Proof of Service: Montoya -v- Motorola Mobility, LLC et al Print

• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                ELECTRONICALLY FILED
     Adam Kocaj,   Bar No. 321680                                            SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFOI ?NIA
     LAW OFFICES OF SAMER HABBAS & ASSOCMTES, P.C                            COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINC )
                                                                             SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT
     200 Spectrum Center    D12, Ste.   1230
     Irvine, CA 92618                                                        10/1 1/2023 2:34   PM
     Tel:   (949)727-9300
                                                                             By: Brianna Johnson,    DEPUTY
     Fax: (949)727-9308


     Attorneys for Plaintiff,   GARRETT MONTOYA



                       SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
                                    COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

10
     GARRETT MONTOYA,
11                                                        Case No. CIVSB2218615
                    Plaintiff,                            Assigned to: Hon. Donald Alvarez
12                                                        Dept. $23

     VS.
13
                                        PROOF OF SERVICE OF PLAINTIFF’S
     MOTOROLA MOBILITY, LLC; VERIZON OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT
14


15   WIRELESS SERVICES, LLC; AIRTOUCH MOTOROLA MOBILITY, LLC’S
     CELLULAR INC. DBA VERIZON          DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF’S SECOND
16   WIRELESS; ASURION, LLC, ASURION    AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
     INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., AND DOES MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND
17
     1 TO 50,
                                        AUTHORITIES; DECLARATION OF
                                        ADAM KOCAJ, ESQ. IN SUPPORT OF
18
               Defendants.
                                        OPPOSITION; AND [PROPOSED]
                                        ORDER
19


20                                                        [Filed concurrently With Plaintiff s Opposition
                                                          t0Defendant Motorola Mobility, LLC’s
21                                                        Demurrer to Plaintiff” s Second Amended
                                                          Complaint and    Memorandum      0f Points and
22                                                        Authorities; Declaration of Adam Kocaj, Esq.
                                                          in Support   of Opposition; and [Proposed]
23
                                                          Order]
24
                                                          Demurrer Hearing Date:
25                                                        Date: October 24, 2023
                                                          Time: 8:30    AM
26                                                        Dept: 823

27


28


                                                      1




                                               PROOF OF SERVICE
                                                                PROOF OF SERVICE
     I   am employed in the County 0f Orange,                        State   of California.   I   am over the   age of eighteen (18)
     years and not a party t0 the within entitled action.                         My   business address   is   200 Spectrum Center
     Drive, Suite 1230, Irvine,               CA 92618.

     On October         11,    2023   I   served the within          PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION                    TO DEFENDANT
     MOTOROLA MOBILITY, LLC’S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF’S SECOND
     AMENDED COMPLAINT AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES;
     DECLARATION OF ADAM KOCAJ, ESQ. IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION; AND
     [PROPOSED]               ORDER 0n the interested parties in this action, addressed as follows:
                                                                See Attached Service List

     I   am   "readily familiar" with the film's practice of collection and correspondence for mailing, that
     the correspondence              would be deposited with
                                                      the U.S. Postal Service 0n the same day in the

10   ordinary course of business.                   I   am
                                           aware that 0n motion 0f a party served, service is presumed
     invalid ifpostal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after the date deposit
11   for mailing in the affidavit.


12
     If an * is placed before             any name,        it   signifies personal delivery instead of mailing.

13
     If an ** is placed before               any name,       it   signifies facsimile delivery in addition to mailing.

14
     If   an ***
               is placed before any name, it signifies ONLY BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION.

15   Only by e-mailing the document t0 the persons at the e-mail addresses shown 0n the service list.
     Pursuant t0 California Code 0f Civil Procedure §1010.6, this office Will use electronic mail for
16
     service purposes.

17


18   I   declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing                                 is

     true     and   correct.    I   declare that  I am employed              in the   office 0f a   member of the bar of this   court   a1

19   Whose      direction the service          was made.

20


21


22


23


24


25
              M
     Executed 0n October




                Scott   Banks
                                       11,   2023       at Irvine, California.




26


27


28


                                                                              2


                                                                   PROOF OF SERVICE