Preview
8/2/2021
*1 CYSXU\\U Marchetta
Michelle CQbSXUddQ Kenyon
AU^i_^ #H7D *+02/2$
(SBN 127969)
;&]QY\3
E-mail: ][U^i_^5Rgc\Qg'S_]
mkenyon@bwslaw.com
+2 AUfY^ D.
Kevin 9' HYUWU\ #H7D*2-010$
Siegel (SBN194787) QbbYc_^
Harrison HdbUUd% HeYdU 2))
Street, Suite 900
/6 EQ[\Q^T% CA
Oakland, 86 2-/*+&,.)*
94612-3501
IU\3
Tel: .*)'+0,'101)
510.273.8780 ;
THE HI6I;
STATE OF E< CALIFORNIA
86B?% CHRIS 8>G?H 8QcU No.
Case D_' *08?K).,10
17CIV05387
I6K;DD;G%
TAVENNER, NINA D?D6 PESCHCKE-KOEDT,
F;H8>8A;&AE;9I%
*,
13 ;C?B?E 9?6O% DAN
EMILIO DIAZ, 96D HB6DA;G%
SLANKER, DAWN 96LD Assignedfor for All Purposes to:
HB6DA;G%
SLANKER, BRENDA7G;D96 HC?I>%SMITH, I>JCF;G
THUMPER >_^_bQR\U Marie
Honorable CQbYU H' LUY^Ub% Dept.
S. Weiner, 9U`d' 2+
*-
14 HC?I>%
SMITH,
12*/3+%2*.- RE:
STIPULATION 0($ VESSEL
4(11(+
*.
15 F\QY^dYVV%
Plaintiff, *-1/('2*.-1
INSPECTIONS
*/
16 f'
v. 6SdY_^ Filed:
Action 6;B
JCF>G?;H% ALBA
HUMPHRIES, 6B76 LUCIA
BJ8?6 DIAZ,
9?6O%
@ED6I>6D
JONATHAN REID, G;?9% I?D6 G;?9% AND
TINA REID, 6D9
+*
21 @E>D 8>6C7;GH%
JOHN CHAMBERS,
++
22 F\QY^dYVV&?^dUbfU^_bc%
Plaintiff-Intervenors,
+,
23 f'
v.
+-
24 8?IN OF
CITY E< REDWOOD
G;9LEE9 CITY, 8?IN%
+.
25 9UVU^TQ^d'
Defendant.
+/
26 IE
TO I>; 67EK; ;DI?IB;9
THE ABOVE ENTITLED COURT: 8EJGI3
+0
27 ?I ?H HEREBY
IT IS >;G;7N HI?FJB6I;9
STIPULATED BY 7N AND
6D9 BETWEEN
7;IL;;D the dXU signatory
cYW^Qd_bi Plaintiffs
F\QY^dYVVc and
Q^T the
dXU
+1
28
-& 1
* -&
% 2/)' # ! WILLIAMS
BURKE, 3 (**( $+0 ! &
"!
0 - /', 0', # ! LLP
SORENSEN,
ATTORNEYS
**.!
$ 1 1- / , '4 0 ! AT
$ 1! LAW
*$3!
HI?FJB6I?ED
STIPULATION RE G; VESSEL
K;HH;B VALUATIONS
K6BJ6I?EDH AND 6D9 DAMAGES
96C6=;H CLAIMS 8B6?CH
- $ )*$ , & !
OAKLAND
*1 cYW^Qd_bi Plaintiff-Intervenors
signatory F\QY^dYVV&?^dUbfU^_bc below,
RU\_g% on_^ the
dXU one
_^U hand,
XQ^T% and
Q^T Defendant
9UVU^TQ^d CITY
8?IN OF E< REDWOOD
G;9LEE9
+2 8?IN% by
CITY, Ri and
Q^T through
dXb_eWX its
Ydc counsel
S_e^cU\ of_V record,
bUS_bT% on
_^ the
dXU other,
_dXUb% the
dXU V_\\_gY^W #k1C<@D=6Cl$3
following ("Stipulation"):
,3 5)(0(%1% these
WHEREAS, dXUcU "Whereas"
kLXUbUQcl Recital
GUSYdQ\ clauses
S\QecUc shall
cXQ\\ be
RU WYfU^ Ve\\ legal
given full \UWQ\ UVVUSd
effect Y^ dXU
in the
-
4 S_^cdbeSdY_^(Y^dUb`bUdQdY_^ of
construction/interpretation _V this
dXYc HdY`e\QdY_^4 Q^T
Stipulation; and
.5 5)(0(%1% the
WHEREAS, dXU represented
bU`bUcU^dUT signatory
cYW^Qd_bi Plaintiffs
F\QY^dYVVc and
Q^T Plaintiff-Intervenors
F\QY^dYVV&?^dUbfU^_bc to d_ this
dXYc
*
/6 HdY`e\QdY_^ #k2&, /=6<>C<;;Bl
Stipulation ("TBM Plaintiffs") $ and
Q^T Ms.
