Tentative ruling issued by Judge Walter SCHWARM on Jun. 04, 2019 in Orange County, CA - Case no: xxxxxCJC

Case Name:   Alcazar v. Peters

Case No.:   (Subscribe to View)

On June 4, 2019, Judge Walter SCHWARM of Orange County Superior Court, Department C19, issued the following tentative ruling.

The Reference Case No.: (Subscribe to View) Orange County, California. Hearing Date 06.04.2019.

View Case Records and Case History

Download Ruling Print Ruling

Defendant’s (Laboratory Express, Inc. dba Lab Express) Motion for Summary Judgment (Motion), filed on 3-18-19, is DENIED.
To the extent Defendant’s Objections to Declaration for Frank Walter Peters, filed on 5-30-19) do not comply with California Rules of Court, rule 3.1354, the court OVERRULES all of Defendant’s objections. Additionally, as described below, the court OVERRULES Defendant’s objections as immaterial to the court’s decision. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (q).) The court does not consider the Declaration of Jeffrey M. David in Support of Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment. (Jay v. Mahaffey (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 1522, 1537-1538.) It appears that Defendant/Cross-Complainant Frank Walter Peters used his “Responses to Defendant, Lab Expresses Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts,” to filed on 5-21-19, as objections. The court OVERRULES these objections because they do not comply with California Rules of Court, rule 3.1354.
Code of….....

Related Topics

What Are Independent Contractors vs. Employees?

Case Info

Judge

Walter SCHWARM

Case No.

(Subscribe to View)

Hearing Date

June 4, 2019

County

Orange County, CA

Department

C19

Docket Filing date

August 23, 2017

Category

Civil

Parties

  • Call & Jensen (Attorney for the Defendant)

  • Frank Walter Peters (Cross - Complainant)

  • Frank Walter Peters (Defendant)

  • IDEXX Distribution, Inc. (Defendant)

  • IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. (Defendant)

  • IDEXX Veterinary Services,… (Defendant)

  • Jackson Lewis P.C. (Attorney for the Defendant)

  • Jackson Lewis P.C. (Attorney for the Defendant)

  • Jackson Lewis P.C. (Attorney for the Defendant)

  • Josefina Alcazar (Appellant)

  • Josefina Alcazar (Plaintiff)

  • Kinkle, Rodiger and Spriggs (Attorney for the Defendant)

  • Kinkle, Rodiger and Spriggs (Attorney)

  • Laboratory Express, Inc. (Defendant)

  • Law Offices of Timothy J S… (Attorney for the Appellant)

  • Law Offices of Timothy J S… (Attorney for the Appellant)

  • Law Offices of Timothy J S… (Attorney for the Plaintiff)

  • Law Offices of Timothy J S… (Attorney for the Plaintiff)

  • Ledezma Law Group (Attorney for the Appellant)

  • Ledezma Law Group (Attorney for the Appellant)

  • Ledezma Law Group (Attorney for the Plaintiff)

  • Ledezma Law Group (Attorney for the Plaintiff)

  • MUNOZ AND ASSOCIATES (Attorney for the Appellant)

  • MUNOZ AND ASSOCIATES (Attorney for the Appellant)

  • MUNOZ AND ASSOCIATES (Attorney for the Plaintiff)

  • MUNOZ AND ASSOCIATES (Attorney for the Plaintiff)

  • Maria G. Alcazar (Appellant)

  • Maria G. Alcazar (Plaintiff)

Other rulings in case

Other rulings by Hon. Walter SCHWARM

Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope
Cancel