Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
“A temporary restraining order may be granted if there are allegations of irreparable injury and there is no adequate remedy at law.” (In re Dissolution of Esquire (1984) 136 Mich. App. 492, 495 citing Barkau v. Ruggirello (1980) 100 Mich. App. 617.)
Mich. Ct. R. 3.310(C) covers the form and scope of injunctions and for an order granting an injunction or restraining order, this rule requires that the motion:
(Mich. Ct. R. 3.310(C).)
“A trial court has discretion to vacate or modify a previously entered temporary restraining order.” (Bowers v. Vandermeulen-Bowers (2008) 278 Mich. App. 287, 295 citing MCR 2.604(A).) “A trial court abuses its discretion when it selects an outcome that is not within the range of reasonable and principled outcomes.” (Id.)
“An injunction or temporary restraining order may not be granted in one action to stay proceedings in another action pending in another court if the relief requested could be sought in the other pending action.” (Marsh v. Foremost Ins Co. (1996) 451 Mich. 62, 69 n.12.)
“The standard for the entry of a temporary restraining order is quite low: the probate court could enter the order if it ‘clearly appear[ed]’ that [the movant] would suffer ‘irreparable injury, loss, or damage.’” (Carter v. Asplund (In re Asplund), No. 349388, at *5 [Mich. Ct. App. Nov. 24, 2020] citing MCR 3.310(B)(1)(a).)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.