arrow left
arrow right
  • FRANCESCA FAMBROUGH, et al  vs.  CITY OF REDWOOD CITY(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • FRANCESCA FAMBROUGH, et al  vs.  CITY OF REDWOOD CITY(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • FRANCESCA FAMBROUGH, et al  vs.  CITY OF REDWOOD CITY(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • FRANCESCA FAMBROUGH, et al  vs.  CITY OF REDWOOD CITY(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • FRANCESCA FAMBROUGH, et al  vs.  CITY OF REDWOOD CITY(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • FRANCESCA FAMBROUGH, et al  vs.  CITY OF REDWOOD CITY(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
						
                                

Preview

- SAN FILED MATEO COUNTY JUN 23 2021 BY SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO . FRANCESCA FAMBROUGH, et a1., V Civil No. 17CIV053 87 Plaintiffs, 5 Assigned for All Purposes to ' ' - ' vs. V _ Hon. Marie S. Weiner, Dept. 2 REDWOOD CITY, - CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER #24 Defendant. ALLISON MADDEN; WILLIAM MICHAEL FLEMING; EDWARD STANCIL; JEDRICK HUMPHRIES; ALBA LUCIA DIAZ; JONATHAN REID; TINA REID; and JOHN .. CHAMBERS, Plaintiffs in Intervention, vs. CITY OF REDWOOD CITY, Defendant. On April 27, 2021, hearing on Madden’s Motion for Leave to Amend her Complaint in Intervention in Department 2 of this Court before the Honorable Marie S. Weiner. Karen Frostrom of Thorsnes Bartolofta McGuire LLP appeared on behalf of all Plainti‘s in Intervention except Madden; Maxwell Blum of Burke Williams & Sorensen LLP appeared on behalf of Defendant Redwood City; and Alison Madden appeared on behalf of herself as an Intervenor Plaintiff. Upon due ConsideratiOn of the briefs and evidence presented, including judicial notice of the lings on and rulings in the related actions of‘17CIVO468O and record 17CIV04898, and the oral argument of counsel and the parties, and having taken the matter under submission, IT IS HEREB-Y ORDERED as follows: Madden’s MotiOn for leave to le a First Amended Complaint in Intervention to add a cause of action for ViolatiOn ofthe Constitutional Due Process Clause and violation of Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.v Section 1983 is DENIED. Requests for Judicial Notice \ are GRANTED. I DATED: June23,2021 HON. MARIE s. W'EINER JUDGE 0F THE SUPERIOR COURT SERVICE LIST As of May 2020 MICHELLE MARCHETTA KENYON KEVIN SIEGEL ALBERT TONG MAXWELL BLUM BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSON ‘LLP ' 1901 Harrison Street, Suite 900 A Oakland, CA 94612-3501 (510) 273-3501 mkenyon@bwslaw.com v ksiegel@bwslaw.com atorigngwslawconi mblum@bsw1aw.com VINCENT BARTOLOTTA JR. KAREN FROSTROM THORSNES BARTOLOTTA MCGUIRE LLP , 2550 Fifth Avenue, 11th Floor San Diego, CA 92103 (619) 236793 63 frostrom@tbmlawvers.com ALISON MADDEN P.O. Box 620650 Woodside, CA 94062 .(920) 602-6685 alisonmadden@vahoo.com