arrow left
arrow right
  • JOSE MANUEL DULANTO VS ARCHBISHOP WILLIAM E LORI ET AL Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JOSE MANUEL DULANTO VS ARCHBISHOP WILLIAM E LORI ET AL Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 12/05/2022 04:01 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by V. Sino-Cruz,Deputy Clerk 1 AARON A. BUCKLEY (SBN 202081) abuckley@paulplevin.com 2 KELLY M. BUTLER (SBN 342394) kbutler@paulplevin.com 3 PAUL, PLEVIN, SULLIVAN & CONNAUGHTON LLP 101 West Broadway, Ninth Floor 4 San Diego, California 92101-8285 Telephone: 619-237-5200 5 Facsimile: 619-615-0700 6 Attorneys for Defendant KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 8 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT 9 10 JOSE MANUEL DULANTO, Case No. BC656164 11 Plaintiff, DEFENDANT KNIGHTS OF 12 COLUMBUS’S NOTICE OF MOTION TO v. MOVE FOR A JUDGMENT 13 NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT ARCHBISHOP WILLIAM E. LORI, (JNOV) 14 ARCHBISHOP JOSE H. GOMEZ, JOSEPH MARTIN GUTIERREZ, BETH ELFREY, Date: February 16, 2023 15 CARL A. ANDERSON, STEVE OWENS, Time: 8:30 a.m. KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS, AND DOES 1 - 16 100, INCLUSIVE, Reservation No.: 123224772337 17 Defendants. Judge: Hon. Terry Green Dept.: 14 18 Action Filed: April 3, 2017 Trial Date: September 19, 2022 19 20 TO PLAINTIFF JOSE MANUEL DULANTO: 21 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT on February 16, 2023, at 8:30 a.m. in Department 14 of 22 the Los Angeles County Superior Court located at 111 N. Hill Street, Los Angeles, California, 23 90012, Defendant Knights of Columbus (“KofC”) intends to and does hereby move this Court to 24 enter judgment in favor of the moving party notwithstanding the verdict rendered by the jury on 25 September 29, 2022. 26 This motion is made on the ground that the evidence received at trial is insufficient as a 27 matter of law to support the jury’s verdict; and that a motion for directed verdict in favor of the 28 moving party should have been granted during trial. PAUL, PLEVIN, SULLIVAN & DEFENDANT KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS’S NOTICE OF MOTION TO MOVE FOR A JUDGMENT CONNAUGHTON LLP NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT (JNOV)