On November 29, 2016 a
Miscellaneous
was filed
involving a dispute between
Gianfermo, Carole,
Joseph, Dominique Chesere,
Joseph, Eddy, Jr,
Meschi, Donna Marie,
Meschi, Vincent Andrew,
Roes 1-10,
and
California Automobile Insurance Company,
Does 1 Through 10,
Does 1 Through 20,
Does 3 Through 10,
Mercury Casualty Company,
Mercury Insurance Services, Llc,
for Complex Civil Unlimited Class Action
in the District Court of San Mateo County.
Preview
CM-010
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY ame Slale Ear number. and 3 FOR COURT USEONLY
—J. Edward Kerlcy (175695), Dy an L. Schaffcr (1536i'fi'3i5sarah Autcn (302084)
Kerley Scliaffcr LLP
1939 Harrison Street, Suite 500
Oakland, CA 94612
FILED
m AN MATEO COUNTY
rermoveno; 510—379—5801 FAXNo; 510-228-0350
ATI’ORNEYFORWame): Plaintiffs Donna MeSChl, et a1.
"A
SUPERIOR COURT or CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF San Mateo ND 2016
STREET ADDRESS: 400 County Center
MAILINGADDRESS: 400 County Center t ‘ l the parlor Court
crrvAND ZIP CODE Redwood City, CA 94063
By“
BRANCH NAME
CASE NAME:
v/ P CLERK
Meschi, et al. v. Mercury Casualty Company
I?
CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Complex Case Designation CASEN'JMBIRE
C l V 0 Z 6 ii
/ u
Unlimited
a
l:l
Limited
o 0
Counter I: Joinder l:l
(Amount (Amount
JUDGE
demanded demanded is Filed with first appearance by defendant
exceeds $25,000) $25,000 or less) (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.402) DEPT:
Items 1—6 below must be completed (see instructions on page 2).
. Check one box below for the case type that best describes this case:
Auto Tort Contract Provisionally Complex Civil Litigation
Auto (22) Breach of contract/warranty (05) (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.400—3.403)
Uninsured motorist (46) Rule 3.740 collections (09) l:l Antitrustfl'rade regulation (03)
Other PIIPDIWD (Personal Injury/Property DDEIUD Other collections (09) l:l Construction defect (10)
DamageNVrongful Death) Tort El
Asbestos (04)
From“ "ab”“y (24)
Insurance coverage (18)
Other contract (37)
Real Property
I:
l:l
Mass 101(40)
Securities litigation (28)
EnvironmentaIfToxic tort (30)
I: Medical malpractice (45)
El Eminent domainl Inverse l:l Insurance coverage claims arising from the
Other PI/PDNVD (23)
Non-PllPD/WD (Other) Tort I:
1:]
condemnation (14)
' t.
wrong fU l BV‘CIDM 33 )
above listed provisionally complex case
types (41)
Enforcement °f JUdgmem
l
.
h
a
f
-=
|||||I||||I|||lIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I:
D
Business tort/unfair business practice (07)
Civil rights (08)
Defamation (13)
Other real property (26)
Unlawful Detainer
Commercial (31)
-
El Enforcement of judgment (20)
Miscellaneous Civil Complaint
l
!
Ew8
g
cl»
E
3
Cl Fraud (16) l:l . .
Resrdentlal (32) 1:] RICO (27)
:
'
o= l 273170
l:l Intellectual property(19) l:l Drugs (33) Other complaint (notspecified above) (42) Kg
8E
--
I:l Professional negligence (25) JudiCIa' ReVIe‘"
D Other non-PI/PD/WD I0” (35)
Employment E Asset forfeiture (05.)
Petition re: arbitration award (11)
Miscellaneous Civil Petition
Partnership and corporate governance (21)
Wrongful termination (36) El Writ of mandate (02)
C) Other petition (not specified above) (43)
Other employment (15) C] Other judicial review (39)
2. This case II]is l:l is not complex under rule 3.400 of the California Rules of Court. It the case is complex, mark the
factors requiring exceptional judicial management:
[:1 Large number of separately represented parties
a.
b.I: Extensive motion practice raising difficult or novel
issues that will be timeconsuming to resolve
d.
e.
Large number of witnesses
I:
Coordination with related actions pending in one or more courts
in other counties, states, or countries, or in a federal court
c. Substantial amount of documentary evidence f. E
Substantial postjudgmentjudicial supervision
3. Remedies sought (check all that apply): monetary all] b.-
nonmonetary; declaratory or injunctive relief 0. .punitive
4. Number of causes of action (specify): 4: Unfair Business Practice; Declaratory Relief; Breach of Contract etc.
5. This case is Cl
is not a class action suit. my FAx
6. If there are any known related cases, file and serve a notice of related case. (You may use form CM—015.)
Date: November 29, 2016
Sarah Auten
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME)
) M (SIGNATURE OF PARTY 0R ATTORNEY FOR PARTY)
NOTICE
0 Plaintiff must file this cover sheet with the first paper filed in the action or proceeding (except small claims cases or cases filed
under the Probate Code, Family Code, or Welfare and Institutions Code). (Cal. Rules of Court. rLIe 3.220.) Failure to file may result
in sanctions.
' File this cover sheet in addition to any cover sheet required by local court mle.
0 If this case is complex under rule 3.400 et seq. of the California Rules of Court.
you must serve a copy of this cover sheet on all
other parties to the action or proceeding.
