arrow left
arrow right
  • DORA SCOTT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN et al VS. KINDRED HEALTHCARE OPERATING INC., A CORPORATION et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • DORA SCOTT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN et al VS. KINDRED HEALTHCARE OPERATING INC., A CORPORATION et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • DORA SCOTT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN et al VS. KINDRED HEALTHCARE OPERATING INC., A CORPORATION et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • DORA SCOTT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN et al VS. KINDRED HEALTHCARE OPERATING INC., A CORPORATION et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • DORA SCOTT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN et al VS. KINDRED HEALTHCARE OPERATING INC., A CORPORATION et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • DORA SCOTT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN et al VS. KINDRED HEALTHCARE OPERATING INC., A CORPORATION et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • DORA SCOTT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN et al VS. KINDRED HEALTHCARE OPERATING INC., A CORPORATION et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • DORA SCOTT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN et al VS. KINDRED HEALTHCARE OPERATING INC., A CORPORATION et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED document preview
						
                                

Preview

IEA SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Jul-0@2011 3:35 pm Case Number: cGC-1 0-502330 Filing Date: Jul-06-2011 3:33 Juke Box: 001 “Image: 03261506 ORDER IVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN et al vs. KINDRED HEALTHCARE OPERATING INC 001003261506 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.BY FAX 9 10 5 1 433 12 Bes 284 13 ae0 Ons eee 14 QeR 283 15 GEO 2 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 KHEN1066580477615v.1 RICK CANVEL (SBN: 144798) WILLIAM F. HORSEY, JR. (SBN: 13609; SUPPLE AND CANVEL LLP in “al, LE He Court 2320 MARINSHIP WAY, SUITE 301 i" SAUSALITO, CA 94965 JUL 06 mort JUL 09 2011 Phone: (415) 366-5533 Fax: (415) 480-6301 CLERK QF THE Col Attorneys for Defendants Sr — Oe KINDRED NURSING CENTERS WEST LLC dba ay Clark TUNNELL CENTER FOR REHABILITATION HEALTHCARE; KINDRED HEALTHCARE OPERATING, INC.; and KINDRED HEALTHCARE, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO — UNLIMITED JURISDICTION CASE NO, CGC-10-502330 DORA SCOTT, Individually and as Successor (Unlimited Civil Jurisdiction) in Interest of Decedent Aquiles Fung, et al., CONFIDENTIALITY STIPULATION REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) PROPRIETARY/TRADE SECRET ) ) ) ) ) ) Ys. KINDRED HEALTHCARE OPERATING, INC., a corporation, et al., DOCUMENTS Defendants. Plaintiffs DORA SCOTT, Individually and as Successor in Interest of Decedent Aquiles Fung, et al., (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants KINDRED NURSING CENTERS WEST LLC dba TUNNELL CENTER FOR REHABILITATION HEALTHCARE; KINDRED HEALTHCARE OPERATING, INC.; and KINDRED HEALTHCARE, INC. (“Defendants”) hereby enter into the following Confidentiality Stipulation: 1. Plaintiffs served Request for Production of Documents, Set One and Two, as well as Request for Documents at Depositions on DEFENDANTS KINDRED HEALTHCARE OPEHATING, INC. and KINDRED NURSING CENTERS WEST LLC dba TUNNELL CENTER FOR REHABILITATION HEALTHCARE which asked for policy and procedure manuals, training documents and other proprietary documents in use at TUNNELL CENTER «fe CONFIDENTIALITY STIPULATION REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL PROPRIETARY/TRADE SECRET DOCUMENTSSuppie & Canvel LLP 2320 Marinship Way, Suite 301 Sausalito, CA 94965 ~ FOR REHABILITATION HEALTHCARE. In response to said lawful discovery request, DEFENDANTS KINDRED HEALTHCARE OPERATING, INC. and KINDRED NURSING CENTERS WEST LLC dba TUNNELL CENTER FOR REHABILITATION HEALTHCARE have agreed to produce certain documents which contain or refer to proprietary information and/or other material which defendants consider to be “CONFIDENTIAL.” As used herein, “CONFIDENTIAL” is defined as private trade information which is used in the conduct of defendant’s business which gives defendants an advantage over its competitors and which is not disclosed to the public. The documents considered “CONFIDENTIAL” and proprietary or privileged are identified as policy and procedure manuals, training documents, and in-service documents. 2. In order that all parties may obtain evidence in this case, it is necessary to make these documents and discovery available to counsel of record and others while protecting each party against unnecessary disclosure of proprietary and confidential or privileged information. Consequently, the above-described documents, which are considered “CONFIDENTIAL” as described herein, shall not be delivered to any person except as provided in paragraph 4. Neither the contents nor substance of these documents shall be revealed except to persons authorized by paragraph 4 of this Stipulation. Confidentiality is to be maintained, both during and after the disposition of this case, except as provided in paragraph 8 below. 3. Nothing in this Stipulation shall require any person to treat as “CONFIDENTIAL” any material or information which is not obtained from the other party or from a third party who is under an express obligation not to disclose the material and information. 4. The CONFIDENTIAL documents identified above may be disclosed solely for the purpose of this litigation to the following qualified persons: a, Named parties to this litigation and their present and former employees; b. Attorneys for any party engaged in this litigation and employees of such attomeys; c Experts; 2. CONFIDENTIALITY STIPULATION REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL PROPRIETARY/TRADE SECRET DOCUMENTS,Supple & Canvel LLP 2320 Marinship Way, Suite 304 Sausalito, CA 94965 d. Persons necessary to the preparation of documents, and transcription of testimony in this litigation; and e. The Court and/or the trier of fact in this litigation. CONFIDENTIAL documents shall not be disclosed to any other person. Nothing herein shall be construed to prevent the Court from disclosing any facts relied upon in making any evidentiary rulings, rulings on motions, or orders of whatever description. 