arrow left
arrow right
  • In Re: Joseph S. Scully, Deceased:
Funda Talia Scully, Individ. and as Executor of the Estate, Plaintiff 
vs.
Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC, B. S., A Minor and B. S., A MinorAncillary - Probate  Independent Administration document preview
  • In Re: Joseph S. Scully, Deceased:
Funda Talia Scully, Individ. and as Executor of the Estate, Plaintiff 
vs.
Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC, B. S., A Minor and B. S., A MinorAncillary - Probate  Independent Administration document preview
  • In Re: Joseph S. Scully, Deceased:
Funda Talia Scully, Individ. and as Executor of the Estate, Plaintiff 
vs.
Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC, B. S., A Minor and B. S., A MinorAncillary - Probate  Independent Administration document preview
  • In Re: Joseph S. Scully, Deceased:
Funda Talia Scully, Individ. and as Executor of the Estate, Plaintiff 
vs.
Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC, B. S., A Minor and B. S., A MinorAncillary - Probate  Independent Administration document preview
  • In Re: Joseph S. Scully, Deceased:
Funda Talia Scully, Individ. and as Executor of the Estate, Plaintiff 
vs.
Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC, B. S., A Minor and B. S., A MinorAncillary - Probate  Independent Administration document preview
  • In Re: Joseph S. Scully, Deceased:
Funda Talia Scully, Individ. and as Executor of the Estate, Plaintiff 
vs.
Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC, B. S., A Minor and B. S., A MinorAncillary - Probate  Independent Administration document preview
  • In Re: Joseph S. Scully, Deceased:
Funda Talia Scully, Individ. and as Executor of the Estate, Plaintiff 
vs.
Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC, B. S., A Minor and B. S., A MinorAncillary - Probate  Independent Administration document preview
  • In Re: Joseph S. Scully, Deceased:
Funda Talia Scully, Individ. and as Executor of the Estate, Plaintiff 
vs.
Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC, B. S., A Minor and B. S., A MinorAncillary - Probate  Independent Administration document preview
						
                                

Preview

E-FILED TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 3/6/2020 1:09 PM Mary Louise Nicholson 2019-PR01975-2-A COUNTY CLERK BY: Paula Applegate CAUSE NO. 2019-PR01975-2 FUNDA TALIA SCULLY § IN THE PROBATE COURT INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTOR § OF THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH SCULLY § § § vs. § TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS § FIDELITY BROKERAGE SERVICES, § LLC AND BRIAN SCULLY, MINOR, § AND BROOKE SCULLLY, § A MINOR § NO. TWO PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL PETITION AND APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF ATTORNEY AD LITEM Funda Scully, individually and as Executor of the Estate of Joseph Scully (“Scully”) files this Original Petition and Application for the Appointment of an Attorney Ad Litem against Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC (“Fidelity”) and Brian Scully, a minor, and Brooke Scully, a minor, as follows: I. DISCOVERY LEVEL 1. This case should proceed under Discovery Level 2. II. PARTIES 2. Funda Scully is an individual residing in Tarrant County, Texas. The last three digits of her driver’s license are 608 and the last three digits of her social security number are 141. 3. Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company doing business in multiple locations in Texas (including business addresses in Fort Worth and Southlake) with its principal office at 245 Summer Street, Boston Massachusetts 02210. It can be served with PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL PETITION PAGE 1 process through its registered agent CT Corporation System, 1999 Bryan Street, Suite 900, Dallas, Texas 75201-3136. ISSUANCE OF CITIATION IS REQUESTED AT THIS TIME. 4. Brooke Scully is Plaintiff’s daughter and as is a necessary party to this suit under TRCP 39 and CPRC §37.006. She can be served at 6119 Bellaire Drive, Benbrook, Texas 76132. Plaintiff seeks the appointment of an attorney ad litem to represent the interests of her minor child. ISSUANCE OF CITIATION IS REQUESTED AT THIS TIME. 5. Brian Scully is Plaintiff’s son and as is a necessary party to this suit under TRCP 39 and CPRC §37.006. He can be served at 6119 Bellaire Drive, Benbrook, Texas 76132. Plaintiff seeks the appointment of an attorney ad litem to represent her minor child. ISSUANCE OF CITIATION IS REQUESTED AT THIS TIME. III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 6. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter because the amount in controversy is in excess of the minimum jurisdictional limit of this Court and under Texas Estates Code §§31.002(a)(3) and 32.005. Plaintiff seeks monetary relief over $1,000,000 and all other relief to which she is justly entitled. 