- Unless this is a collections case under rule 3.740 or a complex case, this cover sheet will be used for statistical purposes
only etotz
as
Form Adopted for Mandabry Use Cal. Fulesof Court. rules 230, 3.220.3400-0403, 3.740;
Judidal Councl of California CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Cal. Standards of Judbial Administration. std. 3.10
CM-Of 0 [Rev July 1. 2007] mvwcoutlnfofrzrgw
Document Filed Date
November 29, 2016
Case Filing Date
November 29, 2016
Category
Complex Civil Unlimited Class Action
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
CM-010 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY ame Slale Ear number. and 3 FOR COURT USEONLY —J. Edward Kerlcy (175695), Dy an L. Schaffcr (1536i'fi'3i5sarah Autcn (302084) Kerley Scliaffcr LLP 1939 Harrison Street, Suite 500 Oakland, CA 94612 FILED m AN MATEO COUNTY rermoveno; 510—379—5801 FAXNo; 510-228-0350 ATI’ORNEYFORWame): Plaintiffs Donna MeSChl, et a1. "A SUPERIOR COURT or CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF San Mateo ND 2016 STREET ADDRESS: 400 County Center MAILINGADDRESS: 400 County Center t ‘ l the parlor Court crrvAND ZIP CODE Redwood City, CA 94063 By“ BRANCH NAME CASE NAME: v/ P CLERK Meschi, et al. v. Mercury Casualty Company I? CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Complex Case Designation CASEN'JMBIRE C l V 0 Z 6 ii / u Unlimited a l:l Limited o 0 Counter I: Joinder l:l (Amount (Amount JUDGE demanded demanded is Filed with first appearance by defendant exceeds $25,000) $25,000 or less) (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.402) DEPT: Items 1—6 below must be completed (see instructions on page 2). . Check one box below for the case type that best describes this case: Auto Tort Contract Provisionally Complex Civil Litigation Auto (22) Breach of contract/warranty (05) (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.400—3.403) Uninsured motorist (46) Rule 3.740 collections (09) l:l Antitrustfl'rade regulation (03) Other PIIPDIWD (Personal Injury/Property DDEIUD Other collections (09) l:l Construction defect (10) DamageNVrongful Death) Tort El Asbestos (04) From“ "ab”“y (24) Insurance coverage (18) Other contract (37) Real Property I: l:l Mass 101(40) Securities litigation (28) EnvironmentaIfToxic tort (30) I: Medical malpractice (45) El Eminent domainl Inverse l:l Insurance coverage claims arising from the Other PI/PDNVD (23) Non-PllPD/WD (Other) Tort I: 1:] condemnation (14) ' t. wrong fU l BV‘CIDM 33 ) above listed provisionally complex case types (41) Enforcement °f JUdgmem l . h a f -= |||||I||||I|||lIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I: D Business tort/unfair business practice (07) Civil rights (08) Defamation (13) Other real property (26) Unlawful Detainer Commercial (31) - El Enforcement of judgment (20) Miscellaneous Civil Complaint l ! Ew8 g cl» E 3 Cl Fraud (16) l:l . . Resrdentlal (32) 1:] RICO (27) : ' o= l 273170 l:l Intellectual property(19) l:l Drugs (33) Other complaint (notspecified above) (42) Kg 8E -- I:l Professional negligence (25) JudiCIa' ReVIe‘" D Other non-PI/PD/WD I0” (35) Employment E Asset forfeiture (05.) Petition re: arbitration award (11) Miscellaneous Civil Petition Partnership and corporate governance (21) Wrongful termination (36) El Writ of mandate (02) C) Other petition (not specified above) (43) Other employment (15) C] Other judicial review (39) 2. This case II]is l:l is not complex under rule 3.400 of the California Rules of Court. It the case is complex, mark the factors requiring exceptional judicial management: [:1 Large number of separately represented parties a. b.I: Extensive motion practice raising difficult or novel issues that will be timeconsuming to resolve d. e. Large number of witnesses I: Coordination with related actions pending in one or more courts in other counties, states, or countries, or in a federal court c. Substantial amount of documentary evidence f. E Substantial postjudgmentjudicial supervision 3. Remedies sought (check all that apply): monetary all] b.- nonmonetary; declaratory or injunctive relief 0. .punitive 4. Number of causes of action (specify): 4: Unfair Business Practice; Declaratory Relief; Breach of Contract etc. 5. This case is Cl is not a class action suit. my FAx 6. If there are any known related cases, file and serve a notice of related case. (You may use form CM—015.) Date: November 29, 2016 Sarah Auten (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) ) M (SIGNATURE OF PARTY 0R ATTORNEY FOR PARTY) NOTICE 0 Plaintiff must file this cover sheet with the first paper filed in the action or proceeding (except small claims cases or cases filed under the Probate Code, Family Code, or Welfare and Institutions Code). (Cal. Rules of Court. rLIe 3.220.) Failure to file may result in sanctions. ' File this cover sheet in addition to any cover sheet required by local court mle. 0 If this case is complex under rule 3.400 et seq. of the California Rules of Court. you must serve a copy of this cover sheet on all other parties to the action or proceeding. - Unless this is a collections case under rule 3.740 or a complex case, this cover sheet will be used for statistical purposes only etotz as Form Adopted for Mandabry Use Cal. Fulesof Court. rules 230, 3.220.3400-0403, 3.740; Judidal Councl of California CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Cal. Standards of Judbial Administration. std. 3.10 CM-Of 0 [Rev July 1. 2007] mvwcoutlnfofrzrgw