On October 19, 2017 a
Motion,Ex Parte
was filed
involving a dispute between
Rodriguez Andrew,
and
County Of Los Angeles,
Rodriguez Andrew,
for Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 07/16/2019 06:40 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by R. Sanchez,Deputy Clerk
Alan J. Romero (SBN 249000)
1 ROMERO LAW, APC
80 S. Lake Avenue Suite 880
2 Pasadena, CA 91101-2672
Telephone: (626) 396-9900
3 Facsimile: (626) 270-4045
Email: firm@romerolaw.com
4
Attorney for Plaintiff
5 ANDREW RODRIGUEZ
6
7
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
8
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
9
10
11 ANDREW RODRIGUEZ, an individual, Case No.: BC680213
12 Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO
13 vs. MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 13
14 Dept. 52
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a political Judge: Hon. Susan Bryant-Deason
15 subdivision of the State of California,
16 Date: July 17, 2019
Time: 8:30 AM
Defendant.
17
18
19
20
21
TO ALL PARTIES AND THE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD FOR EACH PARTY:
22
Comes now the Plaintiff ANDREW RODRIGUEZ (heretofore “Plaintiff”) where hereby
23
respectfully submits this instant Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant
24
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES (heretofore “Defendant”).
25
This Motion in Limine seeks declarations of existing law. Such motions “which would
26
merely be declaratory of existing law” are improper. Kelly v. New West Federal Savings (1996)
27
49 Cal.App.4th 670.
28
1
PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 8