Order: TOLBERTSON VS ASBESTOS CLAIMS MGMT CORP*

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                ITA

San Francisco Superior Courts
Information Technology Group

Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Feb-06-2002 4:51 pm

Case Number: CGC-00-314876
Filing Date: Feb-06-2002 4:50
Juke Box: 001 Image: 00357764
MINUTE ORDER RE:

TOLBERTSON VS ASBESTOS CLAIMS MGMT CORP*

001000357764

Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.D

San Francisco County Superior Court

FEB 06 2002
GORD! “LI, Cler!
Deputy Clerk
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
DEPARTMENT 302 LAW AND MOTION
MARLOWE G. TOLBERTSON, et. al., ) Case No.: 314876
)
Plaintiffs, )
) MINUTE ORDER DENYING
Vs. ) DEFENDANT GOLDEN GATE
) DRYWALL INC.’S MOTION FOR
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., et. al., } SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Defendants. }
)

The motion for summary judgment of defendant Golden Gate Drywall, Inc. came on
regularly for hearing on February 1, 2002, before the Honorable James J McBride. Sarah
Valentine, Esq. appeared on behalf of defendant and moving party; Erik C. Van Hespen, Esq.
appeared on behalf of plaintiffs. The Court took the matter under submission following the
hearing.

Having considered the moving and opposing papers, admissible exhibits, and the
arguments presented at the hearing, the court DENIES defendant’s motion. The court overrules

defendant’s objection to the Gray declaration and admits it into evidence. The Gray declaration

wees suo nll ANAL MT CUO tc ca

MINUTE ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT GOLDEN GATE DRYWALL INC.’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT -1-24

25

compound materials by defendant. Defendant failed to sustain its burden that joint compound
did not contain asbestos.

Prevailing party shall prepare an order pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure
section 437c(g) and in compliance with California Rules of Court, Rule 391.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

patep:_© / Lo a LA

C "adc James J. McBride

\ Od udge of the Superior Court

N

MINUTE ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT GOLDEN GATE DRYWALL INC.’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT -2-SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
DEPARTMENT 302 LAW AND MOTION
MARLOWE G. TOLBERTSON, et. al., Case No.: 314876

Plaintiffs,
Certificate of Service by Mail

vs. (CCP § 1013a(4))

A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., et. al.,

Defendants.

ee SSS SSS EL

I, Gordon Park-Li, Clerk of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco,
certify that:
1) Lam not a party to the within action;

2)On_gER GR 77 _, I served the attached:

MINUTE ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT GOLDEN GATE DRYWALL INC.’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

by placing a copy thereof in a sealed envelope, addressed to the following:

Erik C Van Hespen, Esq. Sarah Valentine, Esq.
Paul, Hanley & Harley Burnham Brown

4905 Central Avenue, Suite 200 P.O. Box 119

Richmond CA 94804 Oakland CA 94604-9968
and,

3) I then placed the sealed envelope in the outgoing mail at 400 McAllister St., San
Francisco, CA 94102 on the date indicated above for collection, attachment of required prepaid
postage, and mailing on that date following standard court practice.

BPR wy

DATED: By: GORDON PARK-LI, Clerk

WA ove.

Deputy

sovere AMEN AINUICCODTONDLNTCOLDEN CATE DUVWALLENC NOTION

CIIMMARY JITTDCMENT -3-