CU0001293    Minta Stovall vs. WMPD LLC, et al.
Plaintiff’s request for a Preliminary Injunction is granted. 
Evidentiary Objections
Plaintiff’s objections to the Mapes Declaration are sustained as follows:  objection nos. 1-10 (lack of foundation), and objection nos. 12-18 (lack of foundation and hearsay).  All other objections are overruled. 
Plaintiff’s objections to the Maes Declaration are sustained as follows: objection no. 2 (insofar as the declarant states he had no “notice, actual or constructive” - vague and ambiguous, lack of foundation, improper conclusion), objection no. 5 (The first four sentences subject to objection starting with “In 2019, I was approached by David Pettis … in Grass Valley, California,” and ending with “In exchange, any funds … toward  purchase of these properties.” - hearsay), objection no. 7 (hearsay, lack of foundation).  All other objections are overruled. 
Merits of Request
            White v. Davis (2003) 30 Cal.4th 528, summarizes the applicable