arrow left
arrow right
  • STEVE MATTA VS TMX FINANCE OF CALIFORNIA, INC. Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • STEVE MATTA VS TMX FINANCE OF CALIFORNIA, INC. Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 08/30/2019 03:33 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Tran,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY SABRINA L. SHAD!. SBN 205405: VARTAN S. MADOYAN. SBN 279015 BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 11601 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1400 Los Angeles, CA 90025-0509 TELEPHONE NO.: 310.820.8800 FAX NO. (Optional): 310.820.8859 E-MAILADDREss 1optiona1J: sshadi@bakerlaw.com; vmadoyan@bakerlaw.com ATTORNEY FOR/Name): TMX FINANCE OF CALIFORNIA, INC.; TITLEMAX OF CALIFORNIA, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Norwalk STREET ADDREss: 12720 Norwalk Blvd MAILING ADDRESS: cITY AND zIP coDE: Norwalk, CA 90650 BRANCH NAME: PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: STEVE MATTA DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: TMX FINANCE OF CALIFORNIA, INC.; TITLEMAX OF CALIFORNIA, INC., et. al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: 19NWCV00176 (Check one): ~ UNLIMITED CASE O LIMITED CASE (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: 09/16/2019 Time: 1:30 pm Dept.: F Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): ~ Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Vartan S. Madoyan INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. D This statement is submitted by party (name): b. ~ This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): TMX FINANCE OF CALIFORNIA, INC.; TITLEMAX OF CALIFORNIA, INC. 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): b. D The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. D All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. D The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) D have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) D have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) D have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. D The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in ~ complaint D cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Plaintiff alleges representative action claims under the California Private Attorneys General Act ("PAGA"). Page 1 of5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720-3.730 CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov American LegalNet, Inc. h www.FonnsWorkFlow.cm:n ~jP