Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
The purpose of sanctions is to secure compliance with the rules, to deter future violation of the rules, and to punish parties that violate the rules. (Chrysler Corp. v. Blackmon, 841 S.W.2d 844, 849 (Tex. 1992).) The sanction must be directly related to the offensive conduct. (Paradigm Oil, Inc. v. Retamco Open, Ina, 372 S.W.3d 177, 184 (Tex. 2012).) A just sanction must be directed against the abuse and toward remedying the prejudice caused to the innocent party. (American Flood Research, Inc. v. Jones, 192 S.W.3d 581, 583 (Tex. 2006).)
“Trial courts have inherent power to impose sanctions for bad faith abuse of the judicial process even when the targeted conduct is not expressly covered by a rule or statute. (Ezeoke v. Tracy, 349 S.W.3d 679, 685 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, no pet.).) “The scope of a trial court's discretion in this context is limited by the recognition that this power exists to the extent necessary to deter, alleviate, and counteract bad faith abuse of the judicial process, such as any significant interference with the traditional core functions of Texas courts.” (Id.)
A party can move for sanctions under Rule 13 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 10.002, and Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 215.
Rule 13 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure authorizes the imposition of sanctions against an attorney, a represented party, or both, who filed a pleading that is either:
(Tex. R. Civ. P. 13; see also Rudisell v. Paquette (2002) 89 S.W.3d 233, 236.)
The rule defines “groundless” as having “no basis in law or fact and not warranted by good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law.” (Tex. R. Civ. P. 13.) Sanctions may only be imposed for good cause under Rule 13, the particulars of which must be stated in the order. (Tex. R. Civ. P. 13; Rudisell, 89 S.W.3d at 237.)
A party moving for sanctions under Section 10.001 should describe the specific conduct violating Section 10.001. (Sec. 10.002). Specifically, “the movant must show that the pleading was filed for the improper purpose of harassment.” (R.M. Dudley Const. Co., Inc. v. Dawson, 258 S.W.3d 694, 710 (Tex. App.—Waco 2008, pet. denied).) The party moving for sanctions must prove the pleading party's subjective state of mind.” (Id.)
Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. provides failure to submit to an expert's examinations may result in the following sanctions:
See (Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 841.0610).
Under Rule 13, the responding party is required notice and a hearing before the imposition of sanctions. “Imposing sanctions without the requisite notice and hearing also violates the requirements of due process.” (Aldine Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Baty, 946 S.W.2d 851, 852 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1997, no writ).)
Under Sec. 10.003, “[t]he court shall provide a party who is the subject of a motion for sanctions under Section 10.002 notice of the allegations and a reasonable opportunity to respond to the allegations.” The “trial court must hold an evidentiary hearing to make the necessary factual determinations about the party's or attorney's motives and credibility.” (R.M. Dudley Const. Co, 258 S.W.3d at 709.)
A trial court's ruling on a motion for sanctions is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard. (Cire v. Cummings (2004) 134 S.W.3d 835, 838; Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc. (1985) 701 S.W.2d 238, 241.) The test for an abuse of discretion is not whether, in the opinion of the reviewing court, the facts present an appropriate case for the trial court's action, but “whether the court acted without reference to any guiding rules and principles.” (Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc., 701 S.W.2d at 241.) The trial court's ruling should be reversed only if it was arbitrary or unreasonable. (Cire v. Cummings, 134 S.W.3d at 839.)
Rule 13 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure authorizes a trial court to impose sanctions against an attorney, a represented party, or both, who file a pleading that is either (1) groundless and brought in bad faith; or (2) groundless and brought for the purpose of harassment. (See Tex. R. Civ. P. 13; Robson v. Gilbreath, 267 S.W.3d 401, 405 (Tex. App.—Austin 2008, pet. denied).)
Chapter 10 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code allows a trial court to sanction an attorney or a party for filing motions or pleadings that lack a reasonable basis in fact or law. (Low v. Henry (2007) 221 S.W.3d 609, 615; Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 10.001-.005 (West 2002).)
