Corporation Law or the Limited Corporation Law Limited Liability Company Law. Ordinarily. Company Law. Ordinarily, "a process server's sworn service .... swom affidavit of service . . constitutes prima (U.5. Bank Nat. Ass'n vv Vanvliet, facie evidence of proper service" (U.S. 24 AD3d Vanvliet,24 AD3d 906. 908 [3d 906,908 [3d Dept 2005]). assumes that the process server's affidavit contains a sufficient 20051). The aforementioned rule assumes factual recitation, i.e., served, and the date, time and place of service. the name of the party served, i.e.,the service. Here, affidavit is missing some the process server's affidavit some of ofthese facts. While the affidavit these essential facts. affrdavit of service in question states that the process server served two copies copies of ofthe summons and complaint the summons complaint on "Sue "Sue Zouky, Business Business Document discretion to accept service", it Document Spec. 2, a person of suitable age and discretion does not not set identifr the recipient as a set forth the address where this service occurred or otherwise identify "deputy" "deputy" of ofthe State.2 Given these factual insufficiencies, the Court cannot conclude the Secretary of State.2 Thus, the branch of the motion for a default judgment against it sewed. Thus. that We Cover That! was served. is denied without prejudice.3 prejudice.3 22As an the pleadings whether and the an aside, it is unclear from the caption and We Cover That! is a whether We corporation, limited timited liability company, or other entity upon which service service via the Secretary of State is authorized. I To the extent proper Thatl, the factual deficiencies upon We Cover That!, proper service was effectuated upon deficiencies can be remedied by the filing of an amended affidavit of service. service. 33 75 3 of of 11 4 6 FILED: GREENE COUNTY CLERK 03/18/2024 01/24/2024 05:10 12:59 PM INDEX NO. EF2023-281 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 22 23 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/18/2024 01/24/2024 01/26/2024 02/29/2024 Accordingly, Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED ORDERED that that plaintiffs motion for aa default judgment motion for is granted judgment is granted solely solely as as against defendant Rebecca Schatzel, Schatzel, with an inquest to be scheduled scheduled at a later date, and denied as against the remaining remaining defendants; and it is further ORDERED against defendants Larissa Ortis, individually and d/b/a We Cover That!, and Peter Schatzel, Schatzel, individually and d/b/a We Cover That! is denied; and it is further ORDERED plaintiffs' time that plaintiffs' ORDERED that within which time within to file which to file its its affidavit of service affidavit of service upon defendants defendants Larissa Ortis and Peter to June Peter Schatzel is extended, nunc pro tunc, to Iwrc 21, 2023, and 21,2023, and the same are hereby deemed timely filed; and it is further fuither Ortii's and Peter ORDERED that defendants Larissa Ortis's Peter Schatzel's time to appear appear and answer the ofthis complaint herein shall be 30 days from the date of service of this decision and order upon them, together entry. Said service shall be made by the methods authorized by CPLR §$ 2103 [c]. with notice of its entry. [c]. Decision and Order of This shall constitute the Decision the Court. ofthe Decision and Order Court. The original Decision NYSCEF. The signing of this Decision is being filed with the Greene County Clerk's Office via NYSCEF. Decision 2220. Counsel is not relieved from Order shall not constitute entry or filing under CPLR §$ 2220. and Order regarding notice of entry. the applicable provisions of that rule regarding SO ORDERED. ORDERED. Dated{\t^o*lZr,?tZ4 Dated: ZDV I Catskill, ew York ' Catskilt, $,lewYork EWER, E R, 'SHARON S itAAY-E, ONA.G A. GRA F, F J Papers considered: Notice of Motion dated October 13, 2023; Attorney 13,2023; Affirmation by Blake C. Attomey Affirmation Saunders dated October 13, 13, 2023, with Exhibits Exhibits A-F; and Memorandum Memorandum of Law dated October 13, 13, 2023. 4 86 4 of of 11 4 6 FILED: GREENE COUNTY CLERK 03/18/2024 05:10 PM | NDEX NO. INDEX NO. EF2023-281 EF2023- 281 NYSCEF DOC. NYSCEF DOC. NO. NO 38 25 25 RECEI VED NYSCEF: RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/18/2024 02/ 29/ 2024 02/29/2024 Exhibit B Exhibit B 9 of 9 of 11 FILED: GREENE COUNTY CLERK 03/18/2024 05:10 PM INDEX NO. EF2023-281 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 24 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/18/2024 01/25/2024 02/29/2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF GREENE WS AFTERMARKET SERVICES CORPORATION, AND WARRANTY SOLUTIONS MANAGEMENT AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, Index No.: EF2023-281 - against - WE COVER THAT!, LARISSA ORTIS d/b/a WE COVER THAT!, LARISSA ORTIS, in her individual capacity, PETER SCHATZEL, in his individual capacity, and REBECCA SCHATZEL, in her individual capacity, Defendants. STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss.: COUNTY OF ALBANY ) I, Griffin T. Zeh, hereby certify that on January 25, 2024, I electronically filed the foregoing within Notice of Entry of the Decision and Order of the Hon. Sharon A. Graff, J.S.C., dated January 22, 2024; with the Clerk of the Greene County Supreme Court using the NYSCEF system, which sent notification of such filing and by depositing a true and correct copy of same, properly enclosed in a post-paid wrapper, in the official depository maintained and exclusively controlled by the United States Post Office at 540 Broadway, Albany, New York, directed to said attorneys and/or said parties not appearing by attorneys at said addresses, those being the addresses within the state designated for that purpose upon the last papers served in this action or the place where the above then resided or kept offices, according to the best information which can be conveniently obtained, upon the following: TO: REBECCA SCHATZEL LARISSA ORTIS 152 Society Hill Road 59 Weed Road Greenville, New York 12083 Freehold, New York 12431 LARISSA ORTIS WE COVER THAT! d/b/a WE COVER THAT! 59 Weed Road 59 Weed Road Freehold, New York 12431 Freehold, New York 12431 PETER SCHATZEL 59 Weed Road Freehold, New York 12431 10 1 of 11 2 FILED: GREENE COUNTY CLERK 03/18/2024 05:10 PM INDEX NO. EF2023-281 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 24 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/18/2024 01/25/2024 02/29/2024 GR7 I.ZEH Sworn to before me this 2.5114-day of January, 2024. -rtyr..\ Notary Public NICHOLAS BRADT Notary Public, State of New York Qualified in Schenectady Co., No. DIBRa258019 C) 8 °I'D() 3 Commission Expires:4334MT - 2 11 2 of 11 2