On February 04, 2002 a
Complaint,Petition
was filed
involving a dispute between
Bender, Uta,
Moellerich, Thomas,
and
for TRUST (PET. FOR DECLARATORY RELEIF RE:PETITION)
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
IOUT
San Francisco Superior Courts
Information Technology Group
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Apr-22-2002 12:53 pm
Case Number: PTR-02-282889
Filing Date: Apr-18-2002 12:53
Juke Box: 001 Image: 00404016
ORDER
IN THE MATTER OF THE WALTER MOELLERICH et al TRUST
001P00404016
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.om NIN DA PB wWN
NN YP YN NY NN NY Ye Be Be eB eB eB ee ee ee
eo ND HW PB YW YH KF SFO MRA WR DDH FS
Andrew Zabronsky, Esq. SBN 5339)
EVANS, LATHAM &
One Post Street, Suite 600 I
San Francisco, CA 94104 San Francisco CountySuperior Court
Telephone: & 15) 421-0288
Facsimile: (415) 421-0464 APR 8 2002
Attorneys for Thomas Moellerich GORDON P, LI, Clerk
AS
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA — UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
In the Matter of: Case No. PTR-02-282889
ORDER ON PETITION FOR
DECLARATORY RELIEF TO DETERMINE
WHETHER ATTACHED PETITION
CONSTITUTES A CONTEST WITHIN THE
| TERMS OF NO-CONTEST CLAUSE
The Walter and Gusti Moellerich Trust.
Petitioner Uta Bender’s Petition for Declaratory Relief came on regularly for hearing on
April 8, 2002 in the above-entitled Court, the Honorable Dorothy L. McMath, Judge Pro Tempore,
presiding. Petitioner appeared by her counsel Michael B. Bassi. Objector Thomas Moellerich
appeared by his counsel Andrew Zabronsky. Co-trustee and arbitrator, Martin Feldman, appeared
by his counsel Robert E. White. Mark Epstein appeared as counsel for the Trust. The Court having
considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the petition, as well as the argument of
counsel, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby finds and orders as follows:
The Court finds that the proposed petition, if filed, would trigger the no-contest clause of the
MUL
MMU
ORDER ON PETITION FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF
1oO IY DA BW HN &
NY NY YN YN RN YN BF Be ew Be ewe eee ei
errI aun PF HHS =F SOM IAAAR HEHE S
captioned trust. Accordingly, the petition to determine that the proposed action would not constitute
a contest is DENIED.
Dated: April //, 2002 ALZ4 ~ ze JA Pee.
Dorothy L. McMath
Judge Pro Tempore
ORDER ON PETITION FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF
2
Document Filed Date
April 18, 2002
Case Filing Date
February 04, 2002
Category
TRUST (PET. FOR DECLARATORY RELEIF RE:PETITION)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
IOUT San Francisco Superior Courts Information Technology Group Document Scanning Lead Sheet Apr-22-2002 12:53 pm Case Number: PTR-02-282889 Filing Date: Apr-18-2002 12:53 Juke Box: 001 Image: 00404016 ORDER IN THE MATTER OF THE WALTER MOELLERICH et al TRUST 001P00404016 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.om NIN DA PB wWN NN YP YN NY NN NY Ye Be Be eB eB eB ee ee ee eo ND HW PB YW YH KF SFO MRA WR DDH FS Andrew Zabronsky, Esq. SBN 5339) EVANS, LATHAM & One Post Street, Suite 600 I San Francisco, CA 94104 San Francisco CountySuperior Court Telephone: & 15) 421-0288 Facsimile: (415) 421-0464 APR 8 2002 Attorneys for Thomas Moellerich GORDON P, LI, Clerk AS SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA — UNLIMITED JURISDICTION CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO In the Matter of: Case No. PTR-02-282889 ORDER ON PETITION FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF TO DETERMINE WHETHER ATTACHED PETITION CONSTITUTES A CONTEST WITHIN THE | TERMS OF NO-CONTEST CLAUSE The Walter and Gusti Moellerich Trust. Petitioner Uta Bender’s Petition for Declaratory Relief came on regularly for hearing on April 8, 2002 in the above-entitled Court, the Honorable Dorothy L. McMath, Judge Pro Tempore, presiding. Petitioner appeared by her counsel Michael B. Bassi. Objector Thomas Moellerich appeared by his counsel Andrew Zabronsky. Co-trustee and arbitrator, Martin Feldman, appeared by his counsel Robert E. White. Mark Epstein appeared as counsel for the Trust. The Court having considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the petition, as well as the argument of counsel, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby finds and orders as follows: The Court finds that the proposed petition, if filed, would trigger the no-contest clause of the MUL MMU ORDER ON PETITION FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF 1oO IY DA BW HN & NY NY YN YN RN YN BF Be ew Be ewe eee ei errI aun PF HHS =F SOM IAAAR HEHE S captioned trust. Accordingly, the petition to determine that the proposed action would not constitute a contest is DENIED. Dated: April //, 2002 ALZ4 ~ ze JA Pee. Dorothy L. McMath Judge Pro Tempore ORDER ON PETITION FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF 2