arrow left
arrow right
  • Patterson Vs Care One At Moorestown Llc *SlcMedical Malpractice document preview
  • Patterson Vs Care One At Moorestown Llc *SlcMedical Malpractice document preview
  • Patterson Vs Care One At Moorestown Llc *SlcMedical Malpractice document preview
  • Patterson Vs Care One At Moorestown Llc *SlcMedical Malpractice document preview
						
                                

Preview

BUR-L-000190-16 09/27/2023 Pg 1 of 2 Trans ID: LCV20232975943 Filed with the Court SEP 27 2023 Eric G. Fikry, J.S.C. EDITED BY THE COURT: SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY JAMIE VALENTINE, ADMINISTRATOR LAW DIVISION - CIVIL PART AND ADMINISTRATOR AD BURLINGTON COUNTY PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF DOCKET NO. L-190-16 JAMES PATTERSON, DECEASED, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, ORDER v. (HYPOTHETICALS) CARE ONE AT MOORESTOWN, LLC d/b/a CARE ONE AT MOORESTOWN, CARE ONE MANAGEMENT, LLC, HEALTHBRIDGE MANAGEMENT, LLC, VIRTUA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, VIRTUA MARLTON HOSPITAL, and VIRTUA HEALTH, INC. Defendants. THIS MATTER having been brought before the Court on a Motion in limine by Defendants, Care One at Moorestown, LLC d/b/a Care One at Moorestown, Care One Management, LLC and Healthbridge Management, LLC, represented by Anthony Cocca, Esq. and Katelyn E. Cutinello, Esq. of Cocca & Cutinello, LLP for an Order barring plaintiff from asking improper hypothetical questions; and with Opposition to the motion by Plaintiff, Jamie Valentine, Administrator and Administrator ad Prosequendum of the Estate of James Patterson, Deceased, represented by Matthew E. Gallagher, Esq. of Swartz Culleton PC; and the Court having considered the submissions of the parties, the oral arguments of counsel, if any, and for good cause shown: IT IS on this 27th day of September, 2023 ORDERED: BUR-L-000190-16 09/27/2023 Pg 2 of 2 Trans ID: LCV20232975943 1. Defendants’ Motion in limine for an Order barring plaintiff from asking improper hypothetical questions is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for the reasons set forth on the record on September 27, 2023. 2. Provisions in Prior Orders Not Modified Herein Remain in Effect. Any provision(s) in prior Orders of the Court not modified herein remain in full force and effect. 3. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be deemed served upon all counsel and parties of record upon its being posted to eCourts. s/ Eric G. Fikry, J.S.C. HON. ERIC G. FIKRY, J.S.C. ☒ Opposed ☐ Unopposed