arrow left
arrow right
  • STEVEN WEISBERG ET AL VS ALEXANDER KWONG TOMIZO HOM ET AL Premise Liability (e.g., dangerous conditions of property, slip/trip and fall, dog attack, etc.) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • STEVEN WEISBERG ET AL VS ALEXANDER KWONG TOMIZO HOM ET AL Premise Liability (e.g., dangerous conditions of property, slip/trip and fall, dog attack, etc.) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

V 1 ' ' 1 D . i A i y‘ I l 1 LAW OFFICE or TIMOTHY J. O'SHEA‘ BY: Dee Bartholomew -— BARNO 188861 EPHLED I 2 A“°me3’S At Law . Superior Court of California 3 ’ 02 1 I 4 Allarneys & Supporl S!a'are Employees of . 20 8 5 GEICOSIa'Counsel Department Shem. ‘ner, IAUCLIIIVO UNI Ul0l’l( lift Telephone: 818/956-9100 ByJ A ‘N . Depu 5 Fax: 818/956-9191 "‘“ L°‘??.». ._ 7 Attorneys for Defendant, ALEXANDER HOM, 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES UNLIMITED JURISDICTION g 10 55c ‘7 STEVEN WEISBERG; TERRY WEISBERG; CASE NO. BC697668 11 KASEYNAVARRO, 12 ANSWER TO COMPLAINT «s a PLAINTIFF, X 14 VS. >2 15 ALEXANDER KWONG TOMIZO HOM; @ GINI WONG ROGERS; CRYSTAL LEE 16 COMBS AND DOES 1 THROUGH 50, . 1 INCLUSIVE, 7 18 DEFENDANTS. 19 COMES NOW defendant, ALEXANDER HOM, and answers the complaint of 20 plaintiff, KASEY NAVARRO, STEVEN WEISBERG, TERRY OLMSTEAD-WEISBERG, 21 , as follows: 22 Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 431.30, this answering defendant denies both generally and specically, each and every allegation contained in each 23 24 and every paragraph of said complaint; defendant further denies that plaintif has been mg. 25 damaged in any sum or sums whatsoever, or at all, whether it is alleged in plaintiffs 26 complaint or otherwise. 7 27 FIRST AFFIRMATIVB DEFENSE 28 Page 1 ANSWER TO COMPLAINT