Cc' Madden,
CQTTU^% in Y^ pro
pro per Qc aQ Plaintiff-Intervenor
per as F\QY^dYVV&?^dUbfU^_b (all#Q\\
07 d_WUdXUb XUbUY^
together k/=6<>C<;;B# *>C9AE9>?ABl$%
herein "Plaintiffs/ Intervenors"), XQfUhave VY\UT% Q^T(_b intervened
filed, and/or Y^dUbfU^UT in,Y^% aQ Complaint
8_]`\QY^d alleging
Q\\UWY^W
18 S\QY]c and/or
claims Q^T(_b SQecUc
causes of_V action
QSdY_^ against
QWQY^cd Defendant
9UVU^TQ^d City
8Ydi of
_V Redwood
GUTg__T City8Ydi ("Redwood
#k098F??8 'B@97CBl$4 and Q^T
*0
17 cYW^Qd_bi I7C
5)(0(%1% signatory
WHEREAS, F\QY^dYVVc and
TBM Plaintiffs Q^T Ms.
Cc' Madden
CQTTU^ object
_RZUSd to
d_ such
ceSX Inspections;
?^c`USdY_^c4 and
Q^T
*1
18 5)(0(%1% all
WHEREAS, Q\\ Plaintiffs/Intervenors,
F\QY^dYVVc(?^dUbfU^_bc% on _^ the
dXU one
_^U hand,
XQ^T% and
Q^T Redwood
GUTg__T City,8Ydi% on
_^ the
dXU other,
_dXUb%
*2
19 ]QY^dQY^ different
maintain TYVVUbU^d positions
`_cYdY_^c bUc`USdY^W dXU metrics
respecting the ]UdbYSc V_b fQ\eQdY_^ of
for valuation _V "relocation
kbU\_SQdY_^ benefit
RU^UVYd payments"
`Qi]U^dcl
+)
20 e^TUb CRAL,
under 8G6B% and/or
Q^T(_b just
Zecd and/or
Q^T(_b due
TeU compensation
S_]`U^cQdY_^ undere^TUb Y^fUbcU
inverse S_^TU]^QdY_^4
condemnation; and Q^T
+*
21 5)(0(%1% the
WHEREAS, dXU signatory
cYW^Qd_bi I7C F\QY^dYVVc and
TBM Plaintiffs Q^T Ms.
Cc' Madden
CQTTU^ take
dQ[U the
dXU position
`_cYdY_^ that
dXQd the
dXU
++
22 fQ\eU of
value _V any
Q^i given
WYfU^ vessel
fUccU\ "as
kQc aQ vessel",
fUccU\l% and
Q^T Ydc fQ\eQdY_^ Y^
its valuation dXU marketplace
in the ]Qb[Ud`\QSU "askQc aQ vessel"
fUccU\l Yc ^_d
is not
+,
23 dXU determinative
the TUdUb]Y^QdYfU VQSd_b
factor bUc`USdY^W `Qi]U^d of
respecting payment _V relocation
bU\_SQdY_^ benefit
RU^UVYd payments
`Qi]U^dc under
e^TUb CRAL,
8G6B% ^_b dXU
nor the
+-
24 QSdeQ\ "just"
actual kZecdl or
_b TeU S_]`U^cQdY_^ under
due compensation e^TUb Y^fUbcU
inverse S_^TU]^QdY_^%
condemnation, and Q^T is,
Yc% bQdXUb% Q^ element
rather, an U\U]U^d
+.
25 bUS_fUbQR\U in
recoverable Y^ addition
QTTYdY_^ to
d_ relocation
bU\_SQdY_^ benefit
RU^UVYd payments
`Qi]U^dc as Qc property
`b_`Ubdi not
^_d SQ`QR\U
capable of_V being
RUY^W moved
]_fUT to d_
+/
26 aQ new
^Ug location;
\_SQdY_^4 and
Q^T
+0
27
*
1 EdXUb than
Other dXQ^ Ms.
