On January 08, 2018 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Minsky, Diana,
and
All Other Occupants In Possession,
Chacon, Gilma,
Chacon, Jorge, Jr,
Chacon, Jorge, Sr,
Does 1 To 5,
Duron, Sugey,
for civil
in the District Court of San Mateo County.
Preview
John F. L66, SBN 154323 F E L E @
15 Boardman Place, Second Floor
‘
SAN MATEO GO TNTY
San Francisco, CA 94103
(415) 863—4336
Attorney for Defendants
Jorge Chacon Jr., Jorge Chacon SF,
Sugey Duron,
O©OO\TO\UJJ>U3[\)»—A
Gilma Chacon
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
DIANA MINSKY, Case No.: 18@0019
_
‘
‘
Plaintiff, 1%) ORDER
RELIEF AGAINST FORFEITURE
SEA/Y LNG
or
_
.—4
V- '
LEASE/STAY OF EXECUTION or
*—‘
~—
JORGE CHACON Jr., JORGE CHACON Sr, JUDGMENT ((3-01)- § 1179)-
SUSIE DURAN, GILMA CHACON,
[\3
>—A
Does l —
5, Date: March 26, 2018
Time: 9:00 am.
U3
._"
Defendants. Dept. Law and Motion
b
>—-A
L11
)—
The petition of Jorge Chacon, Sr., Gilma Chacon, Sugey Duron and Jorge Cliacon Jr.for
0\
r—a
the order hereinafter made came on regularly for hearing this day, March 26, 2018, John F.
\l
>—‘
Lee appeared as attorney for petitioner and Michael Bitondo appeared as attorney for plaintiff in
the above—entitled action.
,
00
i»——-
On proof being made to the satisfaction of the court, and good cause appearing therefor;
(3
7-—
I
Itis hereby ordered:
[\J O
Defendants Jorge Chacon J r.’s,
Jorge Chacon Sr..’s,Sugey Duron’s, and Gilma Chacjon’s
—‘.
N
Motion/Petition
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
for Relief from Forfeiture, filed pursuant to Code Civ. Proc. § ,
[\J N
1179, is DENIED. After reviewing the moving papers and balancing the equities, the Court
finds Defendants have not met their burden of demonstrating entitlement to relief under 1179.
UUL-UUU'IH
Denying
N U3 §
1051449
Order
Nb
18-
OD
li ll \
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT:
/
[\J
{JJ
26 (4%?
)
ORDER
.
3’24"! “l
Minsky v. Chacon, Case No.
‘2
18UDL00019
(/7
#1
jVQ—‘fiv
/
ML SUSAN
R‘Wf!
GREENBERG
(W
L2)
Dated: March 26, 2018
Judge ofthe Superior Court
\OCX)\]O‘\&J1.£>
Order Shortenint Time for Petition CCP § 1179 2
Minsky v. Chacon, No. 18UDL00019
Document Filed Date
March 26, 2018
Case Filing Date
January 08, 2018
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
John F. L66, SBN 154323 F E L E @ 15 Boardman Place, Second Floor ‘ SAN MATEO GO TNTY San Francisco, CA 94103 (415) 863—4336 Attorney for Defendants Jorge Chacon Jr., Jorge Chacon SF, Sugey Duron, O©OO\TO\UJJ>U3[\)»—A Gilma Chacon SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO DIANA MINSKY, Case No.: 18@0019 _ ‘ ‘ Plaintiff, 1%) ORDER RELIEF AGAINST FORFEITURE SEA/Y LNG or _ .—4 V- ' LEASE/STAY OF EXECUTION or *—‘ ~— JORGE CHACON Jr., JORGE CHACON Sr, JUDGMENT ((3-01)- § 1179)- SUSIE DURAN, GILMA CHACON, [\3 >—A Does l — 5, Date: March 26, 2018 Time: 9:00 am. U3 ._" Defendants. Dept. Law and Motion b >—-A L11 )— The petition of Jorge Chacon, Sr., Gilma Chacon, Sugey Duron and Jorge Cliacon Jr.for 0\ r—a the order hereinafter made came on regularly for hearing this day, March 26, 2018, John F. \l >—‘ Lee appeared as attorney for petitioner and Michael Bitondo appeared as attorney for plaintiff in the above—entitled action. , 00 i»——- On proof being made to the satisfaction of the court, and good cause appearing therefor; (3 7-— I Itis hereby ordered: [\J O Defendants Jorge Chacon J r.’s, Jorge Chacon Sr..’s,Sugey Duron’s, and Gilma Chacjon’s —‘. N Motion/Petition lllllllllllllllllllllllllllll for Relief from Forfeiture, filed pursuant to Code Civ. Proc. § , [\J N 1179, is DENIED. After reviewing the moving papers and balancing the equities, the Court finds Defendants have not met their burden of demonstrating entitlement to relief under 1179. UUL-UUU'IH Denying N U3 § 1051449 Order Nb 18- OD li ll \ IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT: / [\J {JJ 26 (4%? ) ORDER . 3’24"! “l Minsky v. Chacon, Case No. ‘2 18UDL00019 (/7 #1 jVQ—‘fiv / ML SUSAN R‘Wf! GREENBERG (W L2) Dated: March 26, 2018 Judge ofthe Superior Court \OCX)\]O‘\&J1.£> Order Shortenint Time for Petition CCP § 1179 2 Minsky v. Chacon, No. 18UDL00019