Defendant's Reply to Plaintiffs' Response to its Motion for Summary Judgment - Answer/Contest/Response/Waiver Index # 36

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

                        

						    Preview
                        
                        
                                                       CAUSE NO. 20          270672

JARED and NICOLE ROUGEAU,                                   IN THE DISTRICT COURT
    Plaintiffs,

                                                            458    JUDICIAL DISTRICT
                                            §
STATE FARM LLOYDS,
     Defendant                                         FORT BEND COUNTY, TEXAS

    DEFENDANT’S REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO ITS MOTION FOR
                       SUMMARY JUDGMENT


      Defendant State Farm Lloyds files this Reply to Plaintiffs’ Response to State

Farm’s Motion for Summary Judgment because the evidence and argument in Plaintiffs’

response is factually illogical to the point of being irrelevant, frivolous and legally

inadmissible. Specifically, State Farm’s Motion is about why Plaintiff is not entitled to

benefits in connection with a claim submitted     June 25, 2019 for a             loss at

their home in Katy, Texas yet Plaintiff      to create a fact is…