On January 13, 2016 a
Party Discovery
was filed
involving a dispute between
Williams, Edwin,
Wilson, Desabian Keith,
and
Button, Donjonique,
Cooper, Ashley,
County Of San Bernardino,
County Of San Bernardino, A Public Entity,
Deputy Brown, Individually And In His Official Capacity,
Deputy Chambers, Individually And In His Official Capacity,
Deputy Frias, Individually And In His Offical Capacity As,
Deputy K. Rodriguezindividually And In His Official Capacity,
Deputy Lim, Indivually And In His Official Capacity As,
Deputy Silva, Individually And In His Official Capacity,
San Bernardino County Sheriff'S Department,
San Bernardino County Sheriff'S Department A Public Entity,
Sergeant Thornburg,Individually And In His Official Capacity,
West Valley Detention Center,
West Valley Detention Center, A San Bernardino County Jail,
Frias, Juan,
Rodriguez, Kenneth,
Silva Jr., Joseph,
for Miscellaneous Petition
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
Yana I L E_D _
G. Henriks, Esq. (SBN 250638) SUPERIORFCG ea‘r o; chggmm
Email: yhenriks@1aw-rnh.com COUNTY 0F SAN 35.35%”er
SAN BERMARWQ f.
.4
w .
McMURRAY HENRIKS, LLP
811 Wilshire B1Vd., Suite 1640 APR 2 6 2523
Los Angeles, California 90017
\OOOQOKIl-RUJNp—I
Telephone: (323) 93 1 -6200
Facsimile: (323) 93 1 -9521
vafimiggfi
mm
~ 3
STRO-
7
DESABIAN KEITH WILSON,
Attorneys for Plaintiff, as successor in interest to deceased
Plaintiff EDWIN WILLIAMS
ADAM L. MIEDERHOFF, CA Bar N0. 261 91 3
Deputy County Counsel
TOM BUNTON, CA Bar N0. 193560
County Counsel
385 North Arrowhead Avenue, Fourth Floor
San Bernardino, CA 92415-0140
Telephone: (909) 387-5455
1640 Facsimile: (909) 387-4069
LLP
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO and KENNETH RODRIGUEZ
SUITE
90017 Attorneys for Defendants,
HENRIKS,
CA
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BOULEVARD,
ANGELES,
MCMURRAY
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CENTRAL DIVISION
WILSHIRE
Los
NNNNNNNNNb—Ap—AHp—Ap—Ip—tr—A—Ap—Ap—l
DESABIAN KEITH WILSON, as successor in CASE NO. CIVDS 1 600447
811
interest to deceased Plaintiff EDWIN
WILLIAMS, an individual; PLAINTIFF’S DESIGNATION OF
DEPOSITION TESTIMONY, AND
OOQQMAUJNHOOOONOMAUJNHO
Plaintiff,
V.
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, et a1,
[ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES THE HON.
Defendants.
JANETM FRANGIE, DEPT. S29]
Trial Date: May 1, 2023
Time: 10:00 am.
Dept: 829
TO THE HONORABLE COURT AND TO THE PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL
OF RECORD:
-1-
PLAINTIFF’S DESIGNATION OF DEPOSITION TESTIMONY, AND DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Plaintiff DESABIAN KEITH WILSON, as successor
in interest t0 deceased Plaintiff EDWIN WILLIAMS, hereby designates the following portions of
the May 22, 201 8, videotaped deposition 0f EDWIN WILLIAMS which Plaintiff currently expects
t0 read into evidence, and display t0 the jury, at trial:
\OOOQQUI-hwwr—n
13:20-19:24 No objection
22:19-23:13 N0 objection
24:3-26z7 No objection
26:11-35:13 Object to lines 29:14-30:24: irrelevant and
1640
LLP
highly prejudicial, Evidence Code 352.
SUITE
90017
HENRIKS,
CA
BOULEVARD,
Object to lines 3 1 1-4: as irrelevant and highly
:
ANGELES,
prejudicial, Evidence Code 352.
MCMURRAY
WILSHIRE
L05
NNNNNNNNNHHHHp—t—AHp—Ap—Ip—I
811 Object t0 lines 32:1-7 (*see delineation):
OOQONMAWNHowooflQM-hWNHO
irrelevant and highly prejudicial, Evidence
Code 352; and hearsay, Evidence Code 1200.
