arrow left
arrow right
  • DONNA MESCHI vs MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANYComplex Civil Unlimited Class Action document preview
  • DONNA MESCHI vs MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANYComplex Civil Unlimited Class Action document preview
  • DONNA MESCHI vs MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANYComplex Civil Unlimited Class Action document preview
  • DONNA MESCHI vs MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANYComplex Civil Unlimited Class Action document preview
  • DONNA MESCHI vs MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANYComplex Civil Unlimited Class Action document preview
  • DONNA MESCHI vs MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANYComplex Civil Unlimited Class Action document preview
  • DONNA MESCHI vs MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANYComplex Civil Unlimited Class Action document preview
  • DONNA MESCHI vs MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANYComplex Civil Unlimited Class Action document preview
						
                                

Preview

1’ 1s—cIv—02607 \ so & Stipulation Order ; mm:mummummmm WEED (_ LORA D. HEMPHILL (SBN 214654) cammmooom KRISTINE N. ULRICH (SBN 310930) HAGER & DOWLING FEB 2 0 .2020 Professional Corporation 319 East Carrillo Street Qlerk‘or ' ~ Coun- - Santa Barbara, California 93101 966- 4700 ‘ §y_ l ‘ Fax: (805) 966- 4120 t (805 WOLERK mail hdlaw. com \OOOQONUILUJNr—A Attorneys for Defendants Mercury Casualty Company, California Automobile Insurance Company and Mercury Insurance Serv1ces, LLC SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO / COMPLEX CIVIL LITIGATION Donna Marie Meschi, an individual, CASE No. 16CIV0260'7 Vincent Meschi, an individual, on behalf of themselves and a class of similarly situated STIPULATION T0 CONTINUE persons, and Roes 1-10, DATE 0F MOTION TO STRIKE AND DEMURRER; [PROPOSED] Plaintiffs, ORDER V. Date: March 19, 2020 Time: 1:30 p.m. Mercury Casualty Company, a Place: 22 corporation, California Automobile Insurance Company, a corporation, Assignedfor All Purposes to the Hon. Mercury Insurance Services, LLC, a Danny Y Chou, Dept. 22 limited corporation and Does 3 through NNNNNNNNNI—v—lr—Ar—‘p—Hr—ar—Ar—Ar—a 10, Action Filed: November 29, 2016 Defendants. Trial Date: Not Set Plaintiffs Donna Marie Meschi and Vincent Meschi ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants Mercury Casualty Company, California Automobile Insmafice Company and Mercury Insurance Services, LLC ("Defendants"), (hereinafter collectively "the Parties"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate to the following: ' WHEREAS, the hearing on any motion to strike and_ demurrer to the second amended complaint is currently scheduled for March 19, 2020; 'WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiffs has an early discovery deadline in a federal case, Which necessitates out-of—staté travel, as well as a jury trial set for March, plaintiffs‘ counsel is Without counsel to cover the hearing on March 19, 2020; 1 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATE OF MOTION TO STRIKE AND DEMURRER; [PROPOSED] ORDER WHEREAS, Defendants intend to file a demurrer and motion t0 strike the second amended complaint; . WMAS, the Parties have agreed and request that this Court issue an order that the present hearing date of March 19, 2020 be vacated and continued to either April 2,2020, April 3, 2020, April 9, KOOOQQU‘I-PUJNH 2020, or any date thereafter selected by the Court; and WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed that the deadline for filing any demurrer or motion to strike the second amended complaint, and any opposition and reply thereto shall be governed by Code of Civil Procedure § 1005 based on the hearing date for the demurrer or motion to strike. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Parties, through their respective counsel: 1. The demurrer and motion to strike hearing in this matter currently set for March 19, 2020, in Department 22 of the above—entitled Court, be continued to April 2, 2020, April 3, 2020, April 9, 2020 or any date thereafter determined by the Court; and 2. The deadline for filing any demurrer or motion to strike the second amended complaint, and any opposition and reply thereto shall be governed by Code of Civil Procedure § 1005 based on the hearing date for the demurrer or motion to strike. NNNNNNNNNHHHHHr—‘p—Ar—AHp—a /// /// OOQONM-bWNHOKOWQQUl-PWNHO /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// 2 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DA'IE OF MOTION TO STRIKE AND DEMURRER; [PROPOSED] ORDER This stipulation may be signed in counterparts, each counterpart having the same force and effect as originals, and a pdf, electronic 01'facsimile signature shall be deemed to have the same force as an original signature. DATED: February fl, 2020 \DOOQQMAUONr—A Company, California Automobile Insurance Company and Mercury Insurance Services, LLC “DATED: Febmary)b( ,2020 KERLEY SCHAFFER LLP 'iBy: DyMS chéffer Nibliolas. Peterson Attorneys for Plaintiffs NNNNNNNNNHD—ti—An—AHp—Ap—AHHH Ooflo‘xU‘I-AUJNHOOWQGM-hwwflo 3 ‘ ‘STIPULATION Tc CdNfiNUE DATE OF MOTION‘To‘siRHLE’AND'DEMURRER; [PROPOSED] ORDER [PROPOSED] ORDER GOOD CAUSE APPEARING IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Pursuant to the paflies’ stipulation, Defendants Mercury Casualty Company, California Automobile Insurance Compafiy and Mercury Insurance Services,- LLC’s demurrer and motion to strike hearing is hereby continued to \DOOQGUl-PUJNH ‘3 6195 | ,2020, at ii30 ?.m- 2. The deadline for filing any demurrer 0r motion to strike the second amended complaint, and any opposition and reply thereto shall be governed by Code 0f Civil Procedure § 1005 based on the hearing date for the demurrer or motion to strike. r—A p—t IT Is so ORDERED. r—t r—A DATED: 2. 10 20w r—A HONORABLE DANNY Y CHOU r—I r—t r—t |—-V>—t OOflQUI-DUJNHOKDOOQQUI-DUJNHO [\J [\J N N N [Q N N N 4 STIPULATION To CONTINUE DATE 0F MOTION To STRIKE AND DEMURRER; [PROPOSED] ORDER