arrow left
arrow right
  • WILLIS , STEVEN vs D F RESTAURANT LLC et al document preview
  • WILLIS , STEVEN vs D F RESTAURANT LLC et al document preview
  • WILLIS , STEVEN vs D F RESTAURANT LLC et al document preview
  • WILLIS , STEVEN vs D F RESTAURANT LLC et al document preview
  • WILLIS , STEVEN vs D F RESTAURANT LLC et al document preview
  • WILLIS , STEVEN vs D F RESTAURANT LLC et al document preview
  • WILLIS , STEVEN vs D F RESTAURANT LLC et al document preview
  • WILLIS , STEVEN vs D F RESTAURANT LLC et al document preview
						
                                

Preview

STATE OF MISSOURI ) ENTERED CITY OF ST. LOUIS } SEP 08 2010 MISSOURI CIRCUIT COURT D. TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL oIncuES Bs (ST. LOUIS CITY) P iO) Stivun Wallis Ui - £69543 Plaintiff(s), Cause No. Division No. 13 d F [esTo ad D/g IA dul Tepo ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendants(s). ) JUDGMENT This action came before this Court and a Jury. The parties appeared in person and by their re- spective attorneys. The issues have been duly tried and the Jury rendered its verdict. VERDICT Whereas, on the claim of Pla unt for Dlaintii#Beienaan Perse nal Lrjunes , against " Yet wdlent— pos-desr oie fthe Jury assessed the percentages of fault as follows#” Plauitiff 2» Defendkecat— _ 7s iw 4b 1 Form B FILE COPY% JL ZL / Sy LZ ( ( Cc 100% The Jury found the total damages of Ciaigip Pefehdady, disregarding any fault on the part of (Plaintit), Metendgny, to be $ 1S, A00.% Dollars and __2© Cents. WHEREFORE, it is hereby ordered and adjudged that. Flora td Teak Will's IF have and recover of: oT — Defender _ 4, 250,22 Whereas, on the claim of for Plaintiff/Defer (personal injuries), (property damages), aga} [the Jury found in Plaintiff/Defendant favor of the (Plaintiff), (Defendant)/(and/or) [the Jury assessetNthe percentages of fault as follows:] L— FR ce Yas : @ eas) B SEP 08 200 "MARIANO V. FAVAZZA 2GUIT COURT won orn DEPUTY _ 100% 14K 2 Form A FILE COPYT y folindAhe ae pages OE Sa ly fault_om the pay of ALT RE, it is y ordered arid adjudged Soe So [Cost of this action to be taxed against the > PEoHEp ekDefendantpyy/ pAeos) xGised). Wha A itline isbs2 Mom Cin S87 Attorney for Pane Bar# Attorney for Defendant, Bar# 133 Se W & 3636S. Geyer Rel 6097 Address Aamyess give atls 1078 S{-966- TIO Phone # Phone # SO ORDERED: « Z Judge, Division No. _t? Judge No. __ Adobe SEAL of the CIRCUIT COURT IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, | Have hereunto set,my hand and affixed the seal of said Court, at office in the City of St. Louis, this day of BaQod. MARIANO V. FAVAZZA Circuit Clerk or’ Waa hoses Ye? an) Deputy Clerk MARIANO V. FAVAZZA JACUIT court { ] see attached supplemental judgment form(s) which is/are made a part hereto. CIRCUI eUTY ee 14K 3 Form A FILE COPY