On December 14, 2017 a
Response - RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS EX PARTE APPLICATION RE RECALL ELECTION ETC.
was filed
involving a dispute between
Tarzana Planza Condominiums Association,
Tarzana Plaza Condominiums Association A California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation,
and
Brenninkmeijer Pascal,
Pathi Aryeh,
Saal Eugene,
Schultz Rubicella,
Weiss Judy,
for Other Real Property (not eminent domain, landlord/tenant, foreclosure) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 04/13/2022 10:56 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. Inloes,Deputy Clerk
Matthew J. Eandi (SBN 279734)
1 meandi@effirm.com
EANDI FITZPATRICK LLP
2 2600 W. Olive Ave. Ste 5410
Burbank, CA 910506
3 Telephone: (213) 347-5686
4 Attorneys for Plaintiff
Tarzana Plaza Condominiums Association
5
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
6
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – NORTHWEST DISTRICT
7
8 TARZANA PLAZA CONDOMINIUMS CASE NO.: LC106595
ASSOCIATION, a California nonprofit
9 mutual benefit corporation, Assigned for all purposes to
Hon. Huey P. Cotton, Department A
10 Plaintiff,
v. PLAINTIFF’S FURTHER RESPONSE
11 TO DEFENDANTS’ OMNIBUS EX
EUGENE SAAL, an individual; RUBICELIA PARTE APPLICATIONS FOR
12 SCHULTZ, an individual; JUDY WEISS, an VIOLATIONS RE: RECALL ELECTION
individual; PASCAL BRENNINKMEIJER, NOTICE; FORECLOSURES;
13 an individual; ARYEH PATHI, an individual; DOCUMENT REQUESTS;
and DOES 1-25, inclusive, COMMINGLING OF FUNDS
14
Defendants. Date: 04/13/2022
15 Time: 8:30 a.m.
Dept: A
16
Action Filed: 12/14/2017
17 Trial Date: Not Applicable
18
***THIS MATTER WAS NOT HEARD AT 8:30AM DUE TO A MISUNDERSTANDING
19
BETWEEN MR. EANDI AND MR. SAAL REGARDING THE TIME OF TODAY’S
20
HEARING. AS MR. EANDI WAS SUBMITTING THIS RESPONSE AROUND 9:30AM,
21
MR. SAAL AND MR. EANDI SPOKE VIA TELEPHONE WHEREUPON THE
22
MISCOMMUNICATION WAS BROUGHT TO LIGHT. THE PARTIES HAVE SINCE
23
CONFIRMED MUTUAL AVAILABILITY TO APPEAR TODAY AT 1:30PM PROVIDED
24
THE COURT’S SCHEDULE PERMITS AND THE COURT WOULD BE WILLING TO
25
GRANT THIS EXCEPTIONAL REQUEST ON THIS TIME-SENSITIVE MATTER***
26
27
28
PLAINTIFF’S FURTHER RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ OMNIBUS EX PARTE APPLICATIONS
FOR VIOLATIONS RE: RECALL ELECTION NOTICE; FORECLOSURES; DOCUMENT REQUESTS;
COMMINGLING OF FUNDS
Document Filed Date
April 13, 2022
Case Filing Date
December 14, 2017
Category
Other Real Property (not eminent domain, landlord/tenant, foreclosure) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 04/13/2022 10:56 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. Inloes,Deputy Clerk Matthew J. Eandi (SBN 279734) 1 meandi@effirm.com EANDI FITZPATRICK LLP 2 2600 W. Olive Ave. Ste 5410 Burbank, CA 910506 3 Telephone: (213) 347-5686 4 Attorneys for Plaintiff Tarzana Plaza Condominiums Association 5 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 6 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – NORTHWEST DISTRICT 7 8 TARZANA PLAZA CONDOMINIUMS CASE NO.: LC106595 ASSOCIATION, a California nonprofit 9 mutual benefit corporation, Assigned for all purposes to Hon. Huey P. Cotton, Department A 10 Plaintiff, v. PLAINTIFF’S FURTHER RESPONSE 11 TO DEFENDANTS’ OMNIBUS EX EUGENE SAAL, an individual; RUBICELIA PARTE APPLICATIONS FOR 12 SCHULTZ, an individual; JUDY WEISS, an VIOLATIONS RE: RECALL ELECTION individual; PASCAL BRENNINKMEIJER, NOTICE; FORECLOSURES; 13 an individual; ARYEH PATHI, an individual; DOCUMENT REQUESTS; and DOES 1-25, inclusive, COMMINGLING OF FUNDS 14 Defendants. Date: 04/13/2022 15 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept: A 16 Action Filed: 12/14/2017 17 Trial Date: Not Applicable 18 ***THIS MATTER WAS NOT HEARD AT 8:30AM DUE TO A MISUNDERSTANDING 19 BETWEEN MR. EANDI AND MR. SAAL REGARDING THE TIME OF TODAY’S 20 HEARING. AS MR. EANDI WAS SUBMITTING THIS RESPONSE AROUND 9:30AM, 21 MR. SAAL AND MR. EANDI SPOKE VIA TELEPHONE WHEREUPON THE 22 MISCOMMUNICATION WAS BROUGHT TO LIGHT. THE PARTIES HAVE SINCE 23 CONFIRMED MUTUAL AVAILABILITY TO APPEAR TODAY AT 1:30PM PROVIDED 24 THE COURT’S SCHEDULE PERMITS AND THE COURT WOULD BE WILLING TO 25 GRANT THIS EXCEPTIONAL REQUEST ON THIS TIME-SENSITIVE MATTER*** 26 27 28 PLAINTIFF’S FURTHER RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ OMNIBUS EX PARTE APPLICATIONS FOR VIOLATIONS RE: RECALL ELECTION NOTICE; FORECLOSURES; DOCUMENT REQUESTS; COMMINGLING OF FUNDS