arrow left
arrow right
  • CYNTHIA MEYER VS FARMERS FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS LLC ET AL Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • CYNTHIA MEYER VS FARMERS FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS LLC ET AL Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 02/07/2022 02:07 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Bolden,Deputy Clerk 1 THARPE & HOWELL, LLP 15250 Ventura Boulevard, Ninth Floor 2 Sherman Oaks, California 91403 (818) 205-9955; (818) 205-9944 fax 3 CHRISTOPHER S. MAILE, ESQ.; STATE BAR NO.: 117998 4 SEAN P. DUCAR, ESQ.; STATE BAR NO.: 295541 5 Attorneys for Defendants, FARMERS FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, LLC; FFS HOLDING, LLC 6 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL 10 11 CYNTHIA MEYER, Case No. BC625867 12 Plaintiff, Complaint Filed: July 5, 2016 Civil Unlimited Jurisdiction 13 v. [Assigned to the Hon. Robert B. Broadbelt, Department 53] 14 FARMERS FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, LLC, FFS HOLDING, LLC, COURTNEY DEFENDANTS FARMERS FINANCIAL 15 SAYE, JOHN MUETING, and DOES 1 to SOLUTIONS, LLC AND FFS HOLDING, 100, inclusive, LLC’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 6 TO 16 EXCLUDE EVIDENCE REGARDING Defendants. PLAINTIFF’S NOVEMBER 2014 LEAVE OF 17 ABSENCE 18 Filed Concurrently With [PROPOSED] Order 19 FSC Date: March 4, 2022 Time: 11:00 a.m. 20 Dept.: 53 21 Trial: March 23, 2022 22 TO THE HONORABLE COURT, TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS 23 OF RECORD: 24 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on March 4, 2022 at 11:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the 25 matter may be heard in Department 53 of the Los Angeles County Superior Court – Stanley Mosk 26 Courthouse located at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, defendants FARMERS 27 FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, LLC and FFS HOLDING, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) will and 28 hereby do move this Court for an Order in limine to exclude any and all evidence, including but not -1- DEFENDANTS’ MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 6 TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF PLAINTIFF’S LEAVE OF ABSENCE