Preview
BER-L-006134-23 02/06/2024 4:07:51 PM Pg 1 of 2 Trans ID: LCV2024339051
Alexander Schachtel, Esq. (ID # 128062015)
Law Office of Alexander Schachtel, LLC
101 Hudson Street, Ste. 2109
Jersey City, New Jersey 07302
Attorney for Defendants
(p) 201-925-0660
(e) xschachtel@gmail.com
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
CESAR PINA and JENNIFER PINA, LAW DIVISION: BERGEN COUNTY
DOCKET NO.: BER-L-6134-23
Plaintiffs,
NOTICE OF MOTION TO DISMISS
v. COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO R. 4:6-
2(b), FOR LACK OF PERSONAL
ANTHONY ROBINSON, TONY THE JURISDICTION
CLOSER LLC, I CLOSE DEALS LLC,
RONA PROOF LLC, REAL ESTATE RICO
LLC, NICHOLE LYNELL LLC,
Defendants.
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Friday, March 1, 2023, or as soon thereafter as
counsel can be heard, all Defendants named above will appear before the Superior Court of New
Jersey, Bergen County, Law Division to request an order dismissing the Plaintiff’s Complaint
and all counts set forth therein, pursuant to R. 4:6-2(b), for lack of personal jurisdiction.
Please TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that in support of this motion Defendants will rely
on the accompanying certifications, letter brief and the annexed exhibits.
Please TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Defendants request oral argument only if this
motion is opposed.
By: /s/ Alexander Schachtel
Alexander Schachtel, Esq.
Attorney for Defendants
BER-L-006134-23 02/06/2024 4:07:51 PM Pg 2 of 2 Trans ID: LCV2024339051
Dated: February 6, 2024
BER-L-006134-23 02/06/2024 4:07:51 PM Pg 1 of 2 Trans ID: LCV2024339051
Alexander Schachtel, Esq. (ID # 128062015)
Law Office of Alexander Schachtel, LLC
101 Hudson Street, Ste. 2109
Jersey City, New Jersey 07302
Attorney for Defendants
(p) 201-925-0660
(e) xschachtel@gmail.com
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
LAW DIVISION: BERGEN COUNTY
CESAR PINA and JENNIFER PINA, DOCKET NO.: BER-L-6134-23
Plaintiffs,
v. PROPOSED ORDER
ANTHONY ROBINSON, TONY THE
CLOSER LLC, I CLOSE DEALS LLC,
RONA PROOF LLC, REAL ESTATE RICO
LLC, NICHOLE LYNELL LLC,
Defendants.
THIS MATTER having been brought before the Court by Alexander Schachtel, Esq.
attorney for Defendants, seeking relief by way of Order dismissing the Complaint, pursuant to R.
4:6-2(b), for lack of personal jurisdiction, and the court having considered the submissions of the
movant, opposition of the Plaintiffs, and having heard argument on the matter;
IT IS on this ___________ day of _______________________, 24,
ORDERED that the Complaint is hereby dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to R. 4:6-
2(b), as this Court lacks personal jurisdiction over all Defendants named in the Complaint; and it
is further
ORDERED that a copy of this order shall be served upon counsel for the opposing party
within ___________ days.
BER-L-006134-23 02/06/2024 4:07:51 PM Pg 2 of 2 Trans ID: LCV2024339051
_________________ OPPOSED
_________________ UNOPPOSED
By order of ______________________________________
J.S.C.
BER-L-006134-23 02/06/2024 4:07:51 PM Pg 1 of 5 Trans ID: LCV2024339051
Alexander Schachtel, Esq. (ID # 128062015)
Law Office of Alexander Schachtel, LLC
101 Hudson Street, Ste. 2109
Jersey City, New Jersey 07302
Attorney for Defendants
(p) 201-925-0660
(e) xschachtel@gmail.com
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
CESAR PINA and JENNIFER PINA, LAW DIVISION: BERGEN COUNTY
DOCKET NO.: BER-L-6134-23
Plaintiffs,
CERTIFICATION OF ANTHONY
v. ROBINSON IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
TO DISMISS
ANTHONY ROBINSON, TONY THE
CLOSER LLC, I CLOSE DEALS LLC,
RONA PROOF LLC, REAL ESTATE RICO
LLC, NICHOLE LYNELL LLC,
Defendants.
I, Anthony Robinson, being of due age and of sound mind, do hereby say and affirm as
follows:
1. I am named as a Defendant in this lawsuit and therefore I am personally familiar with the
facts which are set forth in this statement.
2. I am also the owner of all LLCs which are named as co-Defendants in this lawsuit.
3. I am currently a resident of Los Angeles, California, and a citizen of the State of
California. I have never been a resident of New Jersey.