Cc' Madden,
CQTTU^% thedXU Plaintiffs
F\QY^dYVVc and
Q^T Plaintiff-Intervenors
F\QY^dYVV&?^dUbfU^_bc areQbU bU`bUcU^dUT
represented byRi the
dXU \Qg
law VYb]
firm
+1
28 IX_bc^Uc 7Qbd_\_ddQ McGuire
Thorsnes Bartolotta CS=eYbU BBF'LLP.
% 2/)' # ! WILLIAMS
BURKE, 3 (**( $+0 ! &
"!
0 - /', 0', # ! LLP
SORENSEN, **.! -& 2+ -&
ATTORNEYS
$ 1 1- / , '4 0 ! AT
$ 1! LAW
*$3!
- $ )*$ , & !
OAKLAND
HI?FJB6I?ED
STIPULATION RE G; VESSEL
K;HH;B VALUATIONS
K6BJ6I?EDH AND 6D9 DAMAGES
96C6=;H CLAIMS 8B6?CH
*1 5)(0(%1% Redwood
WHEREAS, GUTg__T City8Ydi Yc e^SUbdQY^ how
is uncertain X_g Plaintiffs/Intervenors
F\QY^dYVVc(?^dUbfU^_bc intend
Y^dU^T to
d_ SQ\Se\QdU
calculate
+2 gXQd they
what dXUi S\QY] d_ be
claim to RU owed
_gUT and
Q^T thus
dXec needs
^UUTc to
d_ protect
`b_dUSd Ydc bYWXdc to
its rights d_ conduct
S_^TeSd discovery
TYcS_fUbi tod_ assess
QccUcc
,3 dXUcU S\QY]c4
these Q^T
claims; and
-
4 5)(0(%1" Redwood
WHEREAS, GUTg__T City8Ydi TYcQWbUUc gYdX Plaintiffs/Intervenors
disagrees with F\QY^dYVVc(?^dUbfU^_bc S_^SUb^Y^W
concerning howX_g the
dXU
.5 fUccU\c at
vessels Qd issue
YcceU should
cX_e\T beRU valued
fQ\eUT and/or
Q^T(_b appraised,
Q``bQYcUT% and
Q^T contends
S_^dU^Tc that
dXQd the
dXU vessels
fUccU\c should
cX_e\T beRU treated
dbUQdUT
/6 Qc personal
as `Ubc_^Q\ property
`b_`Ubdi for
V_b aQ number
^e]RUb of _V reasons
bUQc_^c that
dXQd are
QbU unnecessary
e^^USUccQbi to d_ recite
bUSYdU Y^ dXYc stipulation;
in this cdY`e\QdY_^4 and
Q^T
07 5)(0(%1% counsel
WHEREAS, S_e^cU\ V_b GUTg__T City
for Redwood 8Ydi met
]Ud and
Q^T conferred
S_^VUbbUT with
gYdX I7C F\QY^dYVVcm S_e^cU\%
TBM Plaintiffs' counsel,
18 Q^T with
and gYdX Ms.
Cc' Madden,
CQTTU^% both
R_dX during
TebY^W the
dXU Case
8QcU Management
CQ^QWU]U^d Conference
8_^VUbU^SU heldXU\T March
CQbSX 23,+,% 2021
+)+*
29 #k','l$% and
("CMC"), Q^T thereafter
dXUbUQVdUb byRi U]QY\%
email, S_^SUb^Y^W dXYc HdY`e\QdY_^%
concerning this gYdX the
Stipulation, with dXU CMC
8C8 discussion
TYcSeccY_^ as Qc the
dXU
*)
10 WeYTU and
guide Q^T bUVUbU^SU4 Q^T
reference; and
**
11 5)(0(%1% the
WHEREAS, dXU parties
`QbdYUc execute
UhUSedU this
dXYc HdY`e\QdY_^
Stipulation tod_ avoid
Qf_YT the
dXU ?^c`USdY_^c
Inspections of_V the
dXU signatory
cYW^Qd_bi
*+
12 F\QY^dYVVcm vessels,
Plaintiffs' fUccU\c%
*,
13 DEL% I>;G;;G;7N @E?DIBN
JOINTLY HI?FJB6I;9%
STIPULATED, AND 6D9 AGREED:
6=G;;93
*-
14 *'
1. DUYdXUb signatory
Neither cYW^Qd_bi Plaintiffs,
F\QY^dYVVc% nor
^_b Ms.
Cc' Madden,
CQTTU^% willgY\\ advance
QTfQ^SU an Q^ argument
QbWe]U^d that
dXQd any
Q^i
*.
