arrow left
arrow right
  • FRANCESCA FAMBROUGH, et al  vs.  CITY OF REDWOOD CITY(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • FRANCESCA FAMBROUGH, et al  vs.  CITY OF REDWOOD CITY(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • FRANCESCA FAMBROUGH, et al  vs.  CITY OF REDWOOD CITY(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • FRANCESCA FAMBROUGH, et al  vs.  CITY OF REDWOOD CITY(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • FRANCESCA FAMBROUGH, et al  vs.  CITY OF REDWOOD CITY(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • FRANCESCA FAMBROUGH, et al  vs.  CITY OF REDWOOD CITY(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
						
                                

Preview

CM-0‘1 5 ATTORNEYon Fruity WITHOUT ATl’OFlNEY (Name. State Bar number, and address): Fon ~counT USE ONLY Karen R. Frostrom, Esq. SBN: 20704_4 —THORSNES BARTOLOTTA MCGUIRE LLP 2550 Fifth Avenue, Eleventh Floor San Diego, CA 92103 . F I L ECOUNVt? E TELEPHONE N0.: 619-236-9363 FAX NO. (Optional): 619-236-9653 SAN MATEO ‘E-MAILADDRESS(OpfionaU: NOV 2 8 2017 3 An'ORf‘EV ”WNW”: Plaintiffs, Francesca Eambrough, et al. _ I _ SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO STREET ADDRESS:400 County Center MAIL'ING County Center ADDRESS:400 fi/%. CITY AND ZIP cooE:Redwood City, 94063 BRANCH NAMEzsouthcm Branch: Hall of Justiceand Records .. . , . » .. _ . ' ' " ‘ " cAsE‘NUMeER: ' PLAINTlFF/PETITIONERzFrancesca Fambrough, et al. l7CIV053 87 , ‘ DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:Redwood City JUDICIALVOFFICER: ........... w DEPT“: NOTICE'OF RELATED CASE Identity, in chronological order according to date of filing, all cases related to the case referenced above. . BY PM 1. a. TitleISan Francisco Bay Marinas for All, Inc. v. City of Redwood City, City Council of the City of Redwood City and Does 1-15, et 3.1. b. Case number: 17CIV00276 c. Court: same as above [:l other state or federal court.(name and address): d. Departmentz e. Case type: [:3 limited civil unlimited. civil [:1 probate Cl family law [:l other (specify): f. Filing d'ateilanuarv 19. 2017 9. Has this case been designated or determined as “complex?" Yes Cl No h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply): [E involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents. or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. D involves claims against. title to, possession of, or damages to the same property. E] is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by differentjudges. [:1 Additional explanation is attached in attachment 1h 17—- (”V—05387 NORC . Status ofcase: Notice of Related Case pending [:l dismissed E] with 1:] without prejudice [:l disposed of by judgment ii iii lllllllllllllllllllll 2- 3- Title: San Francisco Bay Marinas for All, Inc. v. City of Redwood City, Citizens for Public Trust, Ted J. Hannig and Docs 1-20 b. Case number;17cwoo316 c. Court: same as above [:1 other state or federal court (name and address): d. Departmentzz ' Peg“ all Form Approved lot Optional Use Cal. Judicial Council at California NOTICE OF RELATED CASE Rulemitxki’rlt'i‘l’eciggg CM-OI5 (Rev. July 1. 2007] - Westlaw Doc 8: Form Bullder- , ONE-015 case NUMBER: __ PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:Francesca Famsrq'ugme; a1, DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:Redwood City 17CIV05387 2‘. (continued) e. Case type: [:3 limited civil Unlimitedctvil [:3 probate I:E family law {:3 other (speCify): f. g. F" Filing daterJanuarv 23, 20.17 Has this case been designatedor determined as “complex?" [:1 Relationship of this case to the case referenced abOVe (Check all. that apply): Yes - No involves 'the' same parties and is based on the same or similarclaims. arises from the same or:substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determinatiOn of the same or substantially identical questions of law orifact. [:3 involVes claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property. [:3 