Rule 13 states:
The signatures of attorneys or parties constitute a certificate by them that they have read the pleading, motion, or other paper; that to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief formed after reasonable inquiry the instrument is not groundless and brought in bad faith or groundless and brought for the purpose of harassment. Attorneys or parties who shall bring a fictitious suit as an experiment to get an opinion of the court, or who shall file any fictitious pleading in a cause for such a purpose, or shall make statements in pleading which they know to be groundless and false, for the purpose of securing a delay of the trial of the cause, shall be held guilty of a contempt. If a pleading, motion or other paper is signed in violation of this rule, the court, upon motion or upon its own initiative, after notice and hearing, shall impose an appropriate sanction available under Rule 215-2b, upon the person who signed it, a represented party, or both. Courts shall presume that pleadings, motions, and other papers are filed in good faith. No sanctions under this rule may be imposed except for good cause, the particulars of which must be stated in the sanction order. “Groundless.”for purposes of this rule means no basis in law or fact and not warranted by good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law. A general denial does not constitute a violation of this rule. The amount requested for damages does not constitute a violation of this rule.
“A court that determines that a person has signed a pleading or motion in violation of Section 10.001 may impose a sanction on the person, a party represented by the person, or both.” (Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 10.004.)
Section 10.001 states:
Sec. 10.001. SIGNING OF PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS. The signing of a pleading or motion as required by the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure constitutes a certificate by the signatory that to the signatory's best knowledge, information, and belief, formed after reasonable inquiry:
A court may generally impose sanctions when a party fails to comply with a proper discovery request. (See Tex. R. Civ. P. 215.2; Magnuson v. Mullen, 65 S.W.3d 815, 828 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2002, pet denied.).)
For example, pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 215.2, if a deponent does not attend a noticed or court-ordered deposition, the trial court can impose sanctions, including the ultimate sanction of dismissal or default. (Tex. R. Civ. P. 215.2(b); Petitt v. Laware, 715 S.W.2d 688, 691 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1986, writ ref'd n.r.e.).)
When determining whether Rule 13 sanctions are proper, the trial court must examine the facts available to the litigant and the circumstances existing when the litigant filed the pleading. (Parker v. Walton, 233 S.W.3d 535, 539 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2007, no pet.).)
When considering sanctions under Rule 215, a court should ensure that the punishment fits the crime. (TransAmerican Nat. Gas Corp. v. Powell, 811 S.W.2d 913, 917 (Tex. 1991).) When a court decides to sanction, the sanctions must have a direct relationship to the offensive conduct, measured by a direct nexus among the conduct, the offender, and the sanctions imposed. (Am. Flood Research, Inc. v. Jones, 192 S.W.3d 581, 583 (Tex. 2006); Spohn Hosp. v. Mayer, 104 S.W.3d 878, 882 (Tex. 2003); TransAmerican, 811 S.W.2d at 917.) A court must not impose sanctions more severe than necessary to promote full compliance with the rules. (Am. Flood, 192 S.W.3d at 583; Spohn Hosp., 104 S.W.3d at 882.)
Sanctions must be “just”, that is, the punishment should fit the crime. (Tex. R. Civ. P. 215.2 (b); Transamerican, 811 S.W.2d at 917.) A two part test is used to determine if sanctions are “just”. First, the sanction must be directly related to the offensive conduct. (Id.) Second, the sanction must not be excessive, it should be no more severe than necessary to promote full compliance. (Id.)
A death-penalty sanction is one that has the effect of adjudicating a dispute without regard to the merits. (Id. at 918.) Sanctions such as dismissal should be reserved for a party’s flagrant bad faith or repeated discovery abuses. (Id. at 919.)
Texas Courts use a four-part test to determine whether death-penalty sanctions are appropriate: (1) the sanction must be directly related to the offensive conduct; (2) the sanction must not be excessive and should be no more severe than necessary to promote full compliance; (3) the court should impose a lesser sanction first, unless egregious misconduct is present; and (4) the party’s conduct must justify the presumption that her claims lack merit. (Id. at 917-18; Cire v. Cummings, 134 S.W.3d 835, 842 (Tex. 2004).) In a case of egregious misconduct, the court is not required to use a lesser sanction before imposing death penalty sanctions as long as the record reflects the court considered lesser sanctions and the party’s conduct justifies the presumption that its claims lack merit. (Cire, 134 S.W.3d at 842.)
