Plaintiff seeks a multitude of non-monetary sanctions, including issue, evidence, and terminating sanctions against Defendants Eastridge Shopping Center LLC and Township Retail Services, (“Defendants”), initially for allegedly refusing to produce a videotape of the location where Plaintiff fell, and then after it was produced, based on an allegation that the videotape has been altered leading to prejudice to her. Plaintiff argues that Defendants tried to “hide” the evidence in question. After it was produced a year ago, Plaintiff have since claimed that the videotape has been altered, because the videotape is “in slow motion” and there appear to be gaps which Plaintiff claims is evidence the videotape has been altered.
As Defendants have stated, the videotape was found in the possession of a third party security vendor and was produced a year ago. Defendants have since responded to all discovery related to the videotape. Most notably, Plaintiff does not claim that any portion of the v
Hearing Date
February 14, 2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Plaintiff seeks a multitude of non-monetary sanctions, including issue, evidence, and terminating sanctions against Defendants Eastridge Shopping Center LLC and Township Retail Services, (“Defendants”), initially for allegedly refusing to produce a videotape of the location where Plaintiff fell, and then after it was produced, based on an allegation that the videotape has been altered leading to prejudice to her. Plaintiff argues that Defendants tried to “hide” the evidence in question. After it was produced a year ago, Plaintiff have since claimed that the videotape has been altered, because the videotape is “in slow motion” and there appear to be gaps which Plaintiff claims is evidence the videotape has been altered.
As Defendants have stated, the videotape was found in the possession of a third party security vendor and was produced a year ago. Defendants have since responded to all discovery related to the videotape. Most notably, Plaintiff does not claim that any portion of the v