arrow left
arrow right
  • SHINA PARKER VS INNOVATIVE SPEECH THERAPY AND COMMUNICATION SERVICES, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • SHINA PARKER VS INNOVATIVE SPEECH THERAPY AND COMMUNICATION SERVICES, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 11/28/2022 04:30 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by V. Sino-Cruz,Deputy Clerk JUSTIN G. SCHMIDT, SBN 248872 LAURIE M. CORTEZ, SBN 289902 EMILIO LAW GROUP, APC 12832 Valley View St., Ste. 106 Garden Grove California 92845 Telephone: (714) 379-6239 Facsimile: (714) 379-5444 Attorney for Defendant Innovative Speech Therapy and Communication Services, Inc. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SHINA PARKER, an individual Case No.: 19STCV36310 Plaintiff 10 DEFENDANT9S NOTICE OF VS. INTENTION TO MOVE FOR 11 JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING INNOVATIVE SPEECH THERAPY AND THE VERDICT, AND TO VACATE 12 COMMUNICATION SERVICES, INC., a THE JUDGMENT California corporation; and DOES I through 13 20, inclusive, Date: To be set by the Court Time: Tobe set b the Court 14 Defendants. Dept: 51 15 (Filed Concurrently with Defendant's Notice of Intention to Move for New Trial or in the Alternative, Modification of the Verdict) 17 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 18 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that INNOVATIVE SPEECH THERAPY AND 19 COMMUNICATION SERVICES, INC. will move this Court to set aside the judgment entered 20 on November 10, 2022, and to enter judgment in favor of Defendant Innovative Speech Therapy 21 and Communication Services, Inc. notwithstanding the verdict rendered by the Jury on 22 September 8, 2022, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 629. The Motion will be heard 23 in Dept. 51 of the above-entitled court located at 111 North Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012 at a time and date to be set by the Court for the hearing of the concurrently-filed motion for New Trial, as prescribed by Code of Civil Procedure Sections 629(b), 660, and 661. 26 This Motion is made under the provisions of CCP I'I629, 659 and 663, and is based upon 27 the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to support the jury's verdict. Plaintiff did not 28 offer substantial evidence to support the verdict as to damages, the trial evidence is legally -I— DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF INTENTION TO MOVE FOR JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT, AND TO VACATE THE JUDGMENT F 114 74 GVe 9 Ayc, 12832 valleyvle sl eer, s lee led, Garden &9 e, casfomia92843,Pae e (7147379 4239, Fa (7147379 3444