arrow left
arrow right
  • PULICE-V-SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Print Breach of Contract/Warranty Unlimited  document preview
  • PULICE-V-SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Print Breach of Contract/Warranty Unlimited  document preview
  • PULICE-V-SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Print Breach of Contract/Warranty Unlimited  document preview
  • PULICE-V-SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Print Breach of Contract/Warranty Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

H Theodore L Senet, Esq. (CSB # 082788) Exempt from Filing Fees tsenpt@gibbsgiden.com Government Code § 6103 5 “‘J‘f Chnsto her K. Trembley, Esq. (CSB # 281237) ctremb ey gibbsgidermom GIBBS P G EN LOCHER TURNER SENET & WITTBROD'IsmTY OF SAN BERNngNTG ORigU'fi'Tgp BurpRNIA 1880 Century Park East, 12th Floor BERNARD'NO DW‘C‘ SAN Los Angeles, California 90067-1621 JUN 0 1 202‘ ,ffihtfl‘ Tel: (310) 552—3400 \DOOQONUIAUJN Julianna K. Tiuquist, Esq. (CSB # 180552) SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTIbeIJTéfTE RODRIGUEZ, DEPUT QM .< 1170 West Third Street, 2nd Floor San Bernardino, California 92410 Attorneys for Defendant SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION LLP AUTHORITY SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO WITI'BRODT S; PULICE CONSTRUCTION, INC, an Afizona Case No. CIV DS 2020473 corporation SENET Assigned to the Hon. Wilfied J. Schneider, Plamtlff, 11, Department S32 TURNER V. [Unlimited Jurisdiction] SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, a joint NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION OF DEFENDANT SAN BERNARDINO LOCHER powers authority; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY TO COMPEL NNNNNNNNNu—Ir—Iy—Ir—IHHHr—Ir—ar—d GIDEN mflambWNHONOOOVQUl-bWNfi-‘O Defendants. ARBITRATION AND STAY ACTION PENDING ARBITRATION; GIBBS MEMORANDUM 0F POINTS AND AUTHOgITIES IN SUPPORT THERE F W) Set me . [Filed concurrently with Declarations 0f Jeflery Hill, Jagdish Patel and Theodore L. Senet, Esq.; and Order thereon (proposedfl Date: August 3, 2021 Time: 9:00 a.m. Dept: S32 Complaint Filed: October 6. 2020 /// 1 NOTICE 0F MOTIONAND MOTION T0 COMPEL ARBITRATIONAND STA YACTION 2542855.! TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on August 3, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. or as soon as the matter may be heard in Department S32 of the above—referenced Court, located at 247 West \OOOQmUl-PUJNp—i Third Street, San Bernardino, California 92415, Defendant SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY will and hereby does move for an Order compelling arbitration and staying proceedings until completion of arbitration, in accordance with California law and the written agreements governing this dispute. LLP Relevant portions of the contract between Plaintiff PULICE CONSTRUCTION, INC. WITI‘BRODT (“Pulice”) and Defendant SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (“SBCTA”), and relevant portions of the contract specifications incorporated 8L into the contract by reference, are attached as Exhibit A and Exhibit B, respectively, to the Declaration of Jeffery Hill submitted herewith and incorporated herein by reference. SENET Relevant portions of the subsequently executed Dispute Resolution Board Agreement TURNER between Pulice and SBCTA, which acknowledges and confirms the parties’ agreement to LOCHER submit this dispute to arbitration, is attached as Exhibit A to the Declaration of Jagdish Patel NNNNNNNNNHHHHr—dr—Ir—Ir—lr—Ap—a submitted herewith and incorporated herein by reference. GIDEN This Motion will be made pursuant to California Public Contract Code § 10240 on now pending before this mandatory WNQM$WNHO©WNQMAUJNHO the grounds that the action Court is subj ect to arbitration GIBBS pursuant to California law, and as provided by the arbitration provisions contained in the agreements executed by the parties. California law favors arbitration of disputes on public works of improvements, and Pulice has failed to comply with its contractual requirements to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing this action. This Motion is also made pursuant to California Code 0f Civil Procedure § 1 28 1 .4, on the grounds that when the Court orders the parties to arbitrate this dispute, the Court should stay the current litigation pending completion of arbitration. This Motion is based on this Notice, the Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed herewith, the Declarations of Jeffery Hill and Jagdish Patel and the exhibits attached thereto filed herewith, the 2 NOTICE 0F MOTIONAND MOTION T0 COMPEL ARBITRATIONAND STAYACTION 25428551