arrow left
arrow right
  • Ryan VS Ferreira Civil Unlimited (Other Personal Injury/Propert...) document preview
  • Ryan VS Ferreira Civil Unlimited (Other Personal Injury/Propert...) document preview
  • Ryan VS Ferreira Civil Unlimited (Other Personal Injury/Propert...) document preview
  • Ryan VS Ferreira Civil Unlimited (Other Personal Injury/Propert...) document preview
  • Ryan VS Ferreira Civil Unlimited (Other Personal Injury/Propert...) document preview
  • Ryan VS Ferreira Civil Unlimited (Other Personal Injury/Propert...) document preview
  • Ryan VS Ferreira Civil Unlimited (Other Personal Injury/Propert...) document preview
  • Ryan VS Ferreira Civil Unlimited (Other Personal Injury/Propert...) document preview
						
                                

Preview

a_ (22791580 Cascenes ). 266382 -ABREGO FILED ALAMEDA COUNTY AUG 2 6 2019 CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT By {D KURT RHODES THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA JNTY OF ALAMEDA Case No.: RG19016925 UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ASSIGNED TO FOR ALL PURPOSES THE HONORABLE ROBERT MCGUINESS DEPT: 22 RT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT | GIBSON, CARLOS FERREIRA, AND KURT ymplaint of Plaintiff on file herein admit, deny and I f the California Code of Civil Procedure, these if the allegations of said Complaint, and the whole [TO COMPLAINT - 1 3 in any sum or sums alleged, or in any other sum or at Il yn file herein, and the whole thereof, these answering ny injury, damages or loss, if any, by reason of any act rir agents or employees. FFIRMATIVE DEFENSES FIRMATIVE DEFENSE ative Fault of Plaintiff) t, the Plaintiffs conduct and actions were so careless, :in some degree to the alleged incident and to the 1 sustained by said Plaintiff and therefore said e alternative, it reduces the rights of recovery by that int as set forth under the doctrine of comparative FFIRMATIVE DEFENSE ‘ence of Third Parties) herein as to these answering Defendants in that any 1ed by the Plaintiff herein would be the direct and nd/or unlawful conduct of independent third parties, or ission on the part of answering Defendants or their (MATIVE DEFENSE ate Cause of Action) [O COMPLAINT -2 ‘d causes of action fails to state facts sufficient to ng Defendants. RMATIVE DEFENSE Mitigate Damages) 2 care and diligence to mitigate any damages sustained | , any damages awarded to Plaintiff shall be limited to laintiff mitigated her Senne. MATIVE DEFENSE of Limitations) 1 stated in the complaint is barred by the provisions of e of Civil Procedure. MATIVE DEFENSE ‘Setoff) tled to a setoff for any monies paid to Plaintiff as an [RMATIVE DEFENSE tption of Risk) int, the Plaintiff, knowing the probable consequences nger, freely and voluntarily participated in all the the risks attendant thereto. RMATIVE DEFENSE ‘laintiff's complaint, Plaintiff was aware of and il as she did, and despite this knowledge, Plaintiff and assumed all risks, including that of being bitten. "OCOMPLAINT -3 ‘MATIVE DEFENSE fPs complaint, Plaintiff was not lawfully on the very under Civil Code §3342. Plaintiff was neither lations, nor was she on the property by invitation of the (MATIVE DEFENSE ey ever, own the dog mentioned/described in Plaintiffs y IRMATIVE DEFENSE 1 Plaintiff's complaint, Defendants did not know, and molest, or bother people, or that it had a mischievous, IRMATIVE DEFENSE ed Defenses) -esently have insufficient knowledge or information ay have additional, as yet unstated, affirmative ie right to answer additional affirmative defenses in the | AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE affirmative defense to the complaint on file herein, it is it the time of the accident described in the complaint, nployment with these answering defendants. Therefore, and the Worker’s Compensation Appeals Board have ‘OCOMPLAINT -4 iff's claims and as a result the complaint is barred with intiff takes nothing by reason of her Complaint and that dsts. lOTICE answer, neither these Defendants nor their counsel dmissibility of the following statement (or the existence} requests that this statement be redacted as may be ring Defendants. rtsuyker, Stratman & Williams-Abrego are employees > Farmers Insurance Group of Companies, and not a IARTSUYKER, STRATMAN & WILLIAMS- ABREGO A OO. CHK WALTER J. MCMATH III, ESQ. Attorney for Defendants, STEPHEN GIBSON, CARLOS FERREIRA, AND