arrow left
arrow right
  • FRANCESCA FAMBROUGH, et al  vs.  CITY OF REDWOOD CITY(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • FRANCESCA FAMBROUGH, et al  vs.  CITY OF REDWOOD CITY(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • FRANCESCA FAMBROUGH, et al  vs.  CITY OF REDWOOD CITY(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • FRANCESCA FAMBROUGH, et al  vs.  CITY OF REDWOOD CITY(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • FRANCESCA FAMBROUGH, et al  vs.  CITY OF REDWOOD CITY(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • FRANCESCA FAMBROUGH, et al  vs.  CITY OF REDWOOD CITY(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • FRANCESCA FAMBROUGH, et al  vs.  CITY OF REDWOOD CITY(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • FRANCESCA FAMBROUGH, et al  vs.  CITY OF REDWOOD CITY(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
						
                                

Preview

8/2/2021 *1 CYSXU\\U Marchetta Michelle CQbSXUddQ Kenyon AU^i_^ #H7D *+02/2$ (SBN 127969) ;&]QY\3 E-mail: ][U^i_^5Rgc\Qg'S_] mkenyon@bwslaw.com +2 AUfY^ D. Kevin 9' HYUWU\ #H7D*2-010$ Siegel (SBN194787) QbbYc_^ Harrison HdbUUd% HeYdU 2)) Street, Suite 900 /6 EQ[\Q^T% CA Oakland, 86 2-/*+&,.)* 94612-3501 IU\3 Tel: .*)'+0,'101) 510.273.8780 ; THE HI6I; STATE OF E< CALIFORNIA 86B?% CHRIS 8>G?H 8QcU No. Case D_' *08?K).,10 17CIV05387 I6K;DD;G% TAVENNER, NINA D?D6 PESCHCKE-KOEDT, F;H8>8A;&AE;9I% *, 13 ;C?B?E 9?6O% DAN EMILIO DIAZ, 96D HB6DA;G% SLANKER, DAWN 96LD Assignedfor for All Purposes to: HB6DA;G% SLANKER, BRENDA7G;D96 HC?I>%SMITH, I>JCF;G THUMPER >_^_bQR\U Marie Honorable CQbYU H' LUY^Ub% Dept. S. Weiner, 9U`d' 2+ *- 14 HC?I>% SMITH, 12*/3+%2*.- RE: STIPULATION 0($ VESSEL 4(11(+ *. 15 F\QY^dYVV% Plaintiff, *-1/('2*.-1 INSPECTIONS */ 16 f' v. 6SdY_^ Filed: Action 6;B JCF>G?;H% ALBA HUMPHRIES, 6B76 LUCIA BJ8?6 DIAZ, 9?6O% @ED6I>6D JONATHAN REID, G;?9% I?D6 G;?9% AND TINA REID, 6D9 +* 21 @E>D 8>6C7;GH% JOHN CHAMBERS, ++ 22 F\QY^dYVV&?^dUbfU^_bc% Plaintiff-Intervenors, +, 23 f' v. +- 24 8?IN OF CITY E< REDWOOD G;9LEE9 CITY, 8?IN% +. 25 9UVU^TQ^d' Defendant. +/ 26 IE TO I>; 67EK; ;DI?IB;9 THE ABOVE ENTITLED COURT: 8EJGI3 +0 27 ?I ?H HEREBY IT IS >;G;7N HI?FJB6I;9 STIPULATED BY 7N AND 6D9 BETWEEN 7;IL;;D the dXU signatory cYW^Qd_bi Plaintiffs F\QY^dYVVc and Q^T the dXU +1 28 -& 1 * -& % 2/)' # ! WILLIAMS BURKE, 3 (**( $+0 ! & "! 0 - /', 0', # ! LLP SORENSEN, ATTORNEYS **.! $ 1 1- / , '4 0 ! AT $ 1! LAW *$3! HI?FJB6I?ED STIPULATION RE G; VESSEL K;HH;B VALUATIONS K6BJ6I?EDH AND 6D9 DAMAGES 96C6=;H CLAIMS 8B6?CH - $ )*$ , & ! OAKLAND *1 cYW^Qd_bi Plaintiff-Intervenors signatory F\QY^dYVV&?