arrow left
arrow right
  • CATHERINE COTE VS DONNA KATHRYN COTE ET AL Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • CATHERINE COTE VS DONNA KATHRYN COTE ET AL Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

DECLARATIONOP ANTHONYB. GORDON I, ANTHONYB. GORDON, declare: l. I am the attorney of record for defendant and cross-complainant Donna Kathryn Cote ("Donna" ) in the above entitled action and the facts set forth below are true and correct and within my own personal knowledge and belief. 2. This declaration is made in opposition to the ex parte application to vacate the present trial date of May 28, 2019. As appears below, there is no good cause to continue the trial date and this application is nothing more than a strategy to delay this matter going to trial on May 28, 2019. 10 3. The plaintiffin the instant action is Catherine Cote ("Catherine" ), the mother of defendant John A. Cote ("John" ) and future ex mother-in-law of Donna. On 12 August 10, Catherine filed the present action claiming that her son and daughter-in-law 13 owe her $ 427,500 pursuant to a series of oral agreements during the period March 6, 2006 14 to October 17, 2008. As stated in Donna's verified answer, she denies that any such 15 agreement existed, denies that any monies transferred to her or John were loans, and on 16 that basis denies that she is indebted to Catherine as alleged in the main action. 17 4. On October 12, 2018, Donna filed a cross-complaint against John seeking a judicial determination of the parties'ights and obligations concerning the alleged loans 19 since Donna contends that any money Catherine advanced to John were gifts and were not 20 required to be paid back. The cross-complaint was served on John on October 24, 2018. 21 5. John failed to respond to his mother's complaint against him or to Donna's 22 cross-complaint, despite his requests to me for extensions so he could retain counsel. By 23 January 3, 2019, John had still not retained counsel or filed a responsive pleading, and I 24 filed a Request for Entry of Default against him. 25 6. Catherine's attorney Richard Marcus and I both attended the Case 26 Management Conference on January 8, 2019, in this Dept. 15. I explained to the Court 27 that I had entered John's default, and the Court then set the trial date for May 28, 2019. 28 John then appeared in pro per and explained to the judge that he was in the process of I DECLARATIONOF ANTHONY GORDON