arrow left
arrow right
  • FRANCESCA FAMBROUGH, et al  vs.  CITY OF REDWOOD CITY(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • FRANCESCA FAMBROUGH, et al  vs.  CITY OF REDWOOD CITY(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • FRANCESCA FAMBROUGH, et al  vs.  CITY OF REDWOOD CITY(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • FRANCESCA FAMBROUGH, et al  vs.  CITY OF REDWOOD CITY(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • FRANCESCA FAMBROUGH, et al  vs.  CITY OF REDWOOD CITY(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • FRANCESCA FAMBROUGH, et al  vs.  CITY OF REDWOOD CITY(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • FRANCESCA FAMBROUGH, et al  vs.  CITY OF REDWOOD CITY(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • FRANCESCA FAMBROUGH, et al  vs.  CITY OF REDWOOD CITY(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
						
                                

Preview

I ' I FMATEO L ECOUNTY D ‘ SAN ' MAR 2 4' 2021 . By ClerkomW DEPUTY GIERK ' SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO » FRANCESCA FAMBROUGH, et a1., ' ‘ \ Civil No. 17CIV05387 Plaintiffs, ‘ ' Assigned for All Purposes to vs. ‘ , Hon. Marie S. Weiner, Dept. 2 . ' REDWOOD CITY, CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER #21 Defendant}. ALLISON MADDEN; WILLIAM MICHAEL FLEMING; EDWARD STANCIL; JEDRICK HUMPHRIES ; ALBA LUCIA DIAZ; JONATHAN REID; TINA REID; and JOHN CHAMBERS, 2 Plaiptiffs in InterQenion, VS. ' CITY 0F REDWOOD CITY, Defendant. / On March 23, 2021, a Case Management Conference. was held in Department 2 of i this Court before the Honorable Marie S. Weiner. .Karen Frostrom of Thorsnes Bartolotfa ‘ I 1, McGuire LLP appeared on behalf of all Plaintiffg in Intervention except Madden; Maxwell Blum of Burke Williams & Sorensen LLP appeared en behalf-of Defendant - ' Redwood City; and Alison Madden appeared of herself as an Intervenor on‘behalf Plaintiff. ‘Counsel indicated that they uvere willing to participate in mediation, and will set - up a mediation session. ~ Plaintiff Madden indicated her intention to le a inotion for leave to amend her complaint in i‘nteentioh, and a motion to consolidate her unlawful detainer action 18UDL00816. The parties and the Court discussed and agreed upon a brieng schedule. The Court the following. rulings at the Conference, which are set forth made ‘ i herein as the formal. order of the Court. 1T Is HEREBY oRDERED as fonows: _ 1.‘ On or before March‘2‘9, 2021, Madden shall leand serve her Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint in Intervention. Any opposition shall be filed and served on 1 or before April 12, 2021. Any reply shall be led and served on or before April 20, 2021'. Hearing on the motion‘is set for Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. in Department 2 of this Court. Appearances shall b'enremote only using Zoom. 2. On or before March 29, 2021, Madden shall le and serve her Motion to V Consolidate. [As a reminder, any motion to consolidate must be led and served on both actions sought to be consolidated] Any opposition shall be led and served on or before . April 12, 2021. Any reply. shall be led and served on or before April 20, 2021. Hearing on the motion is set for Tuesday, April 27, 2021‘ at 2:00 p.m. in Department 2 i of this Court. Appearances shall be remote only using Zoom. 3., A Case Management Conferénce is set for Tuesday, April 27, 2021 a‘t 2:00 psm. in‘Department 2 of1§his Court, located at 400 County Center, Courtroom 2E, Redwood City, California. Appearances shali be remote only, via Zoom. Zoom ' credentials are on the Court’s website on the welJpage for Department 2. 3. . 4. In anticipation of‘ the Case Management Conference, counsel for the V ' the hearing and le written case management parties ishould be prepared to discuss at conference. statements (in prose an'd details, not using the standardized Judicial Council form) with a courtesy copy delivered'direétly to hepartment 2 on or before April 20, 2021, as to the following: t a. Status of Discovery, including completion of merits discovery, and schedule for expert discovery; V b. _ Status of Settlement orMediation, 1 c. Any anticipated motions and proposed brieng schedule;- V d. Setting of next CMC date; and l e. Any other matters for which the parties seek Court ruling or scheduling. i DATED: March 24, 2021 V HON. MARIE S. WEINER JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT SERVICE LIST As of May 2020 MICHELLE MARCHETTA KENYON KEVIN SIEGEL ALBERT TONG MAXWELL BLUM BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSON LLP 1901 Harrison Street, Suite 900 Oakland, CA 94612-3501 ’ (510) 273-3501 mkenyon@bwslaw.com ksiegengbwslaw.com < atong@bwslaw.com mblum@bswlaw.com VINCENT BARTOLOTTA JR; KAREN FROSTROM THORSNES BARTOLOTTA MCGUIRE LLP 2550 Fifth Avenue, 11th Floor San Diego, CA 92103 . (619) 236-9363 frostrom@tbmlawvers.com ALISON MADDEN P.O. Box 620650 Woodside, CA 94062 (920) 602-6685 alisonfnadden@yahoo.com