On February 02, 2017 a
Motion,Ex Parte
was filed
involving a dispute between
Dulanto Jose Manuel,
and
Anderson Carl A.,
Buckley Aaron A. Doe 1,
Elfrey Beth,
Gomez Jose H. Archbishop,
Gutierrez Joseph Martin,
Gutierrez Judgment Of Dismissal Joseph Martin,
Knights Of Columbus,
Literte Ernesto,
Literte Ernesto Doe 5,
Lori Archbishop William E.,
Lori William E. Archbishop,
Owens Judgment Of Dismissal Steve,
Owens Steve,
Paul Plevin Sullivan & Connaughton Llp Doe 2,
Simpson David B. Doe 3,
Wolflick Simpson Khachaturian & Bouayad Doe 4,
for Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 12/05/2022 04:01 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by V. Sino-Cruz,Deputy Clerk
1 AARON A. BUCKLEY (SBN 202081)
abuckley@paulplevin.com
2 KELLY M. BUTLER (SBN 342394)
kbutler@paulplevin.com
3 PAUL, PLEVIN, SULLIVAN & CONNAUGHTON LLP
101 West Broadway, Ninth Floor
4 San Diego, California 92101-8285
Telephone: 619-237-5200
5 Facsimile: 619-615-0700
6 Attorneys for Defendant KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS
7
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
8
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT
9
10
JOSE MANUEL DULANTO, Case No. BC656164
11
Plaintiff, DEFENDANT KNIGHTS OF
12 COLUMBUS’S NOTICE OF MOTION TO
v. MOVE FOR A JUDGMENT
13 NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT
ARCHBISHOP WILLIAM E. LORI, (JNOV)
14 ARCHBISHOP JOSE H. GOMEZ, JOSEPH
MARTIN GUTIERREZ, BETH ELFREY, Date: February 16, 2023
15 CARL A. ANDERSON, STEVE OWENS, Time: 8:30 a.m.
KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS, AND DOES 1 -
16 100, INCLUSIVE, Reservation No.: 123224772337
17 Defendants. Judge: Hon. Terry Green
Dept.: 14
18 Action Filed: April 3, 2017
Trial Date: September 19, 2022
19
20 TO PLAINTIFF JOSE MANUEL DULANTO:
21 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT on February 16, 2023, at 8:30 a.m. in Department 14 of
22 the Los Angeles County Superior Court located at 111 N. Hill Street, Los Angeles, California,
23 90012, Defendant Knights of Columbus (“KofC”) intends to and does hereby move this Court to
24 enter judgment in favor of the moving party notwithstanding the verdict rendered by the jury on
25 September 29, 2022.
26 This motion is made on the ground that the evidence received at trial is insufficient as a
27 matter of law to support the jury’s verdict; and that a motion for directed verdict in favor of the
28 moving party should have been granted during trial.
PAUL, PLEVIN,
SULLIVAN & DEFENDANT KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS’S NOTICE OF MOTION TO MOVE FOR A JUDGMENT
CONNAUGHTON LLP NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT (JNOV)
Document Filed Date
December 05, 2022
Case Filing Date
February 02, 2017
Category
Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.