MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
TANGER VS PALFINGER
RIC2001612 ON COMPLAINT OF CHARLES
LIFTGATES LLC
TANGER
Tentative Ruling:
The Court denies Morgan’s motion for summary judgment.
The Court grants Morgan’s motion for summary adjudication as to the breach of warranty
claim, but denies the remainder of the motion for summary adjudication.
Factual/Procedural Context
This is a personal injury action brought by Charles Tanger (“Charles”) and Phyllis
Tanger (“Phyllis”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) against defendants Palfinger Liftgates, LLC and
Los Angeles Truck Centers, LLC. Defendant Morgan Corporation (“Morgan”) was added
as Defendant Doe 1. Defendants Palfinger Tail Lifts GMBH and Palfinger USA, LLC were
added as Does 2 and 3, respectively. Defendant Palfinger North America was named as
Doe 4. Charles alleges that at 1627 South Hargrave Street in Banning on October 24,
2019, he was injured by an Interlif
Hearing Date
December 07, 2023
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
TANGER VS PALFINGER
RIC2001612 ON COMPLAINT OF CHARLES
LIFTGATES LLC
TANGER
Tentative Ruling:
The Court denies Morgan’s motion for summary judgment.
The Court grants Morgan’s motion for summary adjudication as to the breach of warranty
claim, but denies the remainder of the motion for summary adjudication.
Factual/Procedural Context
This is a personal injury action brought by Charles Tanger (“Charles”) and Phyllis
Tanger (“Phyllis”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) against defendants Palfinger Liftgates, LLC and
Los Angeles Truck Centers, LLC. Defendant Morgan Corporation (“Morgan”) was added
as Defendant Doe 1. Defendants Palfinger Tail Lifts GMBH and Palfinger USA, LLC were
added as Does 2 and 3, respectively. Defendant Palfinger North America was named as
Doe 4. Charles alleges that at 1627 South Hargrave Street in Banning on October 24,
2019, he was injured by an Interlif