arrow left
arrow right
  • Hopkins, Susan et al vs Stabel, Ethan et al(22) Unlimited Auto document preview
  • Hopkins, Susan et al vs Stabel, Ethan et al(22) Unlimited Auto document preview
  • Hopkins, Susan et al vs Stabel, Ethan et al(22) Unlimited Auto document preview
  • Hopkins, Susan et al vs Stabel, Ethan et al(22) Unlimited Auto document preview
  • Hopkins, Susan et al vs Stabel, Ethan et al(22) Unlimited Auto document preview
  • Hopkins, Susan et al vs Stabel, Ethan et al(22) Unlimited Auto document preview
  • Hopkins, Susan et al vs Stabel, Ethan et al(22) Unlimited Auto document preview
  • Hopkins, Susan et al vs Stabel, Ethan et al(22) Unlimited Auto document preview
						
                                

Preview

Michael G. Jones SBN: 150836 LAW OFFICES OF SHAHIN KARIM 2520 Venture Oaks Way, Suite 140 Sacramento, CA 95833 916-925-3275 916-925-3234 mike.jones@usaa.com 9/9/2022 JENNER ETHAN STABEL BUTTE 312 North Spring Street 312 North Spring Street Chico, 95928 North Butte County Courthouse Susan Hopkins and Jason Hopkins Ethan Stabel and John Edward X 22CV00720 September 28, 2022 10:30 a.m. Judge Benson Civil X Michael G. Jones X Ethan Stabel and John Edward X MVA Susan Hopkins and Jason Hopkins 22CV00720 Ethan Stabel and John Edward Motor vehicle accident in Chico, CA involving three vehicles. Plaintiffs' allege injuries as a result. Discovery and Investigation continues. X X The following weeks are already set for trials:10/3/22; 11/1/22; 11/8/22; 12/19,2022; 1/17/2022;1/24 /23; 2/21/23; 3/20/23; 7/14/23; 9/11/23; 9/18/23; 9/26/23; 11/6/23 and 01/10/24. X 3-5 X X CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Susan Hopkins and Jason Hopkins CASE NUMBER: DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Ethan 22CV00720 Stabel and John Edward 10. C. Indicate the ADR process or processes that the party or parties are willing to participate in, have agreed to participate in, or have already participated in (check all that app/y and provide the spec/fled information): The party or parties completing Ifthe party or parties completing this form in the case have agreed to this form are willing to participate in or have already completed an ADR process or processes, participate in the following ADR indicate the status of the processes (attach a copy of the parties'ADR processes (check all that app/y).' stipulation): X Mediation session not yet scheduled Mediation session scheduled for (date): (1) Mediation III X Agreed to complete mediation by (date): Mediation completed on (date): X Settlement conference not yet scheduled (2) Settlement Settlement conference scheduled for(date).' X conference Agreed to complete settlement conference by(date).' Settlement conference completed on (date): Neutral evaluation not yet scheduled Neutral evaluation scheduled for (date): (3) Neutral evaluation Agreed to complete neutral evaluation by (date): Neutral evaluation completed on (date): Judicial arbitration not yet scheduled (4) Nonbinding judicial Judicial arbitration scheduled for (date): arbitration Agreed to complete judicial arbitration by(date): Judicial arbitration completed on (date): Private arbitration not yet scheduled (5) Binding private Private arbitration scheduled for(date): arbitration Agreed to complete private arbitration by (date): Private arbitration completed on (date): ADR session not yet scheduled ADR session scheduled for (date): (6) Other (specify): Agreed to complete ADR session by (date): ADR completed on (date): CM-110[Rev. September 1, 2021] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page3of5 CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Susan Hopkins and Jason Hopkins CASE NUMBER: DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Ethan Stabel and John Edward 22CV00720 11. Insurance a. X Insurance carrier, (name): USAA if any, for party filing this statement b. Reservation of rights: Yes X No c. Coverage issues will significantly affect resolution of this case (explain): 12. Jurisdiction Indicate any matters that may affect the court's jurisdiction or processing of this case and describe the status. Bankruptcy Other (specify).' Status: 13. Related cases, consolidation, and coordination a. There are companion, underlying, or related cases. (1) Name of case: (2) Name of court: (3) Case number: (4) Status: Additional cases are described in Attachment 13a. b. A motion to consolidate coordinate willbe filed by (name party).' 14. Bifurcation or coordinating the following issues or causes of The party or parties intend to file a motion for an order bifurcating, severing, action (specify moving party,type of motion, and reasons): 15. Other motions The party or parties expect to file the following motions before trial (specify moving party, type of motion,and issues): 16. Discovery a. The party or parties have completed all discovery. b. X The following discovery willbe completed by the date specified (describe all anticipated discovery): Party Description Date Defendant Plaintffs' deposition 9/13/22 Defendant Medical Subpoenas 9/2022 Defendant Expert Discovery Per Code c. The following discovery issues, including issues regarding the discovery of electronically stored information, are anticipated (specify): ""110"Septembermz" CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Fag" °f5 CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Susan Hopkins and Jason Hopkins CASE NUMBER: DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Ethan 22CV00720 Stabel and John Edward 17. Economic litigation a. This is a limited civil case (i.e., the amount demanded is $25,000 or less) and the economic litigation procedures inCode of CivilProcedure sections 90-98 will apply to this case. b. This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigation procedures or for additional discovery willbe filed(if checked,explain specifically Why economic litigation procedures relating to discovery or trial should not app/y to this case): 18. Other issues |:| matters be considered or determined at the case management The party or parties request that the following additional conference (specify).' 19. Meet and confer a. The party or parties have met and conferred with allparties on all subjects required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court (if not, explain): b. After meeting and conferring as required by rule 3.724 ofthe California Rules of Court, the parties agree on the following (Specify): 20. Totalnumber of pages attached (if any).' am completely familiar with this case and willbe fully prepared to discuss the status of discovery and alternative dispute resolution, fl | as well as other issues raised by this statement, and will possess the authority to enter into stipulations on these issues at the time of the case management conference, including the written authority of the party where required. @749 Date: September 9, 2022 Michael G. Jones (TYPE OR PRlNT NAME) ' PARTKR ATTORNEY) (SIGNATURE OF (TYPE OR PRlNT NAME) I (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) Additional signatures are attached. CM-110 [Rev. September 1, Page of5 2021] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT 5 PROOF OF SERVICE [1013(a)(1)&(3) CCP (Rev.1/98)] Hopkins v Stabel Superior Court, Butte County, Case Number: 22CV00720 I, the undersigned, declare that: I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the within action. I am employed in the County of Sacramento, State of California, where the within mailing or other method of service occurs, and my business address is 2520 Venture Oaks Way, Suite 140, Sacramento, California. On the date listed below, I served the foregoing document described as DEFENDANTS’ CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT on the interested parties listed below: William L. Brelsford, Esq. Brelsford Androvich and White 2001 I Street Sacramento, California 95811 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, SUSAN HOPKINS and JASON HOPKINS Phone: 916-449-1300 Fax: 916-449-1320 E-SERVICE: I electronically served the document(s) described herein above to the addressee named above. Electronic service address of person served: wbrelsford@baw- attorneys.com, nfike@baw-attorneys.com. E-FILE: I electronically filed and served the document(s) herein above with the Clerk of the Court by using the e-filing system. Executed at Sacramento, California on September 9, 2022. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Patty Paniagua Electronically signed pursuant to Civil Code §1633.7(d) which states: “If the law requires a signature, an electronic signature satisfies the law."