arrow left
arrow right
  • SCHLOMO SCHMUEL  VS. CASPAR MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • SCHLOMO SCHMUEL  VS. CASPAR MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 03/26/2019 10:35 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J . Hall,Deputy Clerk Law Offices of Barak Isaacs Barak Isaacs SB#196916 18757 Burbank Boulevard Suite 215 Tarzana, California 91356 Telephone: (818) 344-4175 Facsimile: (818) 344-1546 Attorneys for Defendant, Caspar Management Co., LLC (sued as Caspar Management Group, LLC) SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SCHLOMO SCHMUEL, an individual; Case No.: LC106625 10 SCHLOMO SCHMUEL D.P.M, INC., a California Corporation, Related to Case Number LC103145 11 Plaintiff, (assigned to the Honorable Michael J. Convey) 12 VS. CONSOLIDATED REPLY TO OPPOSITION 13 TO MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER CASPAR MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC, a RESPONSES TO SPECIAL 14 California limited liability company; and INTERROGATORIES, DECLARATION OF BARAK ISAACS IN SUPPORT 15 DOES 1-10 inclusive, THEREOF 16 Date: April 3, 2019 Defendants 17 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept: U 18 Reservation Numbers: 625249847156, a9) 871982716584 20 2:1, Defendant Caspar Management Co., LLC (“Defendant”) respectfully submits the 22 following consolidated reply to Plaintiffs’ oppositions to Defendant’s motions to compel further 23 responses to special interrogatories. 24 It is undisputed that Plaintiffs’ counsel agreed to provide supplemental responses to the 25 26 subject interrogatories by December 26, 2018 and failed to do so. It is also undisputed that Consolidated Reply Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories - 1