^dUbfU^_bc below, RU\_g% on_^ the dXU one _^U hand, XQ^T% and Q^T Defendant 9UVU^TQ^d CITY 8?IN OF E< REDWOOD G;9LEE9 +2 8?IN% by CITY, Ri and Q^T through dXb_eWX its Ydc counsel S_e^cU\ of_V record, bUS_bT% on _^ the dXU other, _dXUb% the dXU V_\\_gY^W #k1C<@D=6Cl$3 following ("Stipulation"): ,3 5)(0(%1% these WHEREAS, dXUcU "Whereas" kLXUbUQcl Recital GUSYdQ\ clauses S\QecUc shall cXQ\\ be RU WYfU^ Ve\\ legal given full \UWQ\ UVVUSd effect Y^ dXU in the - 4 S_^cdbeSdY_^(Y^dUb`bUdQdY_^ of construction/interpretation _V this dXYc HdY`e\QdY_^4 Q^T Stipulation; and .5 5)(0(%1% the WHEREAS, dXU represented bU`bUcU^dUT signatory cYW^Qd_bi Plaintiffs F\QY^dYVVc and Q^T Plaintiff-Intervenors F\QY^dYVV&?^dUbfU^_bc to d_ this dXYc * /6 HdY`e\QdY_^ #k2&, /=6<>C<;;Bl Stipulation ("TBM Plaintiffs") $ and Q^T Ms. Cc' Madden, CQTTU^% in Y^ pro pro per Qc aQ Plaintiff-Intervenor per as F\QY^dYVV&?^dUbfU^_b (all#Q\\ 07 d_WUdXUb XUbUY^ together k/=6<>C<;;B# *>C9AE9>?ABl$% herein "Plaintiffs/ Intervenors"), XQfUhave VY\UT% Q^T(_b intervened filed, and/or Y^dUbfU^UT in,Y^% aQ Complaint 8_]`\QY^d alleging Q\\UWY^W 18 S\QY]c and/or claims Q^T(_b SQecUc causes of_V action QSdY_^ against QWQY^cd Defendant 9UVU^TQ^d City 8Ydi of _V Redwood GUTg__T City8Ydi ("Redwood #k098F??8 'B@97CBl$4 and Q^T *0 17 cYW^Qd_bi I7C 5)(0(%1% signatory WHEREAS, F\QY^dYVVc and TBM Plaintiffs Q^T Ms. Cc' Madden CQTTU^ object _RZUSd to d_ such ceSX Inspections; ?^c`USdY_^c4 and Q^T *1 18 5)(0(%1% all WHEREAS, Q\\ Plaintiffs/Intervenors, F\QY^dYVVc(?^dUbfU^_bc% on _^ the dXU one _^U hand, XQ^T% and Q^T Redwood GUTg__T City,8Ydi% on _^ the dXU other, _dXUb% *2 19 ]QY^dQY^ different maintain TYVVUbU^d positions `_cYdY_^c bUc`USdY^W dXU metrics respecting the ]UdbYSc V_b fQ\eQdY_^ of for valuation _V "relocation kbU\_SQdY_^ benefit RU^UVYd payments" `Qi]U^dcl +) 20 e^TUb CRAL, under 8G6B% and/or Q^T(_b just Zecd and/or Q^T(_b due TeU compensation S_]`U^cQdY_^ undere^TUb Y^fUbcU inverse S_^TU]^QdY_^4 condemnation; and Q^T +* 21 5)(0(%1% the WHEREAS, dXU signatory cYW^Qd_bi I7C F\QY^dYVVc and TBM Plaintiffs Q^T Ms. Cc' Madden CQTTU^ take dQ[U the dXU position `_cYdY_^ that dXQd the dXU ++ 22 fQ\eU of value _V any Q^i given WYfU^ vessel fUccU\ "as kQc aQ vessel", fUccU\l% and Q^T Ydc fQ\eQdY_^ Y^ its valuation dXU marketplace in the ]Qb[Ud`\QSU "askQc aQ vessel" fUccU\l Yc ^_d is not +, 23 dXU determinative the TUdUb]Y^QdYfU VQSd_b factor bUc`USdY^W `Qi]U^d of respecting payment _V relocation bU\_SQdY_^ benefit RU^UVYd payments `Qi]U^dc under e^TUb CRAL, 8G6B% ^_b dXU nor the +- 24 QSdeQ\ "just" actual kZecdl or _b TeU S_]`U^cQdY_^ under due compensation e^TUb Y^fUbcU inverse S_^TU]^QdY_^% condemnation, and Q^T is, Yc% bQdXUb% Q^ element rather, an U\U]U^d +. 