Rule 215.2 provides a non-inclusive list of sanctions when a party fails to comply with proper discovery requests. These include an order charging all or any portion of the expenses of discovery against the disobedient party or the attorney advising him, and an order striking out pleadings or parts thereof or dismissing with or without prejudice the action or proceedings or any part thereof, or rendering a judgment by default against the disobedient party. In lieu of any such orders, or in addition thereto, the court shall require the party failing to obey the order or the attorney advising him, or both, to pay the reasonable expenses, including attorney fees, caused by the failure, unless the court finds that the failure was substantially justified or that other circumstances make an award of expenses unjust. Such an order shall be subject to review on appeal from the final judgment. (Tex. R. Civ. P. 215.2 (b)(8).)
With respect to 10.002 motions, “a court shall describe in an order imposing a sanction under this chapter the conduct the court has determined violated Section 10.001 and explain the basis for the sanction imposed.” (Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §10.005.)
In some circumstances, a trial court may take judicial notice of the case file for purposes of ruling on a sanctions motion. (R.M. Dudley Const. Co., 258 S.W.3d at 710.)
Under Section 10.002, “the court may award to a party prevailing on a motion under this section the reasonable expenses and attorney's fees incurred in presenting or opposing the motion, and if no due diligence is shown the court may award to the prevailing party all costs for inconvenience, harassment, and out-of-pocket expenses incurred or caused by the subject litigation. ” “The court may not award monetary sanctions against a represented party for a violation of Section 10.001(2).” (Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §10.004(d).) “The court may not award monetary sanctions on its own initiative unless the court issues its order to show cause before a voluntary dismissal or settlement of the claims made by or against the party or the party's attorney who is to be sanctioned.” (Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §10.004(e).)
Under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 215.1(d), the moving party is entitled to reasonable expenses incurred in obtaining the order, including attorney fees. Specifically, Rule 215.1(d) provides that if a motion for sanctions is granted, the Court shall, “after opportunity for hearing, require a party or deponent whose conduct necessitated the motion or the party or attorney advising such conduct or both of them to pay, at such time as ordered by the court, the moving party the reasonable expenses incurred in obtaining the order, including attorney fees, unless the court finds that the opposition to the motion was substantially justified or that other circumstances make an award of expenses unjust.” (Tex. R. Civ. P. 215.1(d).)
CAUSE NO. 23-07-10911 JEREMY LAWRENCE AND ASHLEY IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF LAWRENCE VS. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS GRACEPOINT HOLDING COMPANY LLC d/b/a GRACEPOINT HOMES 457" JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANT COREY CONSTRUCTION HOUSTON, LLC’S ORIGINAL ANSWER AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS TO THE HONO…
CAUSE NO. 23-08-12636 RYAN WRIGHT AND ASHLEY WRIGHT § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF VS. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS GRACEPOINT HOMES, LLC, AND COX COMMUNITIES, LLC 457™ JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANT COREY CONSTRUCTION HOUSTON, LLC’S ORIGINAL ANSWER AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS TO THE HO…
