arrow left
arrow right
  • ANDREW RODRIGUEZ VS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • ANDREW RODRIGUEZ VS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 07/16/2019 06:30 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by R. Sanchez,Deputy Clerk Alan J. Romero (SBN 249000) 1 ROMERO LAW, APC 80 S. Lake Avenue Suite 880 2 Pasadena, CA 91101-2672 Telephone: (626) 396-9900 3 Facsimile: (626) 270-4045 Email: firm@romerolaw.com 4 Attorney for Plaintiff 5 ANDREW RODRIGUEZ 6 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 8 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT 9 10 11 ANDREW RODRIGUEZ, an individual, Case No.: BC680213 12 Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO 13 vs. MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 8 14 Dept. 52 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a political Judge: Hon. Susan Bryant-Deason 15 subdivision of the State of California, 16 Date: July 17, 2019 Time: 8:30 AM Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 TO ALL PARTIES AND THE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD FOR EACH PARTY: 22 Comes now the Plaintiff ANDREW RODRIGUEZ (heretofore “Plaintiff”) where hereby 23 respectfully submits this instant Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant 24 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES (heretofore “Defendant”). 25 This Motion in Limine seeks declarations of existing law. Such motions “which would 26 merely be declaratory of existing law” are improper. Kelly v. New West Federal Savings (1996) 27 49 Cal.App.4th 670. 28 1 PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 8