arrow left
arrow right
  • JOHN NEAL DROOYAN VS DAVID KAZEMI Defamation (slander/libel) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JOHN NEAL DROOYAN VS DAVID KAZEMI Defamation (slander/libel) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

CM-015 A HORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT AHORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY John N. Drooyan I S.B.N. 238609 -Law Office of John Drooyan 461 West 6th Street, Ste. 202 San Pedro, California 90731 TELEPHONE NO.: (31 0) 309-9430 FAX NO. (Optional) : (310) 359-0245 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional} : jd@drooyanlaw.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name) : Plaintiff John Drooyan pro per SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles STREET ADDRESS: 111North Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles 90012 BRANCH NAME: Central - Stanley Mosk Courthouse CASE NUMBER: PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: John N. Drooyan 20STCV44254 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: David Kazemi JUDICIAL OFFICER: Honorable Richard J. Burdge DEPT.: NOTICE OF RELATED CASE 37 Identify, in chronological order according to date of filing, all cases related to the case referenced above. 1. a. Title: John N. Drooyan v. E.S.E. Electronics, Inc. and David Kazemi b. Case number: 18STCV00763 c. Court: 0 same as above D other state or federal court (name and address): d. Department: 36 Electronically Received 12/08/2020 08:04 AM e. Case type: D limited civi l 0 unlimited civil D probate D family law D other (specify): f. Filing date: 10/15/2018 g. Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" D Yes 0 No h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply): D involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar clc;~)ms . 0 arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. D involves claims against, title to , possession of, or damages to the same property . D is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges. D Additional explanation is attached in attachment 1h i. Status of case: 0 pend ing D dismissed D with D without prejudice D disposed of by judgment 2. a . Titl e: b. Case number: C. Court: D same as above D other state or federal court (name and address): d. Department: Page 1 of 3 Form Approved lor Optional Use Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.300 Judicial Council of California NOTICE OF RELATED CASE www.courtinfo.ca.gov CM -0151Rev. July 1, 2007]