On October 10, 2019 a
Motion,Ex Parte
was filed
involving a dispute between
Parker Shina,
and
Innovative Speech Therapy And Communication Services Inc. A California Corporation,
Parker Shina,
for Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 11/28/2022 04:30 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by V. Sino-Cruz,Deputy Clerk
JUSTIN G. SCHMIDT, SBN 248872
LAURIE M. CORTEZ, SBN 289902
EMILIO LAW GROUP, APC
12832 Valley View St., Ste. 106
Garden Grove California 92845
Telephone: (714) 379-6239
Facsimile: (714) 379-5444
Attorney for Defendant
Innovative Speech Therapy and Communication Services, Inc.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
SHINA PARKER, an individual Case No.: 19STCV36310
Plaintiff
10 DEFENDANT9S NOTICE OF
VS. INTENTION TO MOVE FOR
11 JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING
INNOVATIVE SPEECH THERAPY AND THE VERDICT, AND TO VACATE
12 COMMUNICATION SERVICES, INC., a THE JUDGMENT
California corporation; and DOES I through
13 20, inclusive, Date: To be set by the Court
Time: Tobe set b the Court
14 Defendants. Dept: 51
15 (Filed Concurrently with Defendant's Notice
of Intention to Move for New Trial or in the
Alternative, Modification of the Verdict)
17 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
18 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that INNOVATIVE SPEECH THERAPY AND
19 COMMUNICATION SERVICES, INC. will move this Court to set aside the judgment entered
20 on November 10, 2022, and to enter judgment in favor of Defendant Innovative Speech Therapy
21 and Communication Services, Inc. notwithstanding the verdict rendered by the Jury on
22 September 8, 2022, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 629. The Motion will be heard
23 in Dept. 51 of the above-entitled court located at 111 North Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012 at a
time and date to be set by the Court for the hearing of the concurrently-filed motion for New
Trial, as prescribed by Code of Civil Procedure Sections 629(b), 660, and 661.
26 This Motion is made under the provisions of CCP I'I629, 659 and 663, and is based upon
27 the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to support the jury's verdict. Plaintiff did not
28 offer substantial evidence to support the verdict as to damages, the trial evidence is legally
-I—
DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF INTENTION TO MOVE FOR JUDGMENT
NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT, AND TO VACATE THE JUDGMENT
F 114 74 GVe 9 Ayc, 12832 valleyvle sl eer, s lee led, Garden &9 e, casfomia92843,Pae e (7147379 4239, Fa (7147379 3444
Document Filed Date
November 28, 2022
Case Filing Date
October 10, 2019
Category
Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Jury Verdict 10/11/2023
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.