Electronically Filed 2/22/2024 3:39 PM Hidalgo County District Clerks Reviewed By: Stephanie Sierra CAUSE NO. C-4327-23-L ALEX…
Hidalgo County, TX
Feb 22, 2024
Electronically Filed 9/5/2023 1:22 PM Hidalgo County District Clerks Reviewed By: Victor Castro CAUSE NO. C-3374-23-M CITY OF MISSION …
2020-49935a / Court: 334 No. 2020-49935 DANIEL FIELDS § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF § PLAINTIFF § § § § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS § MRUGE…
CAUSE NO. IMPERIAL LOFTS, LLC IN THE COUNTY CIVIL COURT laintiff AT LAW NO. ONE (1) SETH RICHARD GUTIERREZ, CHRISTOPHER TURNER AND ALL OCCUPANTS Defendants FORT BEND COUNTY, TEXAS AMENDED RESPONSE TO …
NO. MUHAMMAD SHAHZAD IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, 400TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT AUDREY TAYLOR RAINWATER Defendant. OF FORT BEND COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: NOW COMES Plaintiff, MUHAM…
Electronically Filed 5/1/2023 3:05 PM Hidalgo County District Clerks Reviewed By: Nancy Delgado C…
Hidalgo County, TX
May 01, 2023
NOW COME Corey Kelly, Movant herein, prior to the voir dire examination of the jury panel and out of the presence and hearing of the panel, and makes this Motion in Limine. to exclude matters that are irrelevant, inadmissible, or prejudicial to the material issues in this cause. If said mat introduced into the trial of this cause through a party, a witness, or an attorney, such introduction will cause irreparable harm to Movant c…
Fort Bend County, TX
Apr 10, 2023
Perez-Jaramillo, Maggie
FILED 2/14/2023 12:28 PM FELICIA PITRE …
Mar 23, 2022
OPEN
FILED 2/14/2023 12:28 PM FELICIA PITRE …
Mar 23, 2022
OPEN
NO. -274427 KENNETH PALEY IN THE DISTRICT COURT PETITIONER JUDICIAL DISTRICT KEITH PALEY FORT BEND COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS PLAINTIFFKenneth Paley asks the Court to deny DEFENDANT’s motion for sanctions. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, nneth P ey sued d…
Fort Bend County, TX
Feb 09, 2023
NO. 20 LORETTA SHELTON IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, 268th JUDICIAL DISTRICT SHANPU JI Defendant. FORT BEND COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: NOW COMES Plaintiff, LORETTA SHELTON, Mova…
Oct 08, 2020
Pending
Fort Bend County, TX
Dec 13, 2022
FILED 11/22/2022 9:38 AM FELICIA PITRE DIS…
Jun 28, 2022
CLOSED
Dallas County, TX
Nov 22, 2022
MOYE', ERIC
GR to exclude matters that are irrelevant, inadmissible, or prejudicial to the material issues in this cause. If said mat introduced into the trial of this cause through a party, a witness, or an attorney, such introduction will cause irreparable harm to Movant the Court to instruct all counsel and the parties herein that violation of any of these instructions may cause harm to Movant and deprive Movant of a fair and impartial …
CAUSE NO. 22-DCV-293829 BREONA GONZALEZ, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF A.G., A MINOR, FORT BEND COUNTY, TEXAS PAMELA BORING, Individually; FOSTER CREEK VETERINARY HOSPITAL, PLLC; AND DULLES PROPERTY, LLC, 400TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANT PAMELA BORING’S …
Fort Bend County, TX
Nov 14, 2022
FILED 10/27/2022 4:49 PM FELICIA PITRE DISTRICT CLERK …
Electronically Filed 10/21/2022 9:02 AM Hidalgo County District Clerks Reviewed By: Yazmine Galvan CAUSE NO. C-2…
Filed: 10/12/2022 9:41 AM JOHN D. KINARD - District Clerk Galveston County, Texas Envelope No. 69132773 …
CAUSE NO. 2022-60938 AMJAD SHEIKH IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, Vs. 80th JUDICIAL DISTRICT HOUSTON AUTO M. IMPORTS NORTH, LTD. d/b/a MERCEDES-BENZ OF HOUSTON NORTH Defendant. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS DEFENDANT’S ORIGINAL ANSWER SUBJECT TO ARBITRATION AND COU…