4. The business entities named as Defendants in this case are companies that I formed and
registered in the State of North Carolina.
5. I have not intentionally published or broadcast any messages into the State of New
BER-L-006134-23 02/06/2024 4:07:51 PM Pg 2 of 5 Trans ID: LCV2024339051
Jersey, ever.
6. None of my businesses has ever done anything to target Cesar or Jen Pina or the State of
New Jersey.
7. None of my businesses have ever operated in the State of New Jersey.
8. All social media posts that are referenced in the Complaint were made by me personally,
on my personal social media pages.
9. My social media posts did not involve any of the business entity Defendants.
10. I am former professional athlete.
11. After retiring from sports I developed a second career as a realtor.
12. As part of my real estate career, I have used social media frequently under my “screen
name” “Tony the Closer.”
13. Part of my social media use involves the area of “citizen journalism” as I have helped to
expose scams in the real estate industry.
14. I had previously, in 2022 and early 2023, helped to identify Gregory Parker (a/k/a) “Biz
Bizzness” as the operator of a real estate scam.
15. Big Bizzness was a high-profile social media influencer who was operating a
multimillion dollar real estate scam in the Philadelphia area.
16. In the Spring of 2023, after outing Big Bizzness, I earned a reputation on social
media for busting scammers, and I started to receive messages from victims of an investment
scam involving Cesar Pina.
17. By June of 2023, I had heard from over ten separate victims of this scam.
18. The victims that reached out to me were located in New York, New Jersey,
Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Florida, and other parts of the country.
BER-L-006134-23 02/06/2024 4:07:51 PM Pg 3 of 5 Trans ID: LCV2024339051
19. Most of the victims had a similar story, they said they had signed joint venture
investment contracts for house flipping deals, made large deposits of a hundred thousand dollars
or more to Cesar Pina, Jennifer Pina, or their associates, and were promised payouts within six
months when subject properties were supposed to be sold.
20. Unfortunately, the victims had been ripped off and almost none of them had gotten any
money back. The promised payouts never came through.
21. Most victims that I spoke to had learned of the Pinas by attending real estate seminars
hosted by DJ Envy, or through DJ Envy’s radio show or social media posts.
22. DJ Envy is a well-known DJ who hosts “The Breakfast Club,” a morning talk
radio show broadcast nationally through iHeartRadio.
23. DJ Envy is Cesar Pina’s business partner, and he had a large role in the Pinas’ scam.
24. From May 2023 through August of 2023, I received hundreds of emails, direct
messages, phone calls, and other outreach from more victims of this scam.
25. As of the date of this statement, I have personally spoken to close to one hundred victims
of the Pinas’ scam, and I would estimate that the total amount of money that the Pinas stole from
these people is in the range of $40 Million to $70 Million.
26. I have personally hosted interviews with some of the victims by doing live broadcasts on
my Instagram or Twitter feeds.
27. I have also done interviews with former associates of the Pinas, who chose to speak out
and help bring attention to the Pinas criminal behavior.
28. My motivation for giving a platform to victims was not to make money or build fame for
myself, but to try to help the people who lost money seek justice for what the Pinas had done to
them, mostly by getting their money back.
BER-L-006134-23 02/06/2024 4:07:51 PM Pg 4 of 5 Trans ID: LCV2024339051
29. I have also been interviewed by law enforcement officers and private attorneys in
relation to ongoing criminal and civil legal proceedings against the Pinas.
30. In October 2023 the US Attorney for the District of New Jersey filed a criminal
complaint against Cesar Pina, the Plaintiff in this lawsuit, for wire fraud.
31. The US Attorney’s Office called the Pinas’ scam a “Ponzi-like scheme”
and described the same scheme that had been described to me by the victims I interviewed on
social media.
32. To my knowledge, the Pinas are currently facing at least twenty (20) separate civil
lawsuits from their scam victims.
33. Personally, I have made no money by exposing this scam.
34. I have not charged any money for interviews, media appearances, or received payments
from any third parties for my work on social media exposing the Pinas.
35. In fact, I am losing money because I am now being forced to pay legal fees to defend
this frivolous lawsuit.
36. I had been trying to raise funds to help pay for my legal fees by selling t-shirts, which I
have advertised online in some of my social media posts.
37. I have called the Pinas and their associates “Real Estate RICO” operators, because
truthfully, that is what they were doing.
38. The Pinas have stolen tens of millions of dollars from victims in New Jersey who are
mostly black and Hispanic young men.
39. I have tried to stand up for members of my community by giving voices to the victims of
the scam.
40. This lawsuit that has been filed against me is outrageous and absurd, it is like
BER-L-006134-23 02/06/2024 4:07:51 PM Pg 5 of 5 Trans ID: LCV2024339051
Bernie Madoff suing the people who exposed his Ponzi scheme for defamation.
41. Cesar Pina is an abject criminal, con man, and scammer of epic proportions and he
should be in jail.
42. All of my posts about the Pinas contained information that was shared with me by direct
victims of their scam, or by attorneys, journalists, investigators, or other social media researchers
in which case the information was backed up by public record documents.
43. Some of my social media posts about the Pinas were intended for humor and were not
meant to be taken seriously, it was obvious which posts were humorous based on the content.
44. Upon the advice of my attorney, the court does not need to look at the merits of the
claims against me in the complaint because this case should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
45. I have never done or said anything to target the Plaintiffs in the State of New Jersey.
46. No social media post was made about the Pinas by any of the businesses that are named
as Defendants in this lawsuit.
47. Upon the advice of my attorney, I respectfully request that the Court dismiss the lawsuit
against me for these reasons.
48. I certify that I placed my electronic signature below on this statement in place of my
original signature.
49. I hereby certify that the foregoing statements made by me are true, I am aware that if
any of these statements are willfully false, I am subject to punishment.
/s/ Anthony Robinson
Anthony Robinson
Dated: 2/5/2024
BER-L-006134-23 02/06/2024 4:07:51 PM Pg 1 of 1 Trans ID: LCV2024339051
CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
I, Alexander Schachtel, Esq., hereby certify that the original of the within notice of
motion and supporting papers have been filed with the Court via e-file, and that a true and
accurate copy of same has been served to opposing counsel via regular U.S. mail and via-email
to the following addresses:
Corinne Mullen Esq.
Mullen Law Firm
221 River Street, 9th Floor
Hoboken, New Jersey 07030
Law Office of Alexander Schachtel
Attorney for Defendant
/s/ Alexander Schachtel
Dated: February 6, 2024
BER-L-006134-23 02/06/2024 4:07:51 PM Pg 1 of 2 Trans ID: LCV2024339051
Alexander Schachtel, Esq. (ID # 128062015)
Law Office of Alexander Schachtel, LLC
101 Hudson Street, Ste. 2109
Jersey City, New Jersey 07302
Attorney for Defendants
(p) 201-925-0660
(e) xschachtel@gmail.com
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
CESAR PINA and JENNIFER PINA, LAW DIVISION: BERGEN COUNTY
DOCKET NO.: BER-L-6134-23
Plaintiffs,
CERTIFICATION OF COUNSEL IN
v. SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
ANTHONY ROBINSON, TONY THE
CLOSER LLC, I CLOSE DEALS LLC,
RONA PROOF LLC, REAL ESTATE RICO
LLC, NICHOLE LYNELL LLC,
Defendants.
I, Alexander Schachtel Esq., being of due age and of sound mind, do hereby say and
affirm as follows:
1. I am counsel to the Defendants in this action and therefore I am personally familiar with
the contents of this statement and related subject matter.
2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a copy of the Plaintiffs’ filed complaint.
3. Attached hereto as Exhibit B are copies of various local and national media reports which
relate to the Plaintiffs’ operation of a multimillion dollar “Ponzi scheme.”
4. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a copy of a criminal complaint against Cesar Pina filed
by the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey.
5. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a copy of a press release from the United States
BER-L-006134-23 02/06/2024 4:07:51 PM Pg 2 of 2 Trans ID: LCV2024339051
Attorneys’ Office, dated October 18, 2023, corresponding to the filing of the criminal complaint
against Planitiff Cesar Pina.
6. I hereby certify that the foregoing statements made by me are true, I am aware that if
any of these statements are willfully false, I am subject to punishment.
/s/ Alexander Schachtel
Alexander Schachtel Esq.
Dated: 2/6/2024
BER-L-006134-23 02/06/2024 4:07:51 PM Pg 1 of 28 Trans ID: LCV2024339051
EXHIBIT A
BER-L-006134-23
BER-L-006134-23 11/13/2023
02/06/20243:59:20
4:07:51PM
PM Pg
Pg12of
of24
28 Trans
TransID:
ID:LCV20233353851
LCV2024339051
MULLEN LAW FIRM
Corinne M. M Mullen, Esq. (Attorney ID# 035551983)
Hoboken Riverfront Center
221 River Street, 9th Floor
Hoboken, NJ 07030
Phone: (201) 420-1911
Fax: (201) 742-7022
Email: corinne@mullenlawfirm.com
Attorney for Plaintiffs, Cesar Pina and Jennifer Pina
CESAR PINA and JENNIFER PINA SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW
JERSEY
Plaintiffs,
LAW DIVISION: BERGEN
vs. COUNTY
ANTHONY ROBINSON, TONY THE CLOSER DOCKET NO.:
LLC, I CLOSE DEALS LLC, RONA PROOF LLC,
REAL ESTATE RICO, LLC, NICHOLE LYNELL, CIVIL ACTION
LLC.
Defendants. VERIFIED COMPLAINT
Plaintiffs, Cesar Pina (“Mr. Pina”) and Jennifer Pina (“Mrs. Pina”) (collectively “the
Pinas” or “Plaintiffs”), by and through their undersigned counsel, Mullen Law Firm, alleges the
following against Anthony Robinson a/k/a Tony the Closer (“Defendant”), Tony the Closer LLC,
I Close Deals LLC, Rona Proof LLC, Real Estate Rico, LLC, and Nichole Lynell, LLC.
(“Defendants”).
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
1. In this action, Defendants, knowingly and intentionally, individually and collectively,
have uttered false, slanderous and defamatory statements about the Plaintiffs, which have
and continue to severely damage Plaintiffs. Defendants have engaged in this wrongful
conduct for the purpose of defaming plaintiffs, interfering with Plaintiffs’ prospective
economic advantage and interfering with the contracts entered by Plaintiffs.
BER-L-006134-23
BER-L-006134-23 11/13/2023
02/06/20243:59:20
4:07:51PM
PM Pg
Pg23of
of24
28 Trans
TransID:
ID:LCV20233353851
LCV2024339051
2. As a result of the tortious conduct engaged in by defendants, collectively and
individually, Plaintiffs have suffered loss of reputation, compensatory and punitive
damages in an amount to be determined at trial.
3. Furthermore, as a result of the conduct engaged in by Defendants, the Defendants
individually and collectively have been generating sales of their own products, increasing
traffic on various social media sites operated by Defendant Anthony Robinson and his
associates, and for the personal gain of Anthony Robinson and his associates and
Limited Liability Companies under his control, and limited liability companies under the
control of his partner, Nichole Lynel, operating as Nichole Lynel, LLC. Defendants have
also benefited from their false and defamatory statements against Plaintiffs in the form of
paid advertisements.
4. As such, Plaintiffs bring this suit, inter alia, to enjoin Defendants from making any
further false defamatory or slanderous statements about Plaintiffs, and for damages
against Defendants to recover the losses that Plaintiff has sustained, resulting from
Defendant’s wrongful actions.
NATURE OF THE ACTION
5. This case arises from the Defendant’s false, defamatory, slanderous, and malicious
assertions that Plaintiffs are “thieves” and “scammers” and that they “stole millions”.
6. Defendant has publicly and maliciously spread these false claims on his websites
(https://tonythecloser.com/ and https://www.iclosedealstoo.com/), and through his sizable
social media presence, including accounts on Instagram
(https://www.instagram.com/tonythecloser), Twitter (@tonythecloser_), and YouTube
(https://www.youtube.com/@TonyTheCloser).
BER-L-006134-23
BER-L-006134-23 11/13/2023
02/06/20243:59:20
4:07:51PM
PM Pg
Pg34of
of24
28 Trans
TransID:
ID:LCV20233353851
LCV2024339051
7. As part of a tortious strategy to drive views and engagement with his own brand,
Defendant Robinson frequently makes posts insulting, attacking, or arguing with other
public figures.
8. Defendant Robinson uses his social media presence to promote his own uses his websites
and social media platforms to sell self-promotional real estate “coaching” materials under
various names and through several different companies, including his “Rona Proof
Master Class” course materials; weight-loss drinks, clothing and other items on his social
media platform as well as his associate’s platform, Defendant Nichole Lynett, LLC.
9. Defendant also promotes his real estate investing business and his real estate coaching
business through his social media accounts,
10. Beginning on or about May 25, 2023, Defendant began posting about what he deemed a
“scam” run by the Pinas and Raashauna Casey (“Mr. Casey”), initially asserting in an
Instagram “live” post (a live video broadcast to all of Defendant’s Instagram followers)
that the Pinas had been accused of scamming investors, and that the Pinas were only
famous because they had been “promoted” on Mr. Casey’s radio show.
11. During his first May 25, 2023, “live” post regarding Mr. Casey, Defendant was careful to
state that these were “allegations,” and “claims,” by investors who claimed to be
defrauded by the Pinas, and not factual statements.
12. Throughout June 2023, Defendant continued to refine his new business model and
increased social media success as an enemy of “scammers,” posting attacks against
alleged “scammers,” and then quickly advertising his real estate courses.
BER-L-006134-23
BER-L-006134-23 11/13/2023
02/06/20243:59:20
4:07:51PM
PM Pg
Pg45of
of24
28 Trans
TransID:
ID:LCV20233353851
LCV2024339051
13. On July 19, 2023, and then again on September 21, 2023 Defendant posted on Instagram
“Tony The Closer Top Ten List of Scammers 2023 drops [] today #RealEstateRico
#NoRefundsNoPeace HowtoCatchaScammer.” appearing below:
14.
15. This image falsely accuses Plaintiffs of being scammers and is defamatory as it claims
that Plaintiffs’ are not legitimate and that they steal money from investors.
16. On June 29, 2023, Defendant posted an updated list of “Tony The Closer Top 10
Scammer List,” on Twitter and Instagram, generating thousands of likes, more than 1,300
comments, and hundreds of thousands of “views” across both platforms.
17. These false statements regarding Plaintiffs continue to generate substantial publicity for
Defendant and his companies through the sale of his real estate “guru” investment
courses and other services to “first time” buyers who want to earn “$20k” per month.
18. On August 11, 2023, Defendant stated, “I'm gonna say so Goddamnit heavy you
say right beside flipping in Cesar running the whole full blown Ponzi scheme you
got lygus come into my career talking about you're running a criminal organization
there's drugs involved in everything and I need to shut up [] Did you just go get the
you got the blog's involved after you had come to my career with drugs and all
kinds of shit, you know how they shouldn't make you to tell me to shut up you can't
BER-L-006134-23
BER-L-006134-23 11/13/2023
02/06/20243:59:20
4:07:51PM
PM Pg
Pg56of
of24
28 Trans
TransID:
ID:LCV20233353851
LCV2024339051
be a smart liquid because now he just gave all the eyeballs on me Hey over so I'm
happy to be here because this is one of the full drug organization.”
19. On August 11, 2023, Defendant stated, “Because he's used his platform to talk
about pushing education to the people and people who are out here right now
suffering because his business partner, stole millions of dollars, and we're not
talking about one or $2 million, there's only 50 victims are ready to have come
forward and over $25 million.”
20. During a live video conference hosted on August 15, 2023, Defendant stated the
following:
a. “from the words that I’ve already had speaking to attorneys, as well over 25
million already that happen that he has spoken to and in victims, and this could be
potentially a 50 to $100 million Ponzi scheme once it’s all said and done.”
b. “ And here's the thing I want to talk about I Heart Radio is very, very much liable
for it. I'm using it for allowing DJ envy to use and promote a known felon who
was a drug trafficker, a scammer from the 90s He allowed that same dude to come
out there and do the same exact crime to millions of people. He promoted a flat
out fraud a scammer and a drug dealer on the platform. And guess what they did?
They scammed as they drove they sold drugs. They're involved with drug dealers.
They were involved in a very nasty I'm telling you, I don't give a fuck these
motherfuckers were involved in drugs. They were involved in money laundering.
If you look at some of the actual some of the actual videos even looking at
Lutchy's page, they're saying they're collecting rent. You're gonna look at the
money and the way that the money is wrapped and rubber bands this shit doesn't
BER-L-006134-23
BER-L-006134-23 11/13/2023
02/06/20243:59:20
4:07:51PM
PM Pg
Pg67of
of24
28 Trans
TransID:
ID:LCV20233353851
LCV2024339051
nobody turns into rent money this way. Nobody nobody turns in rent money and
fucking 20s strapped around in the fucking and rubber bands and stacks like that
only people that put their money like that is dope boys and to sit back and watch
and see.”
c. “If you see these messages where he was literally coercing people, to give them
200…300…400,000 in order to run his fucking Ponzi scheme, yet, none of that
money was used in real estate transactions.”
21. On September 11, 2023, Defendant falsely asserts that Plaintiffs were involved in a slip
and fall lawsuit, appearing below, and claims that Plaintiffs were awarded $425,000,
further alleging that Plaintiffs the lawsuit was an, “insurance finesse”:
22.
BER-L-006134-23
BER-L-006134-23 11/13/2023
02/06/20243:59:20
4:07:51PM
PM Pg
Pg78of
of24
28 Trans
TransID:
ID:LCV20233353851
LCV2024339051
23. This post falsely asserts that Plaintiffs’ are liars and pushes Defendant’s defamatory
statement that Plaintiffs are scammers, criminals, and dishonest.
24. On September 24, 2023, Defendant continues to assert that Plaintiff Cesar Pina has
“finessed” investors, appearing below:
25.
26. This image improperly advances the narrative that Plaintiff Cesar Pina is a greedy
scammer who takes advantage of innocent individuals.
27. As recently as August 2, 2023, Defendant falsely asserted on Twitter that “Raashaun
Casey & Cesar Pina Real Estate Ponzi Scheme Leaves Investor in Financial Ruins After
350k Investment.”
BER-L-006134-23
BER-L-006134-23 11/13/2023
02/06/20243:59:20
4:07:51PM
PM Pg
Pg89of
of24
28 Trans
TransID:
ID:LCV20233353851
LCV2024339051
28. On August 18, 2023, Defendant posted on Instagram, “DJ Envy can you explain if Cesar
ever wrote you a $527,000 bad check or does he only do that to investors?” appearing
below:
29.
30. On September 30, 2023, Defendant posted, “Bruh we got Cesar Bank records from
Flip2Dao and boy has -$6 left! Some of the transactions were Popeyes Chicken, Door
Dash, Gucci, and more #RealEstateRico” appearing below:
31.
BER-L-006134-23 02/06/2024
11/13/2023 4:07:51
3:59:20 PM Pg 10
9 ofof24
28 Trans
TransID:
ID:LCV20233353851
LCV2024339051
32. This post is an invasion of privacy and improperly asserts that Plaintiff Cesar Pina is
scamming investors and using their money for personal use.
33. Defendant hosted a live meeting on or around October 4, 2023 with the title, “Cesar Pina
& DJ Envy Real Estate Fraud Scheme Victims” appearing below:
34.
35. On October 9, 2023, Defendant posted on Instagram, “Husband and wife power couple
scams over 80 million and count! Lives ruined all over while they block and avoid
investors.” appearing below:
BER-L-006134-23
BER-L-006134-23 11/13/2023
02/06/20243:59:20
4:07:51PM
PM Pg
Pg10
11of
of24
28 Trans
TransID:
ID:LCV20233353851
LCV2024339051
36.
37. On October 14, 2023, Defendant posted, “Cesar owes over $900,000 to a man who
passed away. When the family went to claim his money what y’all thing Cesar said” and
then reposted the statement on Instagram on the same day, stating, “No one should be ok
with this violating good people for personal benefit is disgusting.” appearing below:
BER-L-006134-23
BER-L-006134-23 11/13/2023
02/06/20243:59:20
4:07:51PM
PM Pg
Pg11
12of
of24
28 Trans
TransID:
ID:LCV20233353851
LCV2024339051
38.
39. This post improperly depicts Plaintiff Cesar Pina as a cold hearted individual who steals
money from his investors.
40. On an indeterminable date, Defendant posted on his Instagram story reel picture of cash
and the caption, “DJ Ponzi & Flipping pancakes I just want y’all to know that these
people want they damn money back…Money laundering DJ Envy” appearing below:
BER-L-006134-23
BER-L-006134-23 11/13/2023
02/06/20243:59:20
4:07:51PM
PM Pg
Pg12
13of
of24
28 Trans
TransID:
ID:LCV20233353851
LCV2024339051
41.
BER-L-006134-23
BER-L-006134-23 11/13/2023
02/06/20243:59:20
4:07:51PM
PM Pg
Pg13
14of
of24
28 Trans
TransID:
ID:LCV20233353851
LCV2024339051
42. This image improperly asserts that Plaintiffs have been laundering money with the help
of DJ Envy.
43. Defendant accuses Plaintiff Cesar Pina of using his daughter, Taylor Pina, to hide assets
from investors and calls Cesar, “Americas(sic) dumbest criminal[]” appearing below:
44.
45. This post improperly asserts that Plaintiffs are using their daughter to hide assets from
investors, calling them criminals.
46. Defendant posted a comment stating that “hundreds of people who trusted Cesar with
millions of dollars…I began to uncover a web of lies deceit and fraud…people who
BER-L-006134-23
BER-L-006134-23 11/13/2023
02/06/20243:59:20
4:07:51PM
PM Pg
Pg14
15of
of24
28 Trans
TransID:
ID:LCV20233353851
LCV2024339051
wanted to build generational wealth through real estate and got scammed just like I did
years ago by Jay Morrison…This scandal has well over 40 million dollars and lives have
been ruined by this scam.” appearing below:
47.
48. This post improperly pushes the narrative that Plaintiff Cesar Pina is a scammer who
takes advantage of the Black and Hispanic community.
49. Defendant asserts that Cesar has also scammed Snoop Dog, appearing below:
BER-L-006134-23
BER-L-006134-23 11/13/2023
02/06/20243:59:20
4:07:51PM
PM Pg
Pg15
16of
of24
28 Trans
TransID:
ID:LCV20233353851
LCV2024339051
50.
51. Defendant continues to advance the false narrative that Plaintiff Cesar Pina is a scammer
by asserting that Plaintiff Cesar Pina has also scammed Snoop Dog.
52. It is clear that Defendant will continue to make knowingly false, malicious, and
defamatory statements about Plaintiffs across his social media channels, because those
statements generate publicity, increase his social media following, and further his
financial interests by allowing him to increase engagement with new customers and make
money selling real estate “courses” to new viewers.
BER-L-006134-23
BER-L-006134-23 11/13/2023
02/06/20243:59:20
4:07:51PM
PM Pg
Pg16
17of
of24
28 Trans
TransID:
ID:LCV20233353851
LCV2024339051
53. In May 2023, Plaintiff Mr. Pina, was rejected on a business loan for 500k because of
what they saw on social media.
54. In June 2023, Plaintiff Mr. Pina’s 2.5 million dollar refinance was rejected because the
lenders saw Tony the Closer’s social media posts.
55. In June 2023, Plaintiff Mr. Pina’s million dollar refinance chicago was denied because
they saw social media.
56. In July 2023, Plaintiff Mr. Pina’s six properties that were going to be sold were canceled
because of what they saw on social media.
57. In August 2023, Plaintiff Mr. Pina’s ride along event in St. Louis had to be canceled
because of death threats; an estimated 2,000 tickets are sold per event.
58. Plaintiff Mr. Pina’s Real estate platform, “flip2Dao” has been destroyed, first years
earnings was 900k, projected 5 million dollars over next 5 years.
59. Plaintiff Mr. Pina’s TV Show with AE has been placed on hold, endorsement deals alone
are an estimated 500k.
60. Hubzu, the second biggest auction house in the US, canceled their partnership with
Plaintiff Mr. Pina and DJ envy, estimated income 1 million dollars.
61. All of Plaintiff Mr. Pina’s real estate partnerships with lenders, realtors, private lenders,
insurance companies have been canceled, estimated income 300k.
62. Plaintiff Mr. Pina’s One on One income, estimated worth of 360k a year, has been
canceled due to death threats, fear of safety, and overall bookings have decreased.
63. Plaintiff Mr. Pina is unable to lend because of the posts and information after Googled.
64. Plaintiff Mrs. Pina faces possible suspension or loss of her Real Estate license.
65. Plaintiff Mrs. Pina is unable to list or show homes due to death threats via text messages.
BER-L-006134-23
BER-L-006134-23 11/13/2023
02/06/20243:59:20
4:07:51PM
PM Pg
Pg17
18of
of24
28 Trans
TransID:
ID:LCV20233353851
LCV2024339051
66. Plaintiff Mrs. Pina is unable to engage in speaking engagements.
67. Plaintiff Mr.s Pina is unable to conduct agent referrals and co listings.
68. Plaintiff Mrs. Pina’s Braids shop business has been negatively affected by Defendant’s
actions.
JURISDICTION
69. Plaintiffs are residents of Franklin Lakes, Bergen County, New Jersey.
70. Defendants do business individually and collectively in the State of New Jersey.
71. Each and every defamatory statement sued on was of and concerning plaintiffs, New
Jersey residents. Accordingly, the torts and other causes of action alleged herein had
their effect in the State of New Jersey.
VENUE
72. Venue is properly laid in this Court pursuant to Plaintiffs’ residence in Bergen County,
New Jersey.
PARTIES
73. Plaintiff Cesar Pina is a New Jersey resident residing in the Borough of Franklin Lakes,
County of Bergen, and State of New Jersey.
74. Plaintiff Jennifer Pina is a New Jersey resident residing in the Borough of Franklin
Lakes, County of Bergen, and State of New Jersey.
75. Defendant, Anthony Robinson, is, upon information and belief, a California resident with
an address of 1330 South Sante Fe Avenue, Unit 201, 90021. By virtue of his committing
tortious acts in the State of New Jersey, he is subject to the jurisdiction of the State of
New Jersey.
BER-L-006134-23
BER-L-006134-23 11/13/2023
02/06/20243:59:20
4:07:51PM
PM Pg
Pg18
19of
of24
28 Trans
TransID:
ID:LCV20233353851
LCV2024339051
76. Defendants, Tony the Closer LLC, is, upon information and belief, a North Carolina
business with a principal place of business located at 13200 Strickland Road, Raleigh,
North Carolina. By virtue of doing business in the State of New Jersey and committing
tortious acts in the State of New Jersey, Tony the Closer LLC is subject to the jurisdiction
of the State of New Jersey.
77. Defendant I Close Deals LLC is, upon information and belief, a North Carolina business
with a principal place of business located at 13200 Strickland Road, Raleigh, North
Carolina. By virtue of doing business in the State of New Jersey and committing tortious
acts in the State of New Jersey, Defendant I Close Deals, LLC, is subject to the
jurisdiction of the State of New Jersey.
78. Defendant Rona Proof LLC is, upon information and belief, a North Carolina business
with a principal place of business located at 13200 Strickland Road, Raleigh, North
Carolina. By virtue of doing business in the State of New Jersey and committing tortious
acts in the State of New Jersey, Defendant Rona Proof LLC is subject to the jurisdiction
of the State of New Jersey.
79. Defendant Real Estate Rico, LLC is, upon information and belief, a North Carolina
business with a principal place of business located at 13200 Strickland Road, Raleigh,
North Carolina. By virtue of doing business in the State of New Jersey and committing
tortious acts in the State of New Jersey, Defendant Real Estate Rico LLC is subject to the
jurisdiction of the State of New Jersey.
80. Defendant Nichole Lynel, LLC is, upon information and belief, a North Carolina business
with a principal place of business located at 13200 Strickland Road, Raleigh, North
Carolina. By virtue of doing business in the State of New Jersey and committing tortious
BER-L-006134-23
BER-L-006134-23 11/13/2023
02/06/20243:59:20
4:07:51PM
PM Pg
Pg19
20of
of24
28 Trans
TransID:
ID:LCV20233353851
LCV2024339051
acts in the State of New Jersey, Defendant Rona Proof LLC is subject to the jurisdiction
of the State of New Jersey.
COUNT I
Defamation and Slander
Plaintiffs incorporate by reference all forgoing paragraphs of this Complaint, as if fully set forth
therein.
81. Defendant Tony Robinson falsely asserts that Plaintiffs scammed investors through an
investment scheme.
82. Defendant Tony Robinson falsely asserts that Plaintiff Cesar owes, “over $900,000 to a
man who passed away.”
83. Defendant Tony Robinson falsely asserts that Plaintiff Cesar writes bad checks to
investors.
84. There is no basis in fact for Defendant’s endless stream of malicious false statements
outlined above.
85. There was never any basis in fact for any of these accusations or inferences.
86. The statements made by Defendant Robinson concerning Plaintiffs were malicious,
reckless, and/or negligently made, and had the purpose and effect of damaging and
injuring each individual Plaintiff’s good name and reputation in the eyes of the public,
and Plaintiffs’ business interests and partners.
87. The statements made by Defendant Robinson were broadcast to thousands of third parties
by Defendant using his social media platforms, including without limitation Defendant’s
accounts and/or handles on YouTube, Instagram, and Twitter.
BER-L-006134-23
BER-L-006134-23 11/13/2023
02/06/20243:59:20
4:07:51PM
PM Pg
Pg20
21of
of24
28 Trans
TransID:
ID:LCV20233353851
LCV2024339051
88. The statements made by Defendant Robinson concerning Plaintiffs were defamatory and
slanderous per se.
89. Prior to these communications by Defendant Robinson, Plaintiffs had maintained and
enjoyed a distinguished and unblemished reputation for honesty and integrity with the
public and with their business interests and partners.
90. Plaintiffs’ reputation has been irreparably harmed by the defamatory statements made by
Defendant and by the wrongful and illegal actions falsely attributed to Plaintiffs by
Defendant Robinson.
91. Plaintiffs have suffered damages and are entitled to recover compensatory damages in the
amount of $10,000,000.00 and punitive damages in an amount to be determined by the
Court from Defendant Robinson as a result of the malicious and reckless false statements
and accusations Defendant made against them.
92. Based on the forgoing, Plaintiffs are substantially likely to prevail on the merits in this
action.
93. Plaintiffs will be substantially and irreparably harmed without injunctive relief to address
the defamation by Defendant.
94. The equities strongly favor Plaintiffs, and any harm to Defendant will be greater if the
restraints were denied than Defendant would suffer if the restraints were granted.
COUNT II
Claim for Tortious Interference with Prospective Business Relationships
95. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference all forgoing paragraphs of this Complaint, as if fully
set forth therein.
BER-L-006134-23
BER-L-006134-23 11/13/2023
02/06/20243:59:20
4:07:51PM
PM Pg
Pg21
22of
of24
28 Trans
TransID:
ID:LCV20233353851
LCV2024339051
96. Plaintiffs Cesar Pina and Jennifer Pina had existing ventures with numerous businesses
including real estate partnerships, a TV show, a ride along event, and other real estate
related business transactions based upon Plaintiffs’ reputation for honesty and integrity
with the public and with their business partners.
97. Defendants’ false and defamatory statements concerning Plaintiffs have damaged their
reputation for honesty and integrity with the public and with his business partners.
98. This has harmed Plaintiffs’ economic and/or contractual relationships with their existing
business partners by reducing the value of their endorsements as a direct and proximate
result of Defendant’s malicious and/or reckless harm to Plaintiffs’ reputation and public
image.
99. Plaintiffs are entitled to recover compensatory damages in the amount of $10,000,000.00
and punitive damages in an amount to be determined by the Court from Defendants as a
result of Defendant’s interference with their business relationships.
COUNT III
Claim for Tortious Interference with Business Relationships
100. Plaintiffs incorporate b