Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
DEPARTMENT 17
616 DILLON (LA) LLC vs. EDWIN’S PLUMBING CO.
Case No.: 20STCV11766
Hearing Date: March 25, 2021
The Court identified the following deficiencies in Plaintiff’s default judgment packet:
· Exhibit D corroborates that a payment of $120,098.00 total was made by Owner. However, the Court asks for clarification as to whether there was any work by Defendant that did not require correction. If so, Plaintiff is asked to clarify whether $120,098.00 represents only those payments made to either correct defective work or complete unfinished work, or if this total sum encompasses payments for work by Defendant that did not need to be corrected. If it is the latter, Plaintiff is asked to clarify why Plaintiff is entitled to recover those costs as well, given that those costs were incurred, and anticipated, within the scope of the original contract.
· Plaintiff must submit evidence to corroborate the expenses for: the stickers an
Hearing Date
March 26, 2021
Type
Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
DEPARTMENT 17
616 DILLON (LA) LLC vs. EDWIN’S PLUMBING CO.
Case No.: 20STCV11766
Hearing Date: March 25, 2021
The Court identified the following deficiencies in Plaintiff’s default judgment packet:
· Exhibit D corroborates that a payment of $120,098.00 total was made by Owner. However, the Court asks for clarification as to whether there was any work by Defendant that did not require correction. If so, Plaintiff is asked to clarify whether $120,098.00 represents only those payments made to either correct defective work or complete unfinished work, or if this total sum encompasses payments for work by Defendant that did not need to be corrected. If it is the latter, Plaintiff is asked to clarify why Plaintiff is entitled to recover those costs as well, given that those costs were incurred, and anticipated, within the scope of the original contract.
· Plaintiff must submit evidence to corroborate the expenses for: the stickers an