arrow left
arrow right
  • Wendell Tang, M.D., as Representative of the Estate of Luke Tang vs. President and Fellows of Harvard College et al Wrongful Death - Non-medical, G.L.c.229, §2A document preview
  • Wendell Tang, M.D., as Representative of the Estate of Luke Tang vs. President and Fellows of Harvard College et al Wrongful Death - Non-medical, G.L.c.229, §2A document preview
  • Wendell Tang, M.D., as Representative of the Estate of Luke Tang vs. President and Fellows of Harvard College et al Wrongful Death - Non-medical, G.L.c.229, §2A document preview
  • Wendell Tang, M.D., as Representative of the Estate of Luke Tang vs. President and Fellows of Harvard College et al Wrongful Death - Non-medical, G.L.c.229, §2A document preview
  • Wendell Tang, M.D., as Representative of the Estate of Luke Tang vs. President and Fellows of Harvard College et al Wrongful Death - Non-medical, G.L.c.229, §2A document preview
  • Wendell Tang, M.D., as Representative of the Estate of Luke Tang vs. President and Fellows of Harvard College et al Wrongful Death - Non-medical, G.L.c.229, §2A document preview
						
                                

Preview

Date Filed 3/28/2024 1:22 PM Superior Court - Middlesex Docket Number 1881CV02603 79.1 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS MIDDLESEX, ss. SUPERIOR COURT DEPT. C.A. No.: 18-2603 ______________________________ WENDALL TANG, M.D., as ) Representative of the Estate of ) LUKE TANG, ) ) 3/28/2024 Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MELANIE NORTHROP, MSW, ) LICSW, ) Defendant. ) ______________________________) PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE REGARDING SUICIDES AT HARVARD WITH WHICH THE DEFENDANT MELANIE NORTHROP WAS NOT INVOLVED Now comes the Plaintiff, Wendell Tang and submits the following opposition to the Defendant’s motion in limine to preclude evidence regarding suicides at Harvard with which the Defendant, Melanie Northrop, MSW, LICSW was not involved. Under Massachusetts law, Ms. Northrop’s conduct in this trial will be judged by whether she deviated from the standard of care of the average qualified social worker/case manager. “Negligence of a physician who practices a specialty consists of a failure to exercise the degree of care and skill of the average qualified physician practicing that specialty, taking into account the advances in the profession and the resources available to the physician.” Stepakoff v. Kantar, 393 Mass. 836, 840 (1985). Accordingly, Ms. Northrop’s subjective understanding of Harvard’s extensive student suicide history is largely irrelevant when evaluating what the average qualified case worker would have known or done under the circumstances such as existed at Harvard as of 2014-2015. 1 mr Date Filed 3/28/2024 1:22 PM Superior Court - Middlesex Docket Number 1881CV02603 Secondly, to the extent Ms. Northrop contends that only her actual knowledge of attempted suicides acquired from students with whom she dealt, her desire to have limited accountability misses the mark. Ms. Northrop’s acts or omissions, as a matter of general negligence principles, can result in liability based upon information she knew or should have known. Ms. Northrop was the sole social worker/case manager working for Harvard University Health Services at times relevant to this case. She also acted liaison to students who were referred for in-patient care to McLean Hospital, such as Luke Tang. It is not prejudicial to suggest that Ms. Northrop should have known of the data readily available to her regarding, inter alia, student suicide attempts, the frequency of student in-patient mental health hospitalizations and students on care contracts for mental health issues (including attempted suicide) to better inform the discharge of her job responsibilities. 1 WHEREFORE, Ms. Northrop should be held to the standard of care of the average qualified social worker/case manager. To the extent she lacked information about the depth of mental health issues within the Harvard student body, her lack of knowledge demonstrates a deviation from the standard of care and is relevant to the Harvard mental health environment. Ms. Northrop was the front person for HUHS dealing with care contracts and acted as liaison with McLean Hospital regardless of her individual work with a student. 1 The Plaintiff intends to supplement this motion with documentary evidence depending upon how the Court may rule on other issues relating to the conduct of the trial. There presently exists a protective order in place on the case which precludes the Plaintiff, and Ms. Northrop from appending discovery materials to, or information included in any discovery materials within, any court filing as Harvard marked every single document it produced in discovery as “Confidential.” 2 Date Filed 3/28/2024 1:22 PM Superior Court - Middlesex Docket Number 1881CV02603 Respectfully Submitted, WENDELL TANG, M.D., Plaintiff, By his attorneys, /s/ David W. Heinlein ________________________________ David W. Heinlein, Esquire, BBO# 550598 Jeffrey S. Beeler, Esquire, BBO# 563679 Heinlein Beeler Mingace & Heineman, P.C. 276 Union Avenue Framingham, MA 01702 (508) 626-8500 DHeinlein@HBMHlaw.com JBeeler@HBMHlaw.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, David W. Heinlein, hereby certify that on the 27th day of March, 2024, I caused a true and accurate copy of the foregoing document to be served by email only upon all counsel of record: William J. Dailey III, Esq. Victoria C. Goetz Berlyand, Esq. SLOANE AND WALSH LLP One Boston Place, 16th Floor Boston, MA 02108 Wdailey3@sloanewalsh.com Vgoetz@sloanewalsh.com /s/ David W. Heinlein ______________________________ David W. Heinlein 3