Filed: 10/10/2022 3:13 PM JOHN D. KINARD - District Clerk Galveston County, Texas Envelope No. 69067676 …
Electronically Filed 10/7/2022 10:28 AM Hidalgo County District Clerks Reviewed By: Nancy Delgado CAUSE NO…
Electronically Filed 10/7/2022 10:28 AM Hidalgo County District Clerks …
CAUSE NO. 18 255088 Effie Xu IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, HAYS COUNTY, TEXAS Kim Tuyen Duong Defendant. JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: …
Sep 17, 2018
Disposed
NO. FNU MUZAMEL IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, 457TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT JEREMY HORTON Defendant. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: NOW COMES Plaintiff, Fnu Muzamel, Movant herei…
Aug 17, 2021
Disposed
FILED 8/15/2022 9:13 AM FELICIA PITRE …
FILED 8/15/2022 9:13 AM FELICIA PITRE …
NO. 20 GANIAT ABIODUN JAYEOLA AND IN THE DISTRICT COURT AISHAT OLAJUMOKE ANIMASHAUN Plaintiffs, 400TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT JAMES JOSEPH LESYNA Defendant. FORT BEND COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFFS MOTION IN LIMIN TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: NOW …
Filed 5/10/2022 5:43 PM Beverley McGrew Walker District Clerk …
Feb 19, 2019
Disposed
FILED 4/28/2022 4:13 PM FELICIA PITRE DISTRICT CLERK …
Filed 41/27/2022 1:19 PM Beverley McGrew Walker District Clerk Fort Bend County, Te…
CAUSE NO. 21 AMANDA CHANTAL WATLER, IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, 457TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT GARRETT CHARLES FLORES AND THERESA MAGDELENA HANKINS, Defendants. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: …
CAUSE NO. 20 09819 CHRIS ALBERS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY J UDICIAL DISTRICT ------------ +--+ +--+ = == ENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL Defendant, State Farm Mutual…
Filed: 1/24/2022 7:36 AM JOHN D. KINARD - District Clerk Galveston County, Texas Envelope No. 61062697 …
Received and E-Filed for Record 11/22/2021 11:02 AM Melisa Miller, District Clerk …
FILED - 11/1/2021 8:48 PM 2021-DCL-01265 / 58743420 LAURA PEREZ-REYES …
Cause No. HOUSTON OCCUPATIONAL IN THE DISTRICT COURT THERAPY, PLLC PLAINTIFF JUDICIAL DISTRICT THERASOURCE, LLC, TYSON LIN And CHRISTINE L. LIN DEFENDANTS HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS DEFENDANTS’ FIRST AMENDED ANSWER AND MOTION FOR S…
FILED 10/1/2021 4:47 PM FELICIA PITRE …
FILED - 8/11/2021 8:27 AM 2018-DCL-06493 / 56213842 LAURA PEREZ-REYES …
NO. AYDEAN SHAYESTEH ABBOUD IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, 295th JUDICIAL DISTRICT FARMERS TEXAS COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY Defendant. OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: NOW COME Plaint…
NO. ARPAN GUPTA IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, 334TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT MONICA PATEL Defendant. OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: NOW COME Plaintiff Arpan Gupta, Movant herein, prior to the voir dire examination of the jury panel and out …
Aug 14, 2017
Disposed (Final)
Electronically Filed 7/30/2021 12:26 PM Hidalgo County District Clerks …
Nov 12, 2019
Filed
FILED 7/26/2021 4:56 PM FELICIA PITRE DISTRICT CLERK …
FILED 7/13/2021 9:36 PM FELICIA PITRE DISTRICT CLERK …
NO. DELENA LE IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff HARIS COUNTY, TEXAS ALLSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY AND JOHN/JANE DOE Defendan 165TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: NOW …
Harris County, TX
Jun 17, 2021
Motor Vehicle Accident
