arrow left
arrow right
  • STEVEN WEISBERG ET AL VS ALEXANDER KWONG TOMIZO HOM ET AL Premise Liability (e.g., dangerous conditions of property, slip/trip and fall, dog attack, etc.) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • STEVEN WEISBERG ET AL VS ALEXANDER KWONG TOMIZO HOM ET AL Premise Liability (e.g., dangerous conditions of property, slip/trip and fall, dog attack, etc.) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 09/17/2020 09:47 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Reyna,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Walter Rodriguez, SBN 131423 MARK R. WEINER & ASSOCIATES 655 North Central Avenue, 12th Floor Glendale, California 91203-1434 TELEPHONE NO.: (818) 543-4000 FAX NO. (Optional): (855) 396-3606 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): Cali.Law-Glendale@StateFarm.c9om ATTORNEY FOR (Name): defendant and cross-complainant Gini Wong Rogers SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: 312 North Spring Street MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles, CA 90012 BRANCH NAME: Los Angeles - Spring Street Superior PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Steven Weisberg, Et al. DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Alexander Kwong Tomizo Hom, Et al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: BC697668 (Check one): ~ UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE (Amount demanded □ (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: September 30, 2020 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: F49 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): ~ Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Walter Rodriguez INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. ~ This statement is submitted by party (name): defendant and cross-complainant Gini Wong Rogers b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): □ 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): December 20, 2018 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. xx □ All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint □ (1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not): □ (2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): □ (3) have had a default entered against them (specify names): □ c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which □ they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.720–3.730 CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com