7. This Court has personal jurisdiction over FMR because is doing business in the State of Texas, with a corporate office at 1 Destiny Way, Westlake, Texas 76262 and business branch locations in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas, and Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas. 8. Venue is proper in Tarrant County, Texas. More specifically, venue is proper against Defendants in Tarrant County because it is the county where all or a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to claim occurred. Further, it is the county of Brian Scully’s and Brooke Scully’s residence and they are necessary parties to this matter. Additionally, this lawsuit arises out of the performable obligations of FMR in Tarrant County pursuant to CPRC §15.035. PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL PETITION PAGE 2 IV. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 9. On February 14, 2003, Plaintiff and her deceased husband, Joseph Scully were married. At the time of marriage, Joseph Scully had accounts with Fidelity. During the marriage to Plaintiff created and funded additional Fidelity accounts. These accounts appear to be retirement accounts and a health savings account. The Fidelity retirement accounts, both created before marriage and after, grew in value over the course of the next 16 years. The health savings account was funded with a check written by Joseph Scully from a community property account on March 11, 2019. Until March 5, 2019, Plaintiff was the sole beneficiary of all Fidelity accounts. On March 5, 2019, Joseph Scully changed the beneficiary designations on seven of the Fidelity accounts. He removed Plaintiff as the beneficiary and designated Brian Scully and Brooke Scully as beneficiaries of the accounts, each given one-half. On March 12, 2019, a divorce petition was filed by Plaintiff, and Decedent filed a counter-petition on March 15, 2019. On July 7, 2019, Joseph Scully died. Plaintiff and Joseph Scully were not divorced at the time of his death. 10. Plaintiff is the Executor of the Estate of Joseph Scully, and she is the sole beneficiary of the estate. 11. The value in the Fidelity accounts that existed before marriage increased during the marriage of the Plaintiff and Joseph Scully. The Fidelity accounts that came into existence during the marriage were funded entirely by the assets of the community. 12. Joseph Scully fraudulently transferred Plaintiff’s community property interests in the Fidelity accounts to third party beneficiaries one week before he filed for divorce. Since the beneficiary designation change from Plaintiff to third parties of the Fidelity accounts was done fraudulently, Plaintiff’s recourse for her community property interests is against the parties to whom the funds were conveyed. PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL PETITION PAGE 3 13. Plaintiff seeks damages arising from the fraud on her community property rights, as well as reimbursement for sums expended by the community that were deposited into accounts created before marriage that increased in value, attorneys' fees, costs of court, plus pre-judgment interest and post-judgment interest. V. CAUSE OF ACTION COUNT I – UNIFORM DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ACT 14. By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiff has community property claims to the Fidelity accounts created after February 14, 2003. Joseph Scully changed the designations of the community-property-accounts beneficiary during the marriage and one week before we filed for divorce. 15. Plaintiff requests, under CPRC §§37.003 and 37.005, that the Court declare that her rights related to the Fidelity accounts, and as to the community property interest in the accounts that were not affected when the beneficiary designation change was made, and that the beneficiary change was only effective as to Joseph Scully’s community property interest. Plaintiff requests that the Court declare the rights of Brian Scully and Brooke Scully with regard to the Fidelity accounts and her rights to reimbursement for community property given rise to damages in an amount in excess of the minimum jurisdictional limits of this Court, plus pre-judgment interest and post-judgment interest allowed by law, and reasonable and necessary attorneys' fees. COUNT II - ATTORNEYS' FEES 16. §37.009 provides for recovery of attorneys’ fees. Plaintiff seeks recovery of the reasonable and necessary attorneys’ fees and has hired counsel to enforce her rights and the Estate’s and to protect the legal interests and has agreed to pay for the legal services provided. Plaintiff has incurred attorneys’ fees and will continue to incur same. PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL PETITION PAGE 4 VI. CONDITIONS PRECEDENT 17. All conditions precedent to the maintenance of this suit and Plaintiff’s recovery thereon, including attorneys' fees, have occurred or been performed. VII. PRAYER WHEREFORE, Funda Scully requests that FMR, LLC