NO. RACHEL GARG AND CHETAN IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff 281ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT ZACHARY RODRIGUEZ AND ANGELA RODRIGUEZ Defendants COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: NOW COME Rachel Garg and Ch…
May 29, 2019
Ready Docket
Harris County, TX
Jun 16, 2021
Motor Vehicle Accident
NO. 2019 TREMAYNE THREADGILL IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, 295TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT GLORIA BENITEZ AND ANTONIO GAONA MERLAN Defendants. OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: NOW COME Plaintiff …
Jun 19, 2019
Ready Docket
Harris County, TX
Jun 09, 2021
Motor Vehicle Accident
CAUSE NO. 30696 TRACIE WALTON IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS CCMP CAPITAL ADVISORS, LP, Defendant/Counter Plaintiff …
Filed: 5/14/2021 4:23 PM JOHN D. KINARD - District Clerk Galveston County, Texas Envelope No. 53472143 …
Feb 06, 2019
Disposed
CAUSE NO. 02324 UNITED RENTALS, INC. AND IN THE DISTRICT COURT UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA), INC., § § Plaintiffs, § § MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS § …
FILED 4/26/2021 9:23 AM FELICIA PITRE …
CAUSE NO. 2017-59530 MAVIS CARTER IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff VS. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY OF HARRIS COUNTY Defendant …
Harris County, TX
Apr 19, 2021
Motor Vehicle Accident
NO. 2019-36333 AMAL AHMED HUSSEIN § IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, § § § …
Harris County, TX
Apr 19, 2021
Motor Vehicle Accident
CAUSE NO. 2019-62004 SADAF KARA § IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, § § V. § …
Aug 30, 2019
Ready Docket
Harris County, TX
Mar 31, 2021
Motor Vehicle Accident
CAUSE NO. 2019 JERALD WILLIAMS AND GARRICK IN THE DISTRICT COURT BROWN Plaintiffs 9TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT JOHN KOVARCIK OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS Defendant PLAINTIFFS MOTION IN LIMINE TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: NOW COME Plaintiff Jerald Williams a…
May 24, 2019
Ready Docket
Harris County, TX
Mar 16, 2021
Motor Vehicle Accident
NO. WOODLAKE ESTATES IN THE DISTRICT COURT CH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. Plaintiff, TIMOTHY P. HOLT Defendant FORT BENDCOUNTY, TEXAS S ANSWER General Denial the allegations in Plaintiff Original Affirmati…
Fort Bend County, TX
Mar 09, 2021
FILED 3/4/2021 4:18 PM FELICIA PITRE DISTRICT CLERK …
Jan 12, 2021
CLOSED
LAKESHA FIELDS IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, S2C PARTNERS, LLC AND SWAZON, INC., d/b/a THE GRAHAM APARTMENTS HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS Defendants. DEFENDANT’S ORIGINAL ANSWER …
Dec 15, 2020
Active - Civil
NO. 2019-51448 DENTON WAYNE HENRY § IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, § § § …
Jul 26, 2019
Ready Docket
Harris County, TX
Jan 29, 2021
Motor Vehicle Accident
CAUSE NO. 2017 SHAHRZAD AHMADI IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, 333RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT ISHMAEL DLIZE SMITH Defendant. OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: NOW …
Harris County, TX
Jan 20, 2021
Motor Vehicle Accident
CAUSE NO. 2019 MOHAMED CHIHANI AND IRMA IN THE DISTRICT COURT CHIHANI INDIVIDUALLY A/N/F OF A.C., Plaintiffs, 1st JUDICIAL DISTRICT SAMARIA JIMENEZ AKA SAMARIA ALHOSSARI AND ALAA ALHOSSARI Defendants. OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION …
Harris County, TX
Jan 14, 2021
Motor Vehicle Accident
NO. 2019-21135 HENRY BENAVIDES AND JARITZA § IN THE DISTRICT COURT SANCHEZ § Plaintiffs, § § 151ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT …
Mar 22, 2019
Ready Docket
