arrow left
arrow right
  • Chassity Myers VS Terry ThomasModification - Child Support document preview
  • Chassity Myers VS Terry ThomasModification - Child Support document preview
  • Chassity Myers VS Terry ThomasModification - Child Support document preview
  • Chassity Myers VS Terry ThomasModification - Child Support document preview
  • Chassity Myers VS Terry ThomasModification - Child Support document preview
  • Chassity Myers VS Terry ThomasModification - Child Support document preview
  • Chassity Myers VS Terry ThomasModification - Child Support document preview
  • Chassity Myers VS Terry ThomasModification - Child Support document preview
						
                                

Preview

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA CHASSITY MYERS : : Plaintiff : : Civil Action V. : : File No. 23FM4232 TERRY THOMAS : : Defendant : MOTION TO QUASH AND MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER COMES NOW CHASSITY MYERS, Plaintiff and files this, Third Party Motion to Quash and Motion for Protective Order, pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 9-11-34 and O.C.G.A. § 24-13-23(b)(1) and O.C.G.A. §16-5-94(d)(3) respectfully showing this Court the following: 1. Subpoena for Production of Evidence was served in this case to Truist Bank. 2. Plaintiff shows that the subpoena for the production of documents is irrelevant to the instant action, as Plaintiff has already produced one year with of bank statements, Plaintiff was unemployed for 75% of this action so therefore there is nothing relevant that needs to be discovered. 3. Plaintiff shows that the subpoena for the production of documents is irrelevant Chassity Myers v. Terry Thomas 23FM4232 DeKalb County Superior Court Motion to Quash Page 1 of 4 to the instant action in large part, and is both harassing and vexing to Plaintiff. 4. Moreover, this subpoena is a discovery expedition by Defendant to embarrass and encumber the Plaintiff which is overbroad, unreasonable, oppressive, and vague. See Washburn v. Sardi’s Restaurant et al., 191 Ga. App. 307 (1989) and O.C.G.A. § 24-10-22 (b) (1) and O.C.G.A. § 50-18-72(a)(1). 5. Additionally said subpoena has no legitimate and/or good faith basis. 6. Undersigned counsel shows that Pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 9-15-14, the Defendant’s subpoena request for production is without merit. 7. Plaintiff shows that she has had to incur legal fees in order to defend herself against this subpoena and requests that she be reimbursed. WHEREFORE, PLAINTIFF PRAYS: a) The Court quash the Subpoena for the Production of Documents and issue a Protective Order AND Chassity Myers v. Terry Thomas 23FM4232 DeKalb County Superior Court Motion to Quash Page 2 of 4 b) For such other and further relief as this Court deems appropriate under the circumstances including an award of attorney fees. This the _28__ day of March 2024. Respectfully submitted, Jennifer Yoxall Bar No. 656361 Attorney for Plaintiff Yoxall Family Law One West Court Square Suite 750 Decatur, GA 30030 (678) 420-5534 jennifer@yoxlaw.com Chassity Myers v. Terry Thomas 23FM4232 DeKalb County Superior Court Motion to Quash Page 3 of 4 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA CHASSITY MYERS : : Plaintiff : : Civil Action V. : : File No. 23FM4232 TERRY THOMAS : : Defendant : CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This certifies that the undersigned counsel has served the Defendant via electronic service with this Motion to Quash and Protective Order. This the _28_ day of March 2024. Respectfully submitted, Jennifer Yoxall Bar No. 656361 Attorney for Plaintiff Yoxall Family Law One West Court Square Suite 750 Decatur, GA 30030 (678) 420-5534 jennifer@yoxlaw.com Chassity Myers v. Terry Thomas 23FM4232 DeKalb County Superior Court Motion to Quash Page 4 of 4