to cited to appear and answer and after appointment of the attorney ad litem, Brian Scully and Brooke Scully, as necessary parties to this suit, be cited to appear and answer herein and that upon final hearing or trial of this cause, Funda Scully be granted judgment for the following: (a) A declaration regarding the characterization of the Fidelity accounts, a declaration of her community property interests and an award of same, and a declaration of the interests of Brian Scully and Brooke Scully in the Fidelity accounts, as well as the reimbursement claims of Plaintiff related to the accounts; (b) pre-judgment interest on said amounts as allowed by law; (c) reasonable and necessary attorneys' fees incurred in connection with this suit and all subsequent appeals; (d) costs of court; (e) post-judgment interest as allowed by law; and (f) such other and further relief to which Plaintiff may be justly entitled. REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO FMR, LLC DOCUMENT REQUEST INSTRUCTIONS 1. You are requested to produce the documents responsive to this request as they are kept in the usual course of business, or to organize and label them to correspond with the categories specified below. The requests are made pursuant to TRCP 196. Responses and production of documents are due per 196.2(a) in the offices of Plaintiff’s counsel. 2. All documents shall be produced that respond to any part or clause of any paragraph of this request. If any document request cannot be produced in full, produce such document to the extent possible and indicate specifically in your response to this request your inability to produce PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL PETITION PAGE 5 the remainder and sufficient information concerning the non-produced document or portion thereof so that the court and counsel can determine if a motion to compel is appropriate and can determine if in camera inspection is needed to test the validity of any claim, privilege, or other reason for non-production. 3. File folders with tabs or labels identifying documents called for shall be produced intact with such documents. 4. Selection of documents from the files and other sources shall be performed in such a manner as to insure that the source of each document may be determined. 5. Documents attached to each other should not be separated unless sufficient records are kept to permit reconstruction of such grouping. 6. If any document requested in Plaintiff's First Request for Production of Documents to you is objected to or withheld, in whole or in part, pursuant to a claim of privilege, provide the following information with respect to each such document: a. date; b. author(s) and their title or position; c. addressee(s) and their title or position; d. person(s) receiving a copy and their title or position; e. general description of subject matter (e.g., opinion of counsel on merits of claim); f. the nature of the privilege (e.g., attorney/client, work product, etc.); g. the factual and legal basis for the claim of such privilege (e.g., communication between attorney for corporation and outside counsel relating to acquisition of legal advice); h. the identity of each person who was present when the document was prepared and who has seen the document; and i. the identity of every other document which refers to or describes the contents of such document. 7. You are required to file a written response stating with respect to each request that the responsive documents are provided unless the request is objected to, in which event the reason for the objection shall be stated. I. DOCUMENTS TO BE PRODUCED PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL PETITION PAGE 6 1. All documents for the Fidelity accounts created by or registered to Joseph Scully on any platform operated by Fidelity including but not limited to the accounts with the last four digits of 1530, 6904, 6392, 9335, 4263, 8874, 6096, 6099, and 2066. 2. All beneficiary designation documents, including electronic form, for the Fidelity accounts with the last four digits of 1530, 6904, 6392, 9335, 4263, 8874, 6096, 6099, and 2066. 3. All change of beneficiary designation documents including electronic form, for the Fidelity accounts with the last four digits of 1530, 6904, 6392, 9335, 4263, 8874, 6096, 6099, and 2066. 4. All account statements from February 2003 through present for all Fidelity accounts created by or registered to Joseph Scully on any platform operated by Fidelity including but not limited to the accounts with the last four digits of 1530, 6904, 6392, 9335, 4263, 8874, 6096, 6099, and 2066. Respectfully submitted, DECKER POOLE, PLLC /s/ Olyn Poole By: ____________________________________ Olyn Poole State Bar No. 24037292 6300 Ridglea Place, Suite 101 Fort Worth, Texas 76116 Telephone: (817) 348-9060 Facsimile: (817) 348-9070 olyn@deckerpoole.com ATTORNEYS FOR FUNDA SCULLY PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL PETITION PAGE 7