Harris County, TX
Jan 11, 2021
Motor Vehicle Accident
CAUSE NO. 2019-25280 SANTOS GONZALES VASQUEZ AND § IN THE DISTRICT COURT GERARDO VASQUEZ § § VS. § OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS …
Harris County, TX
Dec 22, 2020
Motor Vehicle Accident
CASE NUMBER: 2020-04935 DEAN MCNEELY AND THE WEST FORK GROUP, LLC. IN THE DISTRICT COURT PLAINTIFFS § V. …
Harris County, TX
Dec 15, 2020
PERSONAL INJ (NON-AUTO)
CASE NUMBER: 2020-04935 DEAN MCNEELY AND THE WEST FORK GROUP, LLC. IN THE DISTRICT COURT PLAINTIFFS § V. …
Harris County, TX
Dec 15, 2020
PERSONAL INJ (NON-AUTO)
IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, vs. 189th JUDICIAL DISTRICT Chontica Ann Jenkins Defendant. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: COMES NOW, Chontica Ann Jenkins, the Defendant in the above referenced and numbered cause, and files this Motion To Compel Medical Authorization, and wou…
Harris County, TX
Nov 24, 2020
Motor Vehicle Accident
FILED 11/19/2020 11:32 AM FELICIA PITRE DISTRICT CLERK …
FILED 11/19/2020 11:32 AM FELICIA PITRE DISTRICT CLERK …
FILED 11/19/2020 11:32 AM FELICIA PITRE DISTRICT CLERK …
NO. 2020-46558 JOSE SERRANO § INTHE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff VS. RAMIRO VALDEZ JR., ARJADE CONSTRUCTION LLC, J HANNAH BUILD-DESIGN GROUP, LLC, J HANNAH DESIGN GROUP AND REYMUNDO OLVERA D/B/A R &L CONSTRUCTION Defendants § 3338? JUDICIAL DISTRICT HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS OD (On Cr Cn 602 Cin (OD 6On 407 COD DEFENDANT, J HANNAH BUILD-DESIGN GROUP, LLC AND J HANNAH DESIGN GROUP’S AMENDED ORIGINAL ANSWER, COUNTERCLAIM & REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE Defendants, J HANNAH BUILD-DESIGN GROUP, LLC and J H…
Oct 15, 2002
Ready Docket
CAUSE NO. 20 OSCAR VARGAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS JACOB DOMINGUEZ JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: NOW COME Plaintif…
Dec 15, 2017
Ready Docket
Harris County, TX
Sep 16, 2020
Motor Vehicle Accident
NO. 2020-46558 JOSE SERRANO § IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff VS. 8 § § § RAMIRO VALDEZ JR., § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS ARJADE CONSTRUCTION LLC, § J HANNAH BUILD-DESIGN GROUP, LLC, § J HANNAH DESIGN GROUP AND § REYMUNDO OLVERA D/B/A § R & LCONSTRUCTION § 5 Defendants 3338? JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANT, J HANNAH BUILD-DESIGN GROUP, LLC AND J HANNAH DESIGN GROUP’S ORIGINAL ANSWER, COUNTERCLAIM & REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE Defendants, J HANNAH BUILD-DESIGN GROUP, LLC and J HANNAH DESIGN GROUP (colle…
Oct 15, 2002
Ready Docket
FILED 8/10/2020 12:56 PM FELICIA PITRE …
CAUSE NO. SUSAN CARTER IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, JUDICIAL DISTRICT ALLSTATE FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS Defendant. PLAINTIFF’S MOTIO: LIMIN TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: …
Harris County, TX
Aug 19, 2020
Motor Vehicle Accident
FILED 8/14/2020 12:15 PM FELICIA PITRE …
CAUSE NO. 2020-08604 DONNA LASKER, Individually and as IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Representative of the Estate of Lois Lee, Deceased; and RAY LEE, as Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Lois Lee, Deceased HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS R…
Harris County, TX
Aug 13, 2020
MALPRACTICE (MEDICAL)
Tamika Craft-Demming
FILED 8/10/2020 12:56 PM FELICIA PITRE …
FILED 7/31/2020 12:57PM FELICIA PITRE …
Electronically Filed 7/7/2020 3:33 PM Hidalgo County District Clerks …
Electronically Filed 7/6/2020 2:17 PM Hidalgo County District Clerks Reviewed By: Iris Rami…
NO. 2019-36497 NAVID GHAHREMANI § IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, § § § V. …