25 bUS_fUbQR\U in recoverable Y^ addition QTTYdY_^ to d_ relocation bU\_SQdY_^ benefit RU^UVYd payments `Qi]U^dc as Qc property `b_`Ubdi not ^_d SQ`QR\U capable of_V being RUY^W moved ]_fUT to d_ +/ 26 aQ new ^Ug location; \_SQdY_^4 and Q^T +0 27 * 1 EdXUb than Other dXQ^ Ms. Cc' Madden, CQTTU^% thedXU Plaintiffs F\QY^dYVVc and Q^T Plaintiff-Intervenors F\QY^dYVV&?^dUbfU^_bc areQbU bU`bUcU^dUT represented byRi the dXU \Qg law VYb] firm +1 28 IX_bc^Uc 7Qbd_\_ddQ McGuire Thorsnes Bartolotta CS=eYbU BBF'LLP. % 2/)' # ! WILLIAMS BURKE, 3 (**( $+0 ! & "! 0 - /', 0', # ! LLP SORENSEN, **.! -& 2+ -& ATTORNEYS $ 1 1- / , '4 0 ! AT $ 1! LAW *$3! - $ )*$ , & ! OAKLAND HI?FJB6I?ED STIPULATION RE G; VESSEL K;HH;B VALUATIONS K6BJ6I?EDH AND 6D9 DAMAGES 96C6=;H CLAIMS 8B6?CH *1 5)(0(%1% Redwood WHEREAS, GUTg__T City8Ydi Yc e^SUbdQY^ how is uncertain X_g Plaintiffs/Intervenors F\QY^dYVVc(?^dUbfU^_bc intend Y^dU^T to d_ SQ\Se\QdU calculate +2 gXQd they what dXUi S\QY] d_ be claim to RU owed _gUT and Q^T thus dXec needs ^UUTc to d_ protect `b_dUSd Ydc bYWXdc to its rights d_ conduct S_^TeSd discovery TYcS_fUbi tod_ assess QccUcc ,3 dXUcU S\QY]c4 these Q^T claims; and - 4 5)(0(%1" Redwood WHEREAS, GUTg__T City8Ydi TYcQWbUUc gYdX Plaintiffs/Intervenors disagrees with F\QY^dYVVc(?^dUbfU^_bc S_^SUb^Y^W concerning howX_g the dXU .5 fUccU\c at vessels Qd issue YcceU should cX_e\T beRU valued fQ\eUT and/or Q^T(_b appraised, Q``bQYcUT% and Q^T contends S_^dU^Tc that dXQd the dXU vessels fUccU\c should cX_e\T beRU treated dbUQdUT /6 Qc personal as `Ubc_^Q\ property `b_`Ubdi for V_b aQ number ^e]RUb of _V reasons bUQc_^c that dXQd are QbU unnecessary e^^USUccQbi to d_ recite bUSYdU Y^ dXYc stipulation; in this cdY`e\QdY_^4 and Q^T 07 5)(0(%1% counsel WHEREAS, S_e^cU\ V_b GUTg__T City for Redwood 8Ydi met ]Ud and Q^T conferred S_^VUbbUT with gYdX I7C F\QY^dYVVcm S_e^cU\% TBM Plaintiffs' counsel, 18 Q^T with and gYdX Ms. Cc' Madden, CQTTU^% both R_dX during TebY^W the dXU Case 8QcU Management CQ^QWU]U^d Conference 8_^VUbU^SU heldXU\T March CQbSX 23,+,% 2021 +)+* 29 #k','l$% and ("CMC"), Q^T thereafter dXUbUQVdUb byRi U]QY\% email, S_^SUb^Y^W dXYc HdY`e\QdY_^% concerning this gYdX the Stipulation, with dXU CMC 8C8 discussion TYcSeccY_^ as Qc the dXU *) 10 WeYTU and guide Q^T bUVUbU^SU4 Q^T reference; and ** 11 5)(0(%1% the WHEREAS, dXU parties `QbdYUc execute UhUSedU this dXYc HdY`e\QdY_^ Stipulation tod_ avoid Qf_YT the dXU ?^c`USdY_^c Inspections of_V the dXU signatory cYW^Qd_bi *+ 12 F\QY^dYVVcm vessels, Plaintiffs' fUccU\c% *, 13 DEL% I>;G;;G;7N @E?DIBN JOINTLY HI?FJB6I;9% STIPULATED, AND 6D9 AGREED: 6=G;;93 *- 14 *' 1. DUYdXUb signatory Neither cYW^Qd_bi Plaintiffs, F\QY^dYVVc% nor ^_b Ms. Cc' Madden, CQTTU^% willgY\\ advance QTfQ^SU an Q^ argument QbWe]U^d that dXQd any Q^i *. 