“The trial court is authorized to control and limit discovery.” (See Board, Healing Arts v. Spinden (1990) 798 S.W.2d 472, 478.)
“The court for cause shown may at any time in its discretion extend the length of such a time period with or without motion if a request is made before the specified response period has expired, and upon notice and motion made after the expiration of the specified period . . . where the failure to act was the result of excusable neglect[.]" (See Inman v. St. Paul Fire Marine Ins. Co. (2011) 347 S.W.3d 569, 576.)
“The statutes relating to discovery provide that interrogatories shall be fully answered within 15 days after service unless the court, on motion and notice and for good cause shown enlarges or shortens the time.” (See Central & Southern Truck Lines, Inc. v. Westfall GMC Truck, Inc. (1958) 317 S.W.2d 841, 847.)
“The trial court has discretion to grant a time extension for good cause.” (See Mello v. Giliberto (2002) 73 S.W.3d 669, 680.)
“Rule 74.04 provides the procedure for allowing additional time for discovery after the filing of summary judgment.” (See Southwestern Bell Yellow Pgs. v. Wilkins (1996) 920 S.W.2d 544, 551.)
“That rule gives the trial court discretion [f]or good cause shown to continue the motion for a reasonable time until the requested discovery is complete.” (See Southwestern Bell Yellow Pgs. v. Wilkins (1996) 920 S.W.2d 544, 551.)
“The propriety of discovery is within the trial court's discretion and will not be disturbed except for abuse of discretion.” (See Board, Healing Arts v. Spinden (1990) 798 S.W.2d 472, 478.)
It is well settled that “upon motion by a party or by the person from whom discovery is sought, and for good cause shown, the court may make any order which justice requires to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense.” (See Brown v. McIbs, Inc. (1986) 722 S.W.2d 337, 342.)
However, it is also well settled that “the rule contemplates that ‘good cause’ must be shown before the trial court may enter a protective order.” (See Brown v. McIbs, Inc. (1986) 722 S.W.2d 337, 342-43.)
10 pages
Electronically Filed - CITY OF ST. LOUIS - February 16, 2024 - 04:56 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS CITY, MISSOURI TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT RUBY FREEMAN and WANDREA ) MOSS, ) ) Plaintiffs,
St. Louis City, MO
Feb 16, 2024
CC Other Tort
2 pages
IN THE PROBATE DIVISION, CIRCUIT COURT, ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MISSOURI In the matter of FILED SCOTT ANTHONY PHINNEY No. 21SL-PR00934 01:34 PM 10/8/2021 Decedent
Feb 08, 2021
St. Louis County, MO
Oct 08, 2021
PR Miscellaneous Probate-Other
1 page
FILED 4/17/2020 CIRCUIT CLERK STE. GENEVIEVE COUNTY, MO
Ste. Genevieve County, MO
Apr 17, 2020
PR Guardian/Conserv - Adult
3 pages
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SULLIVAN COUNTY, MISSOURI PROBATE DIVISION In the Estate of DANNY HAROLD GANNON. Estate No. 17SU-PR00002 Deceased. Farmers Bank of Green City, Petitioner, y Rec 05 wis Robert H. Parrish, PROT LAN WO B3E06 Respondent. JUDGMENT Now on this 13 day of November, 2017, the Petitioner, Farmers Bank of Green City, appears by its attorney, Lauren A. Horsman; the Respondent, Robert H. Parrish, appears in person and by his attorney, Tara Walker, and the Personal Representati
Jan 20, 2017
Sullivan County, MO
Dec 05, 2017
PR Required Administration
MASON-WHITE, TRACEY A
1 page
Electronically Filed - Probate Independence - December 07, 2015 - 01:10 AM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI PROBATE DIVISION AT INDEPENDENCE IN THE ESTATE OF W
Jackson County, MO
Dec 15, 2015
PR Independent with Will
1 page
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY MARIBEL SANTA ANNA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) Case No. 1416-CV12936 ) Division 1 ) KURT SMITH, ) ) Defendant. ) JUDGMENT AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S LAWSUIT WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO RESPOND TO COURT’S DISCOVERY ORDER This case comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Lawsuit Without Prejudice for Failure to Respond to Court’s Discovery Order, filed herein on Octobe
2 pages
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY RICHARD SHORE, M.D., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 1316-CV18917 ) Division 6 THE CHILDREN’S MERCY HOSPITAL, ) etal, ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER/JUDGMENT Before the Court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The motion has been fully and well-briefed and is ripe for disposition. Having reviewed the briefing regarding the motion and being duly advised in the premises, the Court determines that there is no genuine issue as to a
Jul 26, 2013
1 page
13LW-PRO0132 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAWRENCE COUNTY, MISSOURI Probate Division at Mt. Vernon In The Estate Of: Barbara Lou Kronschnabel, Estate No. [3LW) PROO WSL Deceased. ORDER _TO OPEN AND INVENTORY SAFE DEPOSIT BOX Now on this IT aay of September, 2013, the Court takes up for consideration the Petition To Open And Inventory Safe Deposit Box filed hereby by Daniel Jerome Kronschnabel on behalf of the Estate of Barbara Lou Kronschnabel. The Court finds that granting said motion would
Sep 11, 2013
Lawrence County, MO
Sep 17, 2013
PR Miscellaneous Probate-Other
JONES, SAMUEL C
1 page