May 28, 2019
Ready Docket
Harris County, TX
Jul 02, 2020
Motor Vehicle Accident
FILED: 6/22/2020 3:05 PM David Trantham Denton County District Clerk By: Joan Vallee, Deputy CAUSE NO 19-8242-367 HELEN BECHTEL, JAMES FLETCHER IN THE DISTRICT COURT …
Denton County, TX
Jun 22, 2020
Other Civil
FILED: 6/22/2020 3:10 PM David Trantham Denton County District Clerk By: Joan Vallee, Deputy CAUSE NO 19-8242-367 HELEN BECHTEL, JAMES FLETCHER …
Denton County, TX
Jun 22, 2020
Other Civil
CAUSE NO. 2019 50062 BJBDH HOLDINGS, LLC, and IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE BRISCOE GROUP, PLLC, § Plaintiffs, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS ROBERT RODRI…
FILED: 6/17/2020 4:42 PM David Trantham Denton County District Clerk By: Joan Vallee, Deputy NO. 18-5868-211 IN THE MATTER OF IN THE DISTRICT COURT THE MARRIAGE OF NANCY BOUA…
Denton County, TX
Jun 17, 2020
Divorce with Children
CAUSE NO. 2016-38894 FARRAR & BALL, LLP Plaintiff IN DISTRICT COURT OF vs. NICOLE HUDSON HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS Defendant/ Third Party Plaintiff WESLEY T. BALL, KYLE W. FARRAR, …
Jun 07, 2016
Ready Docket
Harris County, TX
Jun 15, 2020
TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE
CAUSE NO. 2016-38894 FARRAR & BALL, LLP Plaintiff IN DISTRICT COURT OF vs. NICOLE HUDSON HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS Defendant/ Third Party Plaintiff WESLEY T. BALL, KYLE W. FARRAR, …
Jun 07, 2016
Ready Docket
Harris County, TX
Jun 15, 2020
TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE
Electronically Submitted 6/11/2020 4:49 PM Hidalgo County Clerk …
Hidalgo County, TX
Jun 11, 2020
Electronically Submitted 6/11/2020 4:49 PM Hidalgo County Clerk …
Hidalgo County, TX
Jun 11, 2020
FILED 3/13/2020 3:49PM FELICIA PITRE …
Tarrant County, TX
Jun 08, 2020
CAUSE E E NO. 2019-05140 Ea ROSALINDA CASTILLO IN THE DISTRICT COURT PLAINTIFF Vv 113™ JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MARIO OSCAR DELEON HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS DEFENDANT PL…
Harris County, TX
Jun 01, 2020
Motor Vehicle Accident
Electronically Filed 5/26/2020 9:28 AM Hidalgo County District Clerks …
CAUSE NO. 2018-90741 SHAHRIAR NASERZADEH, NOUSIN IN THE DISTRICT COUR NASERZADEH, AND NIMA NASERZADEH, Plaintiffs, V. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS PRINCIPAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, …
CAUSE NO. 2020-19743 BIRCH BUILDERS, LLC IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF VS. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS MICHAEL H. PRUITT JUDICIAL DISTRICT M…
Mar 27, 2020
Ready Docket
NOTICE: THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS SENSITIVE DATA IN THE MATTER OF § IN THE DISTRICT COURT THE MARRIAGE OF § § VERENICE ARCE § 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT …
Travis County, TX
Apr 20, 2020
DIVORCE W/O CHILD (FAMILY LAW)
CAUSE NO. GREGORY D. NEAL IN THE DISTRICT COURT 55TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ROBERT P. CORTEZ HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO…
Jun 21, 2019
Disposed (Final)
Harris County, TX
Apr 13, 2020
Motor Vehicle Accident
NO. 2018 VICTOR ROSALES IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT WOODLANDS MALL ASSOCIATES, LLC AND MILLARD MALL SERVICES, INC. Defendants OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: …
Harris County, TX
Apr 02, 2020
PERSONAL INJ (NON-AUTO)
FILED 3/27/2020 10:41AM FELICIA PITRE …
Oct 24, 2019
CLOSED
342-308531-19 FILED TARRANT COUNTY 3/25/2020 9:29 AM …
Tarrant County, TX
Mar 25, 2020
342-308531-19 FILED TARRANT COUNTY 3/24/2020 7:52 PM THOMAS A. WILDER DISTRICT C…
Tarrant County, TX
Mar 24, 2020
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.