15 Y^dUbY_b improvement interior Y]`b_fU]U^d to d_ their dXUYb vessel(s) fUccU\#c$ is Yc relevant bU\UfQ^d to d_ the dXU proper `b_`Ub valuation fQ\eQdY_^ of_V their dXUYb vessels, fUccU\c% where gXUbU */ 16 Q^i such any ceSX interior Y^dUbY_b improvement Y]`b_fU]U^d has XQc not ^_d already Q\bUQTi been RUU^ T_Se]U^dUT documented Y^3 #Q$ past in: (a) `Qcd appraisals Q``bQYcQ\c S_^TeSdUT conducted *0 17 Ri Redwood by GUTg__T City's 8Ydimc appraiser; Q``bQYcUb4 or_b (b) #R$ the dXU summary ce]]Qbi prepared `bU`QbUT of_V Overland EfUb\Q^T Pacific FQSYVYS and Q^T Cutler's 8ed\Ubmc @e\i July *1 18 **% 2017 11, +)*0 interior Y^dUbY_b inspection Y^c`USdY_^ of_V Ms. Cc' Madden's CQTTU^mc vessel; fUccU\4 or _b (c) #S$ Y^ in aQ valuation fQ\eQdY_^ bU`_bd _b appraisal report or Q``bQYcQ\ *2 19 S_]`\UdUT on completed _^ any Q^i signatory cYW^Qd_bi Plaintiffs' F\QY^dYVVcm or _b Madden's CQTTU^mc behalf RUXQ\V prior `bY_b to d_ @Q^eQbi January 1,*% 2019 +)*2 that dXQd was gQc +) 20 `bUfY_ec\i provided previously `b_fYTUT to d_ the dXU City 8Ydi and/or Q^T(_b OPC EF8 Y^ dXU Docktown in the 9_S[d_g^ PlanF\Q^ process `b_SUcc asQc provided `b_fYTUT V_b dXUbUY^% for therein, +* 21 Q^T where and gXUbU that dXQd valuation fQ\eQdY_^ report bU`_bd or _b appraisal Q``bQYcQ\ report bU`_bd Y^S\eTUc `X_d_WbQ`Xc that includes photographs dXQd TU`YSd dXU interior depict the Y^dUbY_b ++ 22 Y]`b_fU]U^d at improvement Qd issue YcceU and Q^T TYcSeccUc dXU Y^dUbY_b discusses the Y]`b_fU]U^d as interior improvement Qc relevant bU\UfQ^d tod_ the dXU vessel's fUccU\mc valuation. fQ\eQdY_^' +, 23 <_b clarity, For S\QbYdi% any Q^i photographs `X_d_WbQ`Xc submitted ceR]YddUT inY^ TYcS_fUbi discovery Y^ dXYc Action, in this 6SdY_^% provided `b_fYTUT such ceSX photograph(s) `X_d_WbQ`X#c$ +- 24 `bU&TQdU @Q^eQbi pre-date January 1,*% 2019, +)*2% shall cXQ\\ satisfy cQdYcVi shall cXQ\\ be RU proof `b__V of _V (c) #S$ and Q^T permitted `Ub]YddUT tod_ supplement ce``\U]U^d (a) #Q$ or _b (b). #R$' +. 25 +' 2. C_bU_fUb% no Moreover, ^_ signatory cYW^Qd_bi Plaintiff, F\QY^dYVV% nor ^_b Madden, CQTTU^% will gY\\ advance QTfQ^SU anQ^ argument QbWe]U^d that dXQd the dXU +/ 26 SQ\Se\QdY_^ of calculation _V relocation bU\_SQdY_^ benefit RU^UVYd payments `Qi]U^dc they dXUi allege Q\\UWU Redwood GUTg__T City8Ydi owes _gUc them dXU] e^TUb 8G6B% or under CRAL, _b +0 27 Qc compensation as S_]`U^cQdY_^ V_b Y^fUbcU condemnation, for inverse S_^TU]^QdY_^% Yc TU`U^TU^d on is dependent _^ the dXU nature ^QdebU or _b quality aeQ\Ydi of _V any Q^i Y^dUbY_b interior +1 28 Y]`b_fU]U^d#c$ to improvement(s) d_ their dXUYb vessels fUccU\c not ^_d falling VQ\\Y^W within gYdXY^ 1(a)-(c) *#Q$&#S$ above.