IN THE 39™ JUDICIAL CIRCUIT CIRCUIT COURT OF LAWRENCE COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI Probate Division /n the Estate of Case No.: 13LW-PROOOSO JIMMIE RAY WILKERSON, Deceased. ORDER TO OPEN AND INVENTORY SAFETY DEPOSIT BOX 5 hee NOW ON this_@O “day of May, 2013, the Court takes up for consideration the Petition To Open and Inventory Safety Deposit Box filed herein by John Cowherd, on behalf of JAMES WILKERSON. The Court finds that granting of said motion would be in the best interest of the es
Lawrence County, MO
May 20, 2013
JONES, SAMUEL C
2 pages
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISBOURL AT INDEPENDENCE i uF 2 JIMMY MARKLEY, et al., ageurt ee 10s we ' ~ Plaintiffs, BY 2 bee ( So DCA v. Case Number 1016-CV3315? CENTERPOINT MEDICAL CENTER OF Division 2 INDEPENDENCE, LLC, et al., Ww Defendants. ORDER AND JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL On October 19, 2011, Piaintiffs filed a Voluntery Dismissal With Prejudice. This concludes all issues pending before the Court in this matter. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECR ZED that Plaintiffs’ cause
Nov 01, 2010
Jackson County, MO
Oct 24, 2011
CC Pers Injury-Malpractice
3 pages
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE STEPHEN OLIVER, et al., ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ve ) Case No.: 0916-CV06023 ) Division 17 MAZDA NORTH AMERICAN j OPERATIONS, INC., ) Defendant. ) JUDGMENT On this date, the Court takes up the following motions and rules as follows: 1. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Reply, filed February 3, 2010. The motion is SUSTAINED. The Reply attached is deemed filed February 3, 2010. 2. The Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Def
Mar 02, 2009
2 pages
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE roy fed CLAUDIA GREENWOOD, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 2 0916-CV33968 ) ion 17 GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO, ) Defendant. ) JUDGMENT On this date, he Court takes up Defendant’s Motion for Enforzement of Discovery, filed February 4, 2010, Plaintiff's Suggestions :n Oppositicn, filed February 10, 2010, Defendant’s Reply in Support, filed February 16, 2010, and Plaintiff's Sur-Reply in Opposit on, filed February 16, 2010. Plaintiff
Nov 02, 2009
Jackson County, MO
Mar 08, 2010
CC Pers Injury-Vehicular
1 page
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE ANTHONY AMADOR, Plaintiff, Case No.: 0916-CV30728 Division 17 ve MISSOURI CVS PHARMACY, LLC, Defendant. JUDGMENT On this date, the Court takes up Defendant’s Motion for Enforcement of Discovery, filed January 14, 2010, and Plainti:f’s Reply, filed January 20, 201.0. The Certificete of Service filed January 20, 2010 shows that the discovery responses outstanding in the Motion to Enforce have teen made. Therefore, the motion i
Sep 30, 2009
Jackson County, MO
Feb 01, 2010
CC Pers Injury-Malpractice
1 page
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI ‘| | ~ AT INDEPENDENCE SHELLY OLSON, et al., ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ve ) Case No.: 0916-CV19164 ) Division 17 KANG TRUCKING, et al., ) Defendants. } JUDGMENT On this date, the Court takes up Plaintiffs’ Motion for Enforcement of Discovery, filed December 15, 2009, Defendants’ Suggestions in Opposition, filed December 24, 2009, and Plaintiffs’ Reply Suggestions in Support, filed December 30, 2009. The motion is SUSTAINED. Defendants shall produce th
Jun 18, 2009
1 page
Wwe IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE NORMAN RICE, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No.: 0816-CV30605 ) Division 17 ICC MANAGEMENT, INC., et al., ) Defendants. ) JUDGMENT On this date, the Court takes up Defendant ICC Management’s Motion to Enforce Discovery, filec July 21, 2009. Defense counsel has confirmed that the discovery has been produced. Therefore, the motion is DENIED as moot. SO ORDERED. U/6 | Ke < DATE ak RATE, Circuit Judge Copies faxed/mailed on il/
Oct 01, 2008
Jackson County, MO
Nov 03, 2009
CC Pers Injury-Other
1 page
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE DIANA CRETEN-MILLER, Plaintiff, Case No.: 0816-CV41312-01 Division 17 ve WESTLAKE ACE HARDWARE, INC., et al., Defendants. JUDGMENT. On this date, the Court takes up Plaintiff's Motion to Quash Notices of Deposition and Subpoenas and Motion for Protective Order and Suggestions in Support and Motion for Expedited Briefing and/or Hearing on this Matter, filed October 7, 2009. A Discovery Conference is set for October 27, 2009 a
Apr 16, 2009
Jackson County, MO
Oct 19, 2009
CC Employmnt Discrmntn 213.111
1 page
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE BRETT BALLARD, 1 Plaintiff, 1 1 v. ) Cas
May 06, 2009
Jackson County, MO
Jul 17, 2009
CC Pers Injury-Prod Liab
1 page
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI ' AT INDEPENDENCE MICHAEL HEGARTY, et al., 1 Plaintiffs, 1
Jul 24, 2008
1 page
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MARION COUNTY, MISSOURI DAHNA McCLELLAND DONALD McCLELLAND, Plaintiffs, vs. Case No.: 06MM-CV00057 RUSSELL KRUSE, Defendant. JUDGMENT NOW, on this Ibifdey of August, 2007, the Court having reviewed it’s Order of August 1, 2007, and the Court File notes that Plaintiff Donald McClelland has not responded to Defendant's discovery within ten (10) days as ordered by the Court and, accordingly, the Court enters Judgment in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff Donald M
Feb 28, 2006
Marion County, MO
Aug 16, 2007
CLAYTON, ROBERT M II
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
Your content views addon has successfully been added.
No Worries!
Adding your team is easy
in the "Manage Company Users" tab
