On March 19, 2024 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Bandaibarra, Jose Luis,
and
Department Of Motor Vehicles, An Agency Of The State Of California, By And Through Its Director Steve Gordon,
for 02-CV Writ of Mandate-Civil Unlimited
in the District Court of Kern County.
Preview
1 MIDDLEBROOK & ASSOCIATES
Richard O. Middlebrook SBN 167723
2 Gabrielle A. Burnett SBN 317179
3 8501 Brimhall Road, Suite 404
Bakersfield, CA 93312
4 Telephone: (661) 636-1333
5
Facsimile: (661) 636-1343
6
Attorney for Petitioner, Jose Luis Bandaibarra
7
8
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
9
COUNTY OF KERN
10
11 JOSE LUIS BANDAIBARRA, Case No.: BCV-24-100980 BCB
12 DMV Case No.: F7530004
Petitioner,
13 ORDER STAYING SUSPENSION OF
DRIVING PRIVILEGE PENDING
14 vs.
DETERMINATION OF VERIFIED
15 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE
DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR
16 VEHICLES, an agency of the State of
California, by and through its Director Date: April 3, 2024
17
Steven Gorden, Time: 8:30 a.m.
18 Respondent. Dept.: H
19
20
The Ex Parte Application of Petitioner Jose Luis Bandaibarra Requesting a Stay of
21
Enforcement of the Administrative Order Suspending Petitioner’s Driving Privilege
22
Pending Determination of the Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate came on for hearing on
23
April 3, 2024, in the above-entitled court, Gabrielle A. Burnett appearing as counsel for
24
Petitioner. Proper notice having been provided to Respondent; Ernesto J. Fong of the Office
25
of the Attorney General appeared on behalf of Respondent.
26
27
28
_____________________________________________________________________________
Order Granting Stay of Suspension
1
1 The Court, having read and considered the Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate, the
2 Ex Parte Application for Stay of Enforcement of Administrative Order Pending
3 Determination of Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate, and the Declaration in Support of
4 Ex Parte Application for Stay of Enforcement of Administrative Order Pending
5 Determination of Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate, and having heard and considered
6 the argument of counsel, and good cause appearing therefrom, made the following ruling:
7 argument of counsel, and good cause appearing therefrom, made the following ruling:
8
9 Petitioner’s Ex Parte Application for Stay of Enforcement of Administrative Order
10 Pending Determination of Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate is granted, and the
11
Department’s Orders suspending Petitioner’s driving privilege are stayed, pending
12
the hearing and judgment of the Court in this matter, subject to the following
13
14 conditions:
15
1. Petitioner may drive during the hours of 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through
16
Saturday for work related purposes;
17
18 2. Petitioner may not operate a motor vehicle with any measurable amount of alcohol or
19 other intoxicants in petitioner's blood;
20
3. Petitioner must submit to a blood or breath test at the request of any peace officer, with
21
22 or without probable cause, to determine petitioner's blood alcohol content while
23 operating a motor vehicle;
24
///
25
26 ///
27
28
_____________________________________________________________________________
Order Granting Stay of Suspension
2
1 4. Petitioner shall have in petitioner's possession at all times while operating a motor
2 vehicle a legible copy of this court's order specifying the foregoing conditions and
3
shall immediately produce such order for inspection each time a peace officer asks to
4
see his driver's license.
5
6
7
Dated: _______________ ______________________________
8
Honorable Judge of the Superior Court
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
_____________________________________________________________________________
Order Granting Stay of Suspension
3
Document Filed Date
April 03, 2024
Case Filing Date
March 19, 2024
Category
02-CV Writ of Mandate-Civil Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.