On February 20, 2019 a
Case Management Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Godinez Johana Maz,
Matta Steve,
and
Titlemax Of California Inc.,
Titlemax Of California Inc. A Delaware Corporation,
Tmx Finance Of California Inc.,
for Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 08/30/2019 03:33 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Tran,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
SABRINA L. SHAD!. SBN 205405: VARTAN S. MADOYAN. SBN 279015
BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
11601 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1400
Los Angeles, CA 90025-0509
TELEPHONE NO.: 310.820.8800 FAX NO. (Optional): 310.820.8859
E-MAILADDREss 1optiona1J: sshadi@bakerlaw.com; vmadoyan@bakerlaw.com
ATTORNEY FOR/Name): TMX FINANCE OF CALIFORNIA, INC.; TITLEMAX OF
CALIFORNIA, INC.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Norwalk
STREET ADDREss: 12720 Norwalk Blvd
MAILING ADDRESS:
cITY AND zIP coDE: Norwalk, CA 90650
BRANCH NAME:
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: STEVE MATTA
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: TMX FINANCE OF CALIFORNIA, INC.; TITLEMAX OF
CALIFORNIA, INC., et. al.
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
19NWCV00176
(Check one): ~ UNLIMITED CASE O LIMITED CASE
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: 09/16/2019 Time: 1:30 pm Dept.: F Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
~ Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Vartan S. Madoyan
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. D This statement is submitted by party (name):
b. ~ This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): TMX FINANCE OF CALIFORNIA, INC.; TITLEMAX OF
CALIFORNIA, INC.
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date):
b. D The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. D All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. D The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) D have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) D have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) D have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. D The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in ~ complaint D cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Plaintiff alleges representative action claims under the California Private Attorneys General Act ("PAGA").
Page 1 of5
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court,
Judicial Council of California
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720-3.730
CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov
American LegalNet, Inc. h
www.FonnsWorkFlow.cm:n ~jP
Document Filed Date
August 30, 2019
Case Filing Date
February 20, 2019
Category
Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.