On February 03, 2021 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Alcazar Jr., Juan,
Torres, Jorge Lomeli,
and
Does 1-10,
Nissan North America, Inc. A California Corporation,
for Breach of Contract/Warranty Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
OMGINAL
\OOONQU’IAUJNr—I
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
JUAN ALCAZAR JR., and Case No.: CIVSB2103 192
JORGE LOMELI TORRES,
PROPOSED] ORDER 0N
Plaintiffs, DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPE
ARBITRATION AND STAY ACTION
vs. .<
Hearing Date: January 25, 2023 'I'I
NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., a Hearing Time: 8:25 a.m.
California Corporation, and
through 10, inclusive,
DOES 1 Department: S33 i
Date Filed: February 3, 2021
NNNNNNNNNHt—Ir—dt—Ip—Ib—IHb—th—IH
Defendants. Trial Date: April 24, 2023
mflamthfi-‘OWmflaMAWNF—‘o
[BROBOSED] ORDER
T0 ALL PARTIES AND TIEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
The matter of Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action was heard on
January 25, 2023 at 8:25 a.m., in Department S33 ofthis Court, located at 247 West Third Street,
San Bernardino, CA 9241 5.
\DWQQUI#UJNn—I
Having read the motion, the memoranda and the declarations filed by the parties, and
having head oral argument of counsel, the Court makes its Order, as follows:
1. Plaintiffs’ evidentiary obj ection on grounds of lack ofproper authentication is
SUSTAINED, but the Court notes that the objection is immaterial to the disposition
of the motion;
2. Defendant Nissan North America, Inc.’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay
Proceedings is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED
Dated:
2C1
/&2 2/ 2
éégg
Judge of the Superior Court
Hon. Winston Keh
‘
swswaflaw 7=<
NNNNNNNNNu—IHHHr—Au—AHHHH
OOQQUIAWNHOOOOQO‘sUItht—‘O
-2-
[WEB] ORDER
Document Filed Date
April 18, 2023
Case Filing Date
February 03, 2021
Category
Breach of Contract/Warranty Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
OMGINAL \OOONQU’IAUJNr—I SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO JUAN ALCAZAR JR., and Case No.: CIVSB2103 192 JORGE LOMELI TORRES, PROPOSED] ORDER 0N Plaintiffs, DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPE ARBITRATION AND STAY ACTION vs. .< Hearing Date: January 25, 2023 'I'I NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., a Hearing Time: 8:25 a.m. California Corporation, and through 10, inclusive, DOES 1 Department: S33 i Date Filed: February 3, 2021 NNNNNNNNNHt—Ir—dt—Ip—Ib—IHb—th—IH Defendants. Trial Date: April 24, 2023 mflamthfi-‘OWmflaMAWNF—‘o [BROBOSED] ORDER T0 ALL PARTIES AND TIEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: The matter of Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action was heard on January 25, 2023 at 8:25 a.m., in Department S33 ofthis Court, located at 247 West Third Street, San Bernardino, CA 9241 5. \DWQQUI#UJNn—I Having read the motion, the memoranda and the declarations filed by the parties, and having head oral argument of counsel, the Court makes its Order, as follows: 1. Plaintiffs’ evidentiary obj ection on grounds of lack ofproper authentication is SUSTAINED, but the Court notes that the objection is immaterial to the disposition of the motion; 2. Defendant Nissan North America, Inc.’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED Dated: 2C1 /&2 2/ 2 éégg Judge of the Superior Court Hon. Winston Keh ‘ swswaflaw 7=< NNNNNNNNNu—IHHHr—Au—AHHHH OOQQUIAWNHOOOOQO‘sUItht—‘O -2- [WEB] ORDER