Object t0 lines 32:18-33:19: irrelevant and
highly prejudicial, Evidence Code 352; and
hearsay, Evidence Code 1200.
Object t0 lines 34:5-35213: irrelevant and
highly prejudicial, Evidence Code 352.
-2-
PLAINTIFF’S DESIGNATION OF DEPOSITION TESTIMONY, AND DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE
Document Filed Date
April 26, 2023
Case Filing Date
January 13, 2016
Category
Miscellaneous Petition
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Yana I L E_D _ G. Henriks, Esq. (SBN 250638) SUPERIORFCG ea‘r o; chggmm Email: yhenriks@1aw-rnh.com COUNTY 0F SAN 35.35%”er SAN BERMARWQ f. .4 w . McMURRAY HENRIKS, LLP 811 Wilshire B1Vd., Suite 1640 APR 2 6 2523 Los Angeles, California 90017 \OOOQOKIl-RUJNp—I Telephone: (323) 93 1 -6200 Facsimile: (323) 93 1 -9521 vafimiggfi mm ~ 3 STRO- 7 DESABIAN KEITH WILSON, Attorneys for Plaintiff, as successor in interest to deceased Plaintiff EDWIN WILLIAMS ADAM L. MIEDERHOFF, CA Bar N0. 261 91 3 Deputy County Counsel TOM BUNTON, CA Bar N0. 193560 County Counsel 385 North Arrowhead Avenue, Fourth Floor San Bernardino, CA 92415-0140 Telephone: (909) 387-5455 1640 Facsimile: (909) 387-4069 LLP COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO and KENNETH RODRIGUEZ SUITE 90017 Attorneys for Defendants, HENRIKS, CA SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BOULEVARD, ANGELES, MCMURRAY COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CENTRAL DIVISION WILSHIRE Los NNNNNNNNNb—Ap—AHp—Ap—Ip—tr—A—Ap—Ap—l DESABIAN KEITH WILSON, as successor in CASE NO. CIVDS 1 600447 811 interest to deceased Plaintiff EDWIN WILLIAMS, an individual; PLAINTIFF’S DESIGNATION OF DEPOSITION TESTIMONY, AND OOQQMAUJNHOOOONOMAUJNHO Plaintiff, V. DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, et a1, [ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES THE HON. Defendants. JANETM FRANGIE, DEPT. S29] Trial Date: May 1, 2023 Time: 10:00 am. Dept: 829 TO THE HONORABLE COURT AND TO THE PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: -1- PLAINTIFF’S DESIGNATION OF DEPOSITION TESTIMONY, AND DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Plaintiff DESABIAN KEITH WILSON, as successor in interest t0 deceased Plaintiff EDWIN WILLIAMS, hereby designates the following portions of the May 22, 201 8, videotaped deposition 0f EDWIN WILLIAMS which Plaintiff currently expects t0 read into evidence, and display t0 the jury, at trial: \OOOQQUI-hwwr—n 13:20-19:24 No objection 22:19-23:13 N0 objection 24:3-26z7 No objection 26:11-35:13 Object to lines 29:14-30:24: irrelevant and 1640 LLP highly prejudicial, Evidence Code 352. SUITE 90017 HENRIKS, CA BOULEVARD, Object to lines 3 1 1-4: as irrelevant and highly : ANGELES, prejudicial, Evidence Code 352. MCMURRAY WILSHIRE L05 NNNNNNNNNHHHHp—t—AHp—Ap—Ip—I 811 Object t0 lines 32:1-7 (*see delineation): OOQONMAWNHowooflQM-hWNHO irrelevant and highly prejudicial, Evidence Code 352; and hearsay, Evidence Code 1200. Object t0 lines 32:18-33:19: irrelevant and highly prejudicial, Evidence Code 352; and hearsay, Evidence Code 1200. Object t0 lines 34:5-35213: irrelevant and highly prejudicial, Evidence Code 352. -2- PLAINTIFF’S DESIGNATION OF DEPOSITION TESTIMONY, AND DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE