arrow left
arrow right
  • Salas Rosario Vs Barr-Kramer DianeAuto Negligence-Personal Injury (Verbal Threshold) document preview
  • Salas Rosario Vs Barr-Kramer DianeAuto Negligence-Personal Injury (Verbal Threshold) document preview
  • Salas Rosario Vs Barr-Kramer DianeAuto Negligence-Personal Injury (Verbal Threshold) document preview
  • Salas Rosario Vs Barr-Kramer DianeAuto Negligence-Personal Injury (Verbal Threshold) document preview
  • Salas Rosario Vs Barr-Kramer DianeAuto Negligence-Personal Injury (Verbal Threshold) document preview
  • Salas Rosario Vs Barr-Kramer DianeAuto Negligence-Personal Injury (Verbal Threshold) document preview
  • Salas Rosario Vs Barr-Kramer DianeAuto Negligence-Personal Injury (Verbal Threshold) document preview
  • Salas Rosario Vs Barr-Kramer DianeAuto Negligence-Personal Injury (Verbal Threshold) document preview
						
                                

Preview

ESX-L-001615-24 03/06/2024 11:36:17 AM Pg 1 of 3 Trans ID: LCV2024590259 Jenna K. Clemente, Esq. NJ Attorney ID 275792018 HARDIN, KUNDLA, MCKEON & POLETTO COUNSELLORS AT LAW A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 673 MORRIS AVENUE SPRINGFIELD, NEW JERSEY 07081 (973) 912-5222 Attorneys for Defendant, Diane C. Barr-Kramer DIANE KRAMER, : SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY Plaintiff, : LAW DIVISION: ESSEX COUNTY Docket No. ESX-L-458-23 vs. : Civil Action WORLD SUBARU, LLC, 688 : SHREWSBURY, LLC, CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY, ROSARIO SALAS, : NOTICE OF MOTION TO EXTEND ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY PROPERTY DISCOVERY AND CASUALTY INSURNACE COMPANY, : Defendants. : : SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY ROSARIO SALAS, LAW DIVISION: ESSEX COUNTY : Docket No. ESX-L-1615-24 Plaintiff, vs. : Civil Action DIANE C. BARR-KRAMER, : Defendants. : ESX-L-001615-24 03/06/2024 11:36:17 AM Pg 2 of 3 Trans ID: LCV2024590259 TO: Anneris V. Hernandez, Esq. FREDSON STATMORE BITTERMAN, LLC 200 Broadacres Drive, Suite 180 Bloomfield, New Jersey 07003 Attorney for Plaintiff, Diane Kramer Sander Budanitsk, Esq. SANDER BUDANITSKY LLC 520 W 1st Ave Roselle, New Jersey 07203 Attorney for Plaintiff, Rosario Salas David Cramer, Esq. WALSH PIZZI O'REILLY FALANGA LLP 15th Floor, Three Gateway Center 100 Mulberry St, Newark, NJ 07102 Attorney For Defendants, World Subaru, LLC and 688 Shrewsbury, LLC Erica Tiffany Parkes, Esq. LAW OFFICE OF LESLIE A. DETORRES 300 Executive Drive Suite 230 West Orange, New Jersey 07052 Attorney for Defendant, Rosario Salas Michele Frances Benenato, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF PAMELA D. HARGROVE 100 Walnut Avenue, Suite 602 Clark, New Jersey 07066 Attorney for Defendant, Allstate New Jersey Property and Casualty Insurance Company COUNSELOR: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorneys for the Defendant, Diane C. Barr-Kramer, shall apply to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, New Jersey, on March 28, 2024 at nine o'clock in the forenoon or as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard, for an order extending discovery. - 2 - ESX-L-001615-24 03/06/2024 11:36:17 AM Pg 3 of 3 Trans ID: LCV2024590259 We shall rely upon the attached Certified Statement in support hereof. Pursuant to R. 1:6-2(a), a copy of the proposed form of Order is annexed hereto and the motion shall be deemed uncontested unless responsive papers are timely filed and served stating with particularity the basis of the opposition to the relief sought. Pursuant to R. 1:6-2(d), the moving party waives oral argument unless opposing papers are timely filed and served. WE HEREBY CERTIFY that the original of the within Notice of Motion has been filed with the Motions Clerk of Essex County and a copy of same has been transmitted to all parties. HARDIN, KUNDLA, MCKEON & POLETTO, PA Attorneys for Defendant, Diane C. Barr-Kramer By: Jenna K. Clemente, Esq. DATED: March 6, 2024 2 ESX-L-001615-24 03/06/2024 11:36:17 AM Pg 1 of 3 Trans ID: LCV2024590259 Jenna K. Clemente, Esq. NJ Attorney ID 275792018 HARDIN, KUNDLA, MCKEON & POLETTO COUNSELLORS AT LAW A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 673 MORRIS AVENUE SPRINGFIELD, NEW JERSEY 07081 (973) 912-5222 Attorneys for Defendant, Diane C. Barr-Kramer : DIANE KRAMER, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY : LAW DIVISION: ESSEX COUNTY Plaintiff, Docket No. ESX-L-458-23 : vs. Civil Action : WORLD SUBARU, LLC, 688 SHREWSBURY, LLC, CORPORATION : ORDER SERVICE COMPANY, ROSARIO SALAS, ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY : PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURNACE COMPANY, : Defendants. : SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY ROSARIO SALAS, : LAW DIVISION: ESSEX COUNTY Docket No. ESX-L-1615-24 Plaintiff, : vs. Civil Action : DIANE C. BARR-KRAMER, : Defendants. ESX-L-001615-24 03/06/2024 11:36:17 AM Pg 2 of 3 Trans ID: LCV2024590259 This matter having been opened to the Court upon the application of HARDIN, KUNDLA, MCKEON & POLETTO, PA, attorneys for Defendant, Diane C. Barr-Kramer, for an Order extending the time for discovery pursuant to Rule 4:24-1 and the Court having considered the moving papers and for good cause and exceptional circumstances shown; IT IS on this day of , 2024, ORDERED that the time for completion of discovery is hereby extended; and it is further ORDERED that the new discovery end date is October 30, 2024; and it is further ORDERED that the following discovery is to proceed in this discovery extension period: Discovery To Be Completed By: Written Discovery April 30, 2024 Depositions June 30, 2024 Plaintiff Expert Report(s) July 15, 2024 Plaintiff IME August 31, 2024 Defendant Expert Report(s) October 15, 2024 Any remaining discovery October 30, 2024 ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be deemed served upon all counsel via electronic filing. ESX-L-001615-24 03/06/2024 11:36:17 AM Pg 3 of 3 Trans ID: LCV2024590259 , J.S.C. ___ Unopposed ___ Opposed ESX-L-001615-24 03/06/2024 11:36:17 AM Pg 1 of 6 Trans ID: LCV2024590259 Jenna K. Clemente, Esq. NJ Attorney ID 275792018 HARDIN, KUNDLA, MCKEON & POLETTO COUNSELLORS AT LAW A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 673 MORRIS AVENUE SPRINGFIELD, NEW JERSEY 07081 (973) 912-5222 Attorneys for Defendant, Diane C. Barr-Kramer : DIANE KRAMER, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY : LAW DIVISION: ESSEX COUNTY Plaintiff, Docket No. ESX-L-458-23 : vs. Civil Action : WORLD SUBARU, LLC, 688 SHREWSBURY, LLC, CORPORATION : CERTIFIED STATEMENT SERVICE COMPANY, ROSARIO SALAS, ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY PROPERTY : AND CASUALTY INSURNACE COMPANY, : Defendants. : SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY ROSARIO SALAS, LAW DIVISION: ESSEX COUNTY : Docket No. ESX-L-1615-24 Plaintiff, vs. : Civil Action DIANE C. BARR-KRAMER, : CERTIFIED STATEMENT Defendants. : ESX-L-001615-24 03/06/2024 11:36:17 AM Pg 2 of 6 Trans ID: LCV2024590259 Jenna K. Clemente, hereby certifies that: 1. I am an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey and have been entrusted with the handling of the defense of the within matter on behalf of Defendant, Diane C. Barr-Kramer. 2. This Certified Statement is made in support of Defendant's motion to extend discovery. 3. In the Plaintiff Diane Kramer matter, a Consent Order extending the time for discovery an additional sixty (60) days as set forth in Rule 4:24-1(c) was consented to by all parties and the discovery end date was previously extended to February 17, 2024. See Exhibit A. 4. In the Plaintiff Rosario Salas matter, the initial discovery end date is October 30, 2024 and has not yet been subject to any discovery extensions. 5. On February 23, 2024, the undersigned’s motion to consolidate and transfer the Plaintiff Rosario Salas matter from Union County to Essex County was granted. However, Judge Venable declined the portion of the order regarding the discovery extension and stated that the discovery end date shall be determined by the trial judge. See Exhibit B. 6. The Plaintiff Rosario Salas matter was only officially transferred and given an Essex County docket number on March 6, 2024. The instant motion was filed shortly thereafter. 1 ESX-L-001615-24 03/06/2024 11:36:17 AM Pg 3 of 6 Trans ID: LCV2024590259 7. The matters have only just been consolidated and discovery in the Salas matter has not yet been exchanged. While the discovery end date expired in the Plaintiff Kramer matter on February 17, 2024, the parties made a good faith attempt to extend discovery prior to the expiration of the discovery period by including the request in the motion to consolidate and transfer - - however, that portion of the order was denied without prejudice to permit the pre-trial judge the opportunity to set the discovery end date. See Exhibit B. 8. An extension of the consolidated discovery end date is sought in order to complete the discovery set forth below. 9. Good cause and exceptional circumstances exist as a basis for this request. 10. Our system of justice favors the fair disposition of cases on their merits. Viviano v. CBS, Inc., 101 N.J. 538, 547 (1986). Exceptional circumstances can arise where trial dates or other litigation deadlines should be extended in the interest of justice and to avoid punishing litigants unfairly. Leitner v. Toms River Reg’l Sch., 392 N.J. Super. 80, 91-94 (App. Div. 2007). 11. In Vitti v. Brown, 359 N.J. Super. 40 (Law Div. 2003), the Court established a four-part test for determining whether a movant has shown “exceptional circumstances” for a discovery extension requested after the discovery period has expired. A 2 ESX-L-001615-24 03/06/2024 11:36:17 AM Pg 4 of 6 Trans ID: LCV2024590259 movant must show: (1) why discovery has not been completed within time and counsel’s diligence in pursuing discovery during that time; (2) the additional discovery or disclosure sought is essential; (3) an explanation for counsel’s failure to request an extension of the time for discovery within the original time period; and (4) the circumstances presented were clearly beyond control of the attorney and litigant seeking the extension of time. Rivers v. LSC Partnership, 378 N.J. Super. 68, 79 (App. Div. 2005) (citing Vitti, supra at 51). 12. Despite best efforts of counsel, discovery remains incomplete. 13. As previously indicated, the Plaintiff Salas matter is in the early stages of discovery. We have not yet exchanged written discovery, conducted depositions, or exchanged expert reports. 14. As of the filing of this application, the undersigned is unaware of the status of discovery in the Plaintiff Kramer matter as the matters were only consolidated on February 23, 2024. However, it should be noted that a new party only recently filed an answer so it is anticipated that additional discovery is outstanding in that matter as well. 15. The above discovery is critical and necessary to the undersigned’s ability to defend this matter. 3 ESX-L-001615-24 03/06/2024 11:36:17 AM Pg 5 of 6 Trans ID: LCV2024590259 16. This outstanding discovery could not have been completed sooner as the new injury and resumed treatment could not have been anticipated by the parties or counsel. 17. No party will be prejudiced if the instant application is granted. 18. All parties will be prejudiced if the above outstanding discovery is not completed. 19. Defendant requests that the discovery end date be extended to October 30, 2024 in order to complete the following discovery: Discovery To Be Completed By: Written Discovery April 30, 2024 Depositions June 30, 2024 Plaintiff Expert Report(s) July 15, 2024 Plaintiff IME August 31, 2024 Defendant Expert Report(s) October 15, 2024 Any remaining discovery October 30, 2024 20. These matters are not currently the subject of any arbitration, case management conference, or trial date. 21. The undersigned has received consent from my adversaries to file the instant application to extend discovery. 22. Should the Court be inclined to deny the instant application, then it is respectfully requested that these consolidated matters be scheduled for a case management conference 4 ESX-L-001615-24 03/06/2024 11:36:17 AM Pg 6 of 6 Trans ID: LCV2024590259 so the discovery schedule can be addressed with the Court and all counsel. I hereby certify that the foregoing statements made by me are true. I am aware that if any of the statements made by me are willfully false, I am subject to punishment. Jenna K. Clemente DATED: March 6, 2024 5 ESX-L-001615-24 03/06/2024 11:36:17 AM Pg 1 of 2 Trans ID: LCV2024590259 PROOF OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that: 1. On March 6, 2024, I caused to be delivered to the addressees listed below, by E-filing, a copy of the within Notice of Motion. Anneris V. Hernandez, Esq. FREDSON STATMORE BITTERMAN, LLC 200 Broadacres Drive, Suite 180 Bloomfield, New Jersey 07003 Attorney for Plaintiff, Diane Kramer Sander Budanitsk, Esq. SANDER BUDANITSKY LLC 520 W 1st Ave Roselle, New Jersey 07203 Attorney for Plaintiff, Rosario Salas David Cramer, Esq. WALSH PIZZI O'REILLY FALANGA LLP 15th Floor, Three Gateway Center 100 Mulberry St, Newark, NJ 07102 Attorney For Defendants, World Subaru, LLC and 688 Shrewsbury, LLC Erica Tiffany Parkes, Esq. LAW OFFICE OF LESLIE A. DETORRES 300 Executive Drive Suite 230 West Orange, New Jersey 07052 Attorney for Defendant, Rosario Salas Michele Frances Benenato, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF PAMELA D. HARGROVE 100 Walnut Avenue, Suite 602 Clark, New Jersey 07066 Attorney for Defendant, Allstate New Jersey Property and Casualty Insurance Company ESX-L-001615-24 03/06/2024 11:36:17 AM Pg 2 of 2 Trans ID: LCV2024590259 The foregoing statement made by me is true. I am aware that if the statement is willfully false, I am subject to punishment. Jenna K. Clemente 2 ESX-L-001615-24 03/06/2024 11:36:17 AM Pg 1 of 2 Trans ID: LCV2024590259 Exhibit A ESX-L-000458-23 ESX-L-001615-24 10/06/2023 03/06/202412:22:38 11:36:17PM AM Pg Pg12of of12 Trans TransID: ID:LCV20233065114 LCV2024590259 200 Broadacres Drive, Suite 180, Bloomfield, New Jersey 07003-3156 973-777-8600 973-777-8645 www.fredsonstatmore.com BARRY FREDSON (Retired) ✽ ☐ ○ ✽ CERTIFIED BY THE SUPREME COURT ANDREW L. STATMORE ☐ ○ ♢ ☆ OF NJ AS A CIVIL TRIAL ATTORNEY LANCE J. BITTERMAN ☐ ☐ MEMBER NEW JERSEY BAR NICHOLAS J. WALTMAN ☐ ○ ○ MEMBER NEW YORK BAR MICHAEL A. GALLARDO☐ ○ ♢ MEMBER FLORIDA BAR RONALD W. SOLARES ☐ ○ ☆ MEMBER D.C. BAR ARJUN A. SHARMA ☐ ○ ALEXANDRA LOPRETE ☐ ○ ANNERIS V. HERNANDEZ ☐ ○ ALPHONSE PETRACCO☐ October 2, 2023 Via E-filing Superior Court of New Jersey Essex County - Civil Division Re: Kramer, Diane v. World Subaru, LLC, et als. Docket No.: ESX-L-458-23 Our File No.: 27421 Dear Sir/Madam: Please be advised that we represent the Plaintiff in the above matter. In that regard, and in order to facilitate litigation in this matter, I respectfully request, pursuant New Jersey Civil Rule 4:24-1(c), that discovery be extended for a period of sixty (60) days, from December 19, 2023 to February 17, 2024. We are making this request with the consent of my adversaries. Thank you for your kind consideration in this matter. Please contact me immediately should you require additional information in this matter. Respectfully submitted, FREDSON STATMORE BITTERMAN, LLC /s/ Anneris V. Hernandez ANNERIS V. HERNANDEZ, ESQ. AVH/ kl CC: David D. Cramer, Esq. and Michele Benenato, Esq. via e-filing. ESX-L-001615-24 03/06/2024 11:36:17 AM Pg 1 of 6 Trans ID: LCV2024590259 Exhibit B ESX-L-001615-24 ESX-L-000458-23 03/06/2024 02/23/2024 11:36:17Pg AM1 ofPg 5 2Trans of 6 ID: Trans LCV2024481602 ID: LCV2024590259 Jenna K. Clemente, Esq. NJ Attorney ID 275792018 Mark S. Kundla, Esq. NJ Attorney ID 027361981 HARDIN, KUNDLA, MCKEON & POLETTO COUNSELLORS AT LAW A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Granted. 673 MORRIS AVENUE SPRINGFIELD, NEW JERSEY 07081 (973) 912-5222 Attorneys for Defendant, Diane C. Barr-Kramer DIANE KRAMER, : SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY Plaintiff, : LAW DIVISION: ESSEX COUNTY Docket No. ESX-L-458-23 vs. : Civil Action WORLD SUBARU, LLC, 688 : SHREWSBURY, LLC, CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY, ROSARIO SALAS, : ORDER ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURNACE COMPANY, : Defendants. : ROSARIO SALAS, : SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY Plaintiff, : LAW DIVISION: UNION COUNTY vs. Docket No. UNN-L-3340-23 : DIANE C. BARR-KRAMER, Civil Action : Defendants. : ORDER ESX-L-001615-24 ESX-L-000458-23 03/06/2024 02/23/2024 11:36:17Pg AM2 ofPg 5 3Trans of 6 ID: Trans LCV2024481602 ID: LCV2024590259 This matter having been opened to the Court upon the application of Hardin, Kundla, McKeon & Poletto, P.A., attorneys for defendant, Diane C. Barr-Kramer, for an Order consolidating the case of Kramer v. World Subaru, LLC, et al., bearing Docket No. ESX-L-458-23, with the case of Salas v. Barr-Kramer, et al., bearing Docket No. UNN-L-3340-23; and for an Order transferring the venue of Salas v. Barr-Kramer, et al. (UNN-L-3340-23) from Union County to Essex County and extending discovery in the Kramer matter, and the Court having considered the moving papers and for good cause shown; IT IS on this 23RD day of February , 2024, ORDERED that Salas v. Barr-Kramer, et al. (UNN-L-3340-23) is transferred from Union County to Essex County and is consolidated with Essex County Docket No.: ESX-L-0458-23; and it is further ORDERED that the above-entitled actions Kramer v. World Subaru, LLC, et al. and Salas v. Barr-Kramer, et al. be and are hereby consolidated for discovery and trial in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County as the cases involve common questions of law and fact arising out of the same incident; and it is further ESX-L-001615-24 ESX-L-000458-23 03/06/2024 02/23/2024 11:36:17Pg AM3 ofPg 5 4Trans of 6 ID: Trans LCV2024481602 ID: LCV2024590259 ORDERED that the discovery end date in the consolidated matters is October 30, 2024; and it is further ORDERED that the Motion to Consolidate and Transfer Venue is GRANTED. ORDERED that the discovery end date shall be determined by the trial judge ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be served upon all counsel via E-Courts. /s/ Sheila Venable____ A.J.S.C. __X__ Unopposed ____ Opposed ESX-L-001615-24 ESX-L-000458-23 03/06/2024 02/23/2024 11:36:17Pg AM4 ofPg 5 5Trans of 6 ID: Trans LCV2024481602 ID: LCV2024590259 ESX-L-0458-23 STATEMENT OF REASONING The matters arose out of the same motor vehicle accident, which occurred on September 29, 2022, in Chatham, Morris County, New Jersey. See Union Compl. On January 19, 2023, Diane Kramer (“Essex Plaintiff”), filed a Complaint against World Subaru, LLC., 688 Shrewsbury, LLC., Corporation Service Company, Rosario Salas, Allstate New Jersey Property and Casualty Insurance Company, and fictitious defendants in Essex County (‘Essex Action”). See Essex Compl. Essex Plaintiff resides in Monroe, Middlesex County, New Jersey. Id. Essex Plaintiff alleges injuries as a result of a January 23, 2022, slip and fall and a September 29, 2022, motor vehicle accident. Id. On October 11, 2023, Rosario Salas (“Union Plaintiff”), filed a Complaint against Diane C. Barr- Kramer in Union County (“Union Action”). See Union Compl. Union Plaintiff resides in Union, Union County, New Jersey. Id. Union Plaintiff alleges personal injuries arising out of the September 29, 2022, motor vehicle accident involving Defendant, Diane C. Barr-Kramer. Id. On January 29, 2024, Diane C. Barr-Kramer (“Moving Plaintiff/Defendant”), filed this instant Motion to Consolidate and Transfer Venue. See Cert. of Jenna K. Clemente. Moving Plaintiff/Defendant alleges that the above actions, in part, arise out of the same September 29, 2022, motor vehicle accident. Id. ¶ 9. Accordingly, Moving Plaintiff/Defendant argues the above actions involve common questions and law and fact. Id. ¶ 10. Id. ¶ 17. Moving Plaintiff/Defendant argues the above actions overlap parties and, for at least a portion of the Essex Plaintiff, arise out of the same motor vehicle accident on September 29, 2022. Id. ¶ 19. Moving Plaintiff/Defendant argues that a consolidation of the above actions will facilitate the necessity of duplicate trials upon identical issues of law and fact and a consolidation of these actions will more efficiently utilize the time of the court, the parties, and counsel. Id. ¶¶ 21-22. Moving Plaintiff/Defendant also argues that a consolidation of these actions will prevent the risk of potentially inconsistent verdicts. Id. ¶ 23. See also Moraes v. Wesler, 439 N.J. Super. 375 (App. Div. 2015). Moving Plaintiff/Defendant also explains that while the Essex Action is older than the Union Action, an additional party only recently filed an answer in the Essex Action on October 27, 2023. Id. ¶ 24. Moving Plaintiff/Defendant explain the consolidation of the above matters will not significantly delay the completion of discovery or the state of trial as these cases will need to be tried together. Ibid. Moving Plaintiff/Defendant request that the new discovery end date for the consolidated actions be adjusted to October 30, 2024. Id. ¶ 29. Therefore, Moving Plaintiff/Defendant respectfully request the Court to enter an Order consolidating the above actions and to change venue to Essex County, pursuant to R. 4:48-1. Id. ¶ 28. No Opposition filed. “R. 4:38-1 provides: “When actions involving a common question of law or fact arising out of the same transaction or series of transactions are pending in the Superior Court, the court on a party’s or its own motion may order the actions consolidated.” (emphasis added) R. 4:38-1. Further, “[i]f the actions are not triable in the same county or vicinage, the order shall be made ESX-L-001615-24 ESX-L-000458-23 03/06/2024 02/23/2024 11:36:17Pg AM5 ofPg 5 6Trans of 6 ID: Trans LCV2024481602 ID: LCV2024590259 by the Assignment Judge of the county in which the venue is laid in the action first instituted….” Id. Here, the first action, ESX-L-0458-23, was filed in Essex County. Therefore, the Assignment Judge of Essex County has jurisdiction of this Motion under R. 4:38-1. “R. 4:38-1 makes no express provision for a change of venue….” Robert T. Winzinger, Inc. v. Brennan Bros. Inc., 191 N.J. Super. 114, 119 (Law Div. 1983). Generally, the Assignment Judge has discretion to consolidate cases, and the decision will be set aside only “if it manifestly erroneous.” See Pressler & Verniero, Current N.J. Court Rules, cmt. 1 on R. 4:38-1 (2022) (citing Moraes v. Wesler, 439 N.J. Super. 375, 378-379 (App. Div. 2015). The rule provides: “If actions pending in different venues are consolidated, the order shall specify the venue in which the consolidated action shall proceed….” R. 4:38-1(c)(2). “This language invites the discretion by the Assignment Judge; [s]he may therefore select venue on the basis of fairness after a consideration of all facts.” Winzinger, 191 N.J. Super. at 119. Here, the Essex County and Union County actions, in part, arise out of the same motor vehicle accident. The two actions involve Essex Plaintiff and Union Defendant, Diane C. Barr-Kramer, and Essex Defendant and Union Plaintiff, Rosario Salas. Essex Plaintiff resides in Middlesex County and Union Plaintiff resides in Union County. Allstate New Jersey Property and Casualty Insurance Company conducts business through out the State of New Jersey, including Essex County. This Court finds that in the interest of avoiding duplicate work, preserving judicial resources, and preventing contradictory findings of fact and conclusions of law, the pending actions will be consolidated, and the consolidated actions shall proceed in Essex County. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff/Moving Defendant’s Motion to Consolidate is GRANTED, and the consolidated actions shall proceed in Essex County under Docket No.: ESX-L-0458-23. Additionally, the trial judge shall determine the discovery end date.