is likely -for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources it heard by different judges, :3 Additional explanation is attached in attachment 2h l. Status oiCase: {Ell pending {:3 dismissed :3 with [:3 without prejudice C} disposed of. by judgment. -3. a. TitleiFrancesca Fambrouah. eta]. v; Redwood Citv~ p- Case “umberlZCIV04680 O. Court: same as above . [:3 other state or ”federal court (name and address): d. Departmentzq e. Case type: [:3 limited civil -. unlimited civil [:3 probate [:1 family law [:3 other‘(specify): f. 9. h. Filing dateIOctober '12. 2017 Has this case been designatedxor determined as "complex?“ Relationship of thiscase to‘the-case referenced above (check all that apply): involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar‘claims. [1:] Yes - No arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. [:3 involves claims against, title to,-possession of, or damages to‘ the same property. [:1 is .likelyr‘for-other reasons'to require substantial duplicationof judicial resources it heard by diEferentjudges. [:1 Additional explanation is attached in attachment an i. Status of case: pending [:3 dismissed [:3 With [:3 without prejudice I {:3 disposed oi‘by judgment 4. Additional related cases are described in Attachment 4. Number of pages attached: 1 DatBI'November 27. 2017 Karen R. ‘Frostrom, Esq. b M’— (TYPE OR PRlNT NAME OF'PARTY OR ATTORNEY) I (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATT¢RNEY) CM-0l5 [Rem July [2007] Page 2 013 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE CM—015 . PLAINTIFF/PETITIONERiFr'ancesca Fambrough. et al- “55 ”UMBER: ' DEFENDANT/RESPONdENTéCIIy of Redwood City, 17CIV053 87 PROOF OF SERVICE av FIRST-CLASS MAIL NOTICE OF RELATED CASE (NOTE: You Cannot serve the Notice of Related Case it you are a party in the action. The person who served the notice must- complete this proof of service. The notice must be served on all known parties in each related action or proceeding.) 1. lam at least 18 years old and note pa‘r‘tyto this action; amareslderirt of;or‘ employed in the county where the mailing took | place, and my residence or business address is (specify): 2550 Fifih Avenue, Eleventh Floor, San Diego, CA 92103 ‘a copy of the Notice of Related Case 2. l sen/ed by enclOsing it me sealed envelope with’first—class poetage fully a- prepaid and (check one): i: b. deposited the sealed envelope with the United States Postal Service. placed the s’ealed envelope for collection and prodessing for mailing, following this business's USUaI practices with which I am readily familiar On the same day correspondence'Is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited'In the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal service. '3. The Notice of‘Re/ated Case was mailed: a. on (da‘te)-'November‘28. 2017‘ b. from (cityand state): Sa’nDiego, CA 4. The ant/slope Was addressed and mailed as follows: a. Name of person sen/ed: 0. Name of person Served: Alison Madden, In Pro Per TedJ. Hannig, Hannig Law LLP Street address‘iRO. Box 620650 Street address: 990 Industrial Road, Suite 207 City:.Redwood City City: San Carlos State-and zipacode:CA 94063 State and ”zip code:C'A 94070 b. Name of person served: _ ' , d. Name of person served. MIChellc M'archetta Kenyon / Kevin 'D. Siegel Veronica Ramirez, City Attorney? Mary Eleonor Ignacio, Asst City Attorney Street address: 1901 Harrison Street, Suite .900 Street address: 1017 Middiefield Road CityEOaklan‘d City: Redwood City State-and zip code: CA 94612-3501 State and zip code1CA 94063 C: Names and addresses of additional persons served are attached. (Youmay usetorm POS-O.30(P).) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of~CaIitornia that the foregoingzis true and correct. DateiNOA/ernber 28. 2017 (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF DECLARANT) ”(SIGNAVURE OF DECLARANT) ' ' CM-‘OISlRev. July 1.2007) Pageaota NOTICE OF RELATED CASE