5. Before disclosing “CONFIDENTIAL” material to any person falling within categories 4(a)(b)(c) and (d) above, counsel for the party making such disclosures shall advise such person that s/he shall not disclose any “CONFIDENTIAL” material to any other person, and that if he does so, s/he maybe subject to the sanctions of this Court. 6. If any party wishes to set forth any “CONFIDENTIAL” material as an exhibit or attachment to any brief, argument, filing or other proceeding before the Court or any magistrate thereof, such “CONFIDENTIAL” material shall be submitted and lodged under seal and shall be maintained by the clerk of the court under seal and such “CONFIDENTIAL” material shall not be made available to anyone other than the Court and counsel for the parties. Upon completion of the court proceeding in which the CONFIDENTIAL material is used it shall be returned to the party who submitted it. If either party believes the CONFIDENTIAL material attached as an exhibit or attachment to an brief, argument, filing or other proceeding before the court contains evidence of abuse of an elder as defined by Welfare and Institutions Code §§ 15610.30, 15610.57 and 15610.63, that party must comply with all provisions of Code of Civil Procedure §2017.320 in order to determine if the information will remain protected form disclosure by this confidentially stipulation or whether the information will become part of the public court record. 7, “CONFIDENTIAL” material may be used in connection with the examination by deposition of any witness in this litigation. Whenever “CONFIDENTIAL” material is so disclosed in a deposition, the party making such disclosure shall inform the witness, on the record, that the use of such “CONFIDENTIAL” material is subject to the terms of this confidentiality stipulation and that the witness is bound by the terms of this stipulation. If any person present at the deposition, other than the reporter, does not come within the categories of Be CONFIDENTIALITY STIPULATION REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL PROPRIETARY/TRADE SECRET DOCUMENTSSupple & Canvel LLP 2320 Marinship Way, Suite 301 Sausalito, CA 94965 persons defined in paragraph 4 of this stipulation, then that person shall not continue to be present while the “CONFIDENTIAL” material is used in that deposition. 8. The provisions of this stipulation shall continue in effect unless or until expressly released by all parties, or ordered by a court. Upon final determination of this litigation, each party shall return to the other all material in its possession and control and all copies of all “CONFIDENTIAL” documents, or shall certify under oath that all such materials have been destroyed. If the documents deemed “CONFIDENTIAL” contain evidence of abuse of an elder as defined by Welfare and Institutions Code §§ 15610.30, 15610.57 and 15610.63, the parties must comply with the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure §2017.320 with regard to the final disposition of those documents. Dated: rub . » 2011 SUPPLE AND CANVEL LLP By: y' KINDRED NURSING CENTERS WES‘ LLC dba TUNNELL CENTER FOR REHABILITATION HEALTHCARE; KINDRED HEALTHCARE OPERATING, INC.; and KINDRED HEALTHCARE, INC. Dated: A Yor 30 » 2011 MARY ALEXANDER & ASSOCIATES By: apne fv Mi Alexarder Attorneys for Plaintiffs DORA SCOTT, Individually and as Successor in Interest of Decedent Aquiles Fung, et al. 4 CONFIDENTIALITY STIPULATION REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL PROPRIETARY/TRADE SECRET DOCUMENTSSupple & Canvel LLP. 2320 Marinship Way, Suite 301 Sausalito, CA 94965 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Plaintiffs DORA SCOTT, Individually and as Successor in Interest of Decedent Aquiles Fung, et al., (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants KINDRED NURSING CENTERS WEST LLC dba TUNNELL CENTER FOR REHABILITATION HEALTHCARE; KINDRED HEALTHCARE OPERATING, INC.; and KINDRED HEALTHCARE, INC. (“Defendants”) are hereby bound to the executed Confidentiality Stipulation regarding ee Dated: att Se CONFIDENTIALITY STIPULATION REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL PROPRIETAR Y/TRADE SECRET DOCUMENTSSupple & Canvel LLP 2320 Marinship Way, Suite 301 Sausalito, CA 94965 PROOF OF SERVICE Tam a resident of the State of California, over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to the within action. My business address is: SUPPLE & CANVEL LLP, 2320 MARINSHIP WAY, SUITE 301, SAUSALITO, CA 94965, On July 5, 2011, I served the within document: CONFIDENTIALITY STIPULATION REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL PROPRIETARY/TRADE SECRET DOCUMENTS by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in United States mail in the State of California at Sausalito, addressed as set forth below. Attorneys for Plaintiffs: Mary B. Alexander, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants Jerry Warren PHD., Individually and doing business as Jennifer I. Fiore, Esq. Burlingame Family Health also known as Sophia M. Aslami, Esq. Burlingame Family Health Medical MARY ALEXANDER & ASSOCIATES Group; Diana Leykina, MD; Susan 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 1303 Failem: MD, Individually and doin San Francisco, CA 94104 Business as Burlingame Family Health Phone: (415) 433-4440 also Known as Burlingame Family Health Fax: (415) 433-5440 Medical Group James M. Goodman, Esq. Christine Pico, Esq. HASSARD BONNINGTON LLP Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94111-3993 Phone: (415) 288-9800 Fax: (415) 288-9802 I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after the date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. cf, ? ! “Tina Dang Executed on July 5, 2011 at Sausalito, California. Dora Scoti, et al. v. Kindred Nursing Centers West LLC, et al. San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC 10 502330 -6- CONFIDENTIALITY STIPULATION REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL PROPRIETARY/TRADE SECRET DOCUMENTS