Tentative ruling issued by Judge Daniel S. Murphy on Apr. 12, 2017 in Los Angeles County, CA - Case no: xxxxx618

KRUBIM 26 INTERNATIONAL INC., Plaintiff, v. GOLDEN COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et al., Defendants.
Case No.: BC555618
Hearing Date: April 12, 2017
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE:PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT



The court may allow, in furtherance of justice, and “upon any terms as may be just, an amendment to any pleading or proceeding in other particulars....” (CCP § 473.) “[D]iscretion should be exercised liberally in favor of amendments, for judicial policy favors resolution of all disputed matters in the same lawsuit.” (Kittredge Sports Co. v. Sup. Ct. (1989) 213 Cal. App. 3d 1045, 1047.) “If the motion to amend is timely made and the granting of the motion will not prejudice the opposing party, it is error to refuse permission to amend.” (Morgan v. Superior Court of Cal. In and For Los Angeles County (1959) 172 Cal. App. 2d 527, 530.) A motion to amend a pleading before trial must be accompanied by a separate declaration that must s….....