arrow left
arrow right
  • Paul Franzese, Allison Franzese v. Doron I. Ilan Md, Premier Orthopaedics, Gideon Yoeli Md, Manhattan Medical, Jamaica Hospital Medical Center Medical Malpractice document preview
  • Paul Franzese, Allison Franzese v. Doron I. Ilan Md, Premier Orthopaedics, Gideon Yoeli Md, Manhattan Medical, Jamaica Hospital Medical Center Medical Malpractice document preview
  • Paul Franzese, Allison Franzese v. Doron I. Ilan Md, Premier Orthopaedics, Gideon Yoeli Md, Manhattan Medical, Jamaica Hospital Medical Center Medical Malpractice document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 11/15/2019 03:05 PM INDEX NO. 707170/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 106 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/15/2019 Short Form Order NEW YORK SUPREME COURT - QUEENS COUNTY Present: HONORABLE Joseph J. Esposito IA Part 6 Justice PAUL FRANZESE, Index No. 707170/2015 Plaintiff, Motion Date: 10/7/19 -against- Motion Sequence No.4 DORON I. ILAN, M.D., PREMIER ORTHOPAEDICS OF WESTCHESTER AND ROCKLAND, P.C., Defendants. The following papers numbered 1 to 9 read on this motion by defendants, Doron I. Ilan, M.D., Premier Orthopaedics of Westchester and Rockland, P.C., for an order, pursuant to CPLR Section 4404(b): (1) setting aside the verdict based upon juror misconduct; (2) setting aside the verdict based upon.the court's misreading of the medical malpractice charge; (3) setting aside the verdict as excessive and (4) reducing the verdict amount and (5) for such other and further relief as this court may deem just and proper; Cross motion by plaintiff for an order pursuant to CPLR Section 4404 and 5501, increasing the future pain and suffering amount to $850,000.00 or directing a new trial on damages. Papers Numbered Notice of Motion - Affidavits - Exhibits 1-4 Notice of Cross-Motion-Affidavits 5-7 Affirmation in Reply 8-9 Upon the foregoing papers, it is ORDERED that the motion in chief is denied in its entirety. Similarly the cross motion is denied. This medical malpractice action commenced on April 25, 1 of 3 FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 11/15/2019 03:05 PM INDEX NO. 707170/2015 NYSCEF se' DOC. NO. 106 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/15/2019 2019 and resulted in a verdict in favor of plaintiff on May 2, 2019 for past pain and suffering in the sum of $550,000.00 and future pain and suffering for ten years in the sum of $400,000.00 (see Exhibit A to motion in chief). The jury found that Dr. Ilan departed from accepted standard of medical practice "by not performing surgery to repair Mr. Franzese's ulnar collateral ligament on March 18, 2013 or after?" The jury further found that this deviation was a substantial factor in causing Mr. Franzese's injuries. This was the only deviation that the jury found. Now, defendants attempt to set aside the jury verdict alleging juror misconduct. In support of their motion defendants allege that JoAnn Mesisca, Juror Number 1 failed to disclose an experience she had when her son had not received proper medical care until he went to a second doctor (see Mendys Affirmation in Support at paragraph 26). This baseless accusation is belied by Ms. Mesisca's affidavit in opposition which states in relevant part: I spoke outside of the jury room to plaintiff's and defendants' counsel and discussed with them both an experience my stepdaughter's husband had with a physician related to a kidney stones (sic)that required that he see a second physician for appropriate treatment. I do not have a son and have never been involved in my stepdaughter's husband's medical care. The record is devoid of any juror misconduct. A verdict shall not be set aside as the result of purported juror misconduct absent proof of substantial prejudice (see Snediker v County of Orange, 58 NY2d 647 (1982]). As such, the branch of defendants' motion seeking an order setting aside the verdict due to alleged juror misconduct is denied. The branch of defendants' motion to set aside the verdict due to the misreading of the charge on medical malpractice is similarly denied and completely devoid of merit. 2 2 of 3 FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 11/15/2019 03:05 PM INDEX NO. 707170/2015 NYSCEF • e- DOC. NO. 106 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/15/2019 The remaining branch of defendants' motion to set aside the verdict as excessive or reduce same is denied. Plaintiff's cross motion seeking an order increasing the award for future pain and suffering from $400,000.00 to $850,900.00 is denied. It is well settled that a jury's award regarding awards for past and future pain and suffering shall not be set aside unless the award deviates materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see McEachin v City of New York, 137 AD3d 753 citations omitted [2 Dept 2016]. The court finds that the amount awarded by the jury for future pain and suffering was reasonable and should not be disturbed. The foregoing constitutes the decision and order of this court. A copy of this order is being emailed to both sides this date. Dated: November 12, 2019 JOSEPH OSITO, J.S. FILED NOV 1 5 2019 COUNTY CLERK QUEENS COUNTY 3 of 3