15 Y^dUbY_b improvement
interior Y]`b_fU]U^d to d_ their
dXUYb vessel(s)
fUccU\#c$ is
Yc relevant
bU\UfQ^d to
d_ the
dXU proper
`b_`Ub valuation
fQ\eQdY_^ of_V their
dXUYb vessels,
fUccU\c% where
gXUbU
*/
16 Q^i such
any ceSX interior
Y^dUbY_b improvement
Y]`b_fU]U^d has XQc not
^_d already
Q\bUQTi been
RUU^ T_Se]U^dUT
documented Y^3 #Q$ past
in: (a) `Qcd appraisals
Q``bQYcQ\c S_^TeSdUT
conducted
*0
17 Ri Redwood
by GUTg__T City's
8Ydimc appraiser;
Q``bQYcUb4 or_b (b)
#R$ the
dXU summary
ce]]Qbi prepared
`bU`QbUT of_V Overland
EfUb\Q^T Pacific
FQSYVYS and
Q^T Cutler's
8ed\Ubmc @e\i
July
*1
18 **% 2017
11, +)*0 interior
Y^dUbY_b inspection
Y^c`USdY_^ of_V Ms.
Cc' Madden's
CQTTU^mc vessel;
fUccU\4 or
_b (c)
#S$ Y^
in aQ valuation
fQ\eQdY_^ bU`_bd _b appraisal
report or Q``bQYcQ\
*2
19 S_]`\UdUT on
completed _^ any
Q^i signatory
cYW^Qd_bi Plaintiffs'
F\QY^dYVVcm or
_b Madden's
CQTTU^mc behalf
RUXQ\V prior
`bY_b to
d_ @Q^eQbi
January 1,*% 2019
+)*2 that
dXQd was
gQc
+)
20 `bUfY_ec\i provided
previously `b_fYTUT to d_ the
dXU City
8Ydi and/or
Q^T(_b OPC
EF8 Y^ dXU Docktown
in the 9_S[d_g^ PlanF\Q^ process
`b_SUcc asQc provided
`b_fYTUT V_b dXUbUY^%
for therein,
+*
21 Q^T where
and gXUbU that
dXQd valuation
fQ\eQdY_^ report
bU`_bd or
_b appraisal
Q``bQYcQ\ report
bU`_bd Y^S\eTUc `X_d_WbQ`Xc that
includes photographs dXQd TU`YSd dXU interior
depict the Y^dUbY_b
++
22 Y]`b_fU]U^d at
improvement Qd issue
YcceU and
Q^T TYcSeccUc dXU Y^dUbY_b
discusses the Y]`b_fU]U^d as
interior improvement Qc relevant
bU\UfQ^d tod_ the
dXU vessel's
fUccU\mc valuation.
fQ\eQdY_^'
+,
23 <_b clarity,
For S\QbYdi% any
Q^i photographs
`X_d_WbQ`Xc submitted
ceR]YddUT inY^ TYcS_fUbi
discovery Y^ dXYc Action,
in this 6SdY_^% provided
`b_fYTUT such
ceSX photograph(s)
`X_d_WbQ`X#c$
+-
24 `bU&TQdU @Q^eQbi
pre-date January 1,*% 2019,
+)*2% shall
cXQ\\ satisfy
cQdYcVi shall
cXQ\\ be
RU proof
`b__V of
_V (c)
#S$ and
Q^T permitted
`Ub]YddUT tod_ supplement
ce``\U]U^d (a) #Q$ or
_b (b).
#R$'
+.
25 +'
2. C_bU_fUb% no
Moreover, ^_ signatory
cYW^Qd_bi Plaintiff,
F\QY^dYVV% nor
^_b Madden,
CQTTU^% will
gY\\ advance
QTfQ^SU anQ^ argument
QbWe]U^d that
dXQd the
dXU
+/
26 SQ\Se\QdY_^ of
calculation _V relocation
bU\_SQdY_^ benefit
RU^UVYd payments
`Qi]U^dc they
dXUi allege
Q\\UWU Redwood
GUTg__T City8Ydi owes
_gUc them
dXU] e^TUb 8G6B% or
under CRAL, _b
+0
27 Qc compensation
as S_]`U^cQdY_^ V_b Y^fUbcU condemnation,
for inverse S_^TU]^QdY_^% Yc TU`U^TU^d on
is dependent _^ the
dXU nature
^QdebU or
_b quality
aeQ\Ydi of
_V any
Q^i Y^dUbY_b
interior
+1
28 Y]`b_fU]U^d#c$ to
improvement(s) d_ their
dXUYb vessels
fUccU\c not
^_d falling
VQ\\Y^W within
gYdXY^ 1(